TINJAUAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN ANAK DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 56/PID.SUS/2023/PN WNG

Rhevika Gurindra Hapsari, Bambang Santoso

Abstract

This article analyzes criminal procedural law related to the suitability of the judge's considerations in deciding the case of the crime of child molestation in Verdict Number 56/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Wng with Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The purpose of this article is to prove whether the judge's considerations in deciding the case of child molestation in Verdict Number 56/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Wng are in accordance with Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The research method used is normative legal research. This research is prescriptive and applied. The method for collecting legal materials is by means of literature study and the legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of research and discussions to answer this problem, it can be concluded that the judge's consideration in deciding the case of child molestation in Verdict Number 56/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Wng is in accordance with Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This is because the judge's consideration in deciding the case contained 3 pieces of evidence, namely Witness Statement, Defendant's Statement and Letter (visum et repertum number: 445.1/06757).

 

Keywords

Judge's considerations; Crime of Child Abuse; Criminal Procedure Code

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arif Gosita. 1985. Masalah Perlindungan Anak. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo. A. Salman Manggalatung. 2014. “Hubungan Antara Fakta, Norma, Moral dan Doktrin Hukum Dalam Petimbangan Putusan Hakim”. Jurnal Cita Hukum. Volume 2 Nomor. 2. Bambang Santoso, Soehartono, Muhammad Rustamaji. 2017. “Unearthing The Philosophical Roots Of Pancasila On Distinctive Legal Treatments For Children In Conflict With The Law”. Yustisia. Volume 6 Nomor 2. Daniel Rees dan Joseph Sabia. 2013. “Forced Intercourse Mental Health and Human Capital”. Southern Economic Journal. Volume 80 Issue 2. Dipta Yoga Pramudita. 2017. “Pembuktian Keterangan Saksi Anak Tanpa Sumpah Menurut KUHAP”. Jurnal Verstek. Volume 5 Nomor 3. Faisal dan Muhammad Rustamaji. 2020. Hukum Pidana Umum. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media. Hottua Pakpahan, Herlina Manullang, Ojak Nainggolan. “Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perusakan Hutan”. Patik: Jurnal Hukum. Volume 8 Nomor 1. I Made Widnyana. 2010. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska. Immaculata Anindya Karisa. 2020. “Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Oleh Anak”. Jurnal Verstek. Volume 8 Nomor 1. Lilik Mulyadi. 2007. Hukum Acara Pidana: Normatif, Teoritis, Praktik dan Permasalahannya. Bandung: Alumni. M.Yahya Harahap. 2005. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Moeljatno. 2003. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2021. Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Prenada Media Group. Ratna Jayanti Suyono. 2022. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Saksi Anak Tanpa Sumpah Serta Pertimbangan Hakim Terkait Pemenuhan Asas Minimum Pembuktian”. Jurnal Verstek. Volume 5 Nomor 1. Rusli Muhammad. 2007. Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta: Citra Aditya. Teguh Prasetyo. 2015. Hukum Pidana (Cetakan ke-VI). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Veni Aryanti. 2022. “Tinjauan Yuridis Keabsahan Keterangan Saksi Anak Korban Tanpa Sumpah dalam Persidangan (Studi Putusan Perkara Nomor 427/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Kpn)”. Eksaminasi: Jurnal Hukum. Volume 2 Nomor 2.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v12i2.82605

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.