TELAAH VISUM ET REPERTUM SEBAGAI FAKTOR PENENTU DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 208/PID.B/2022/PN BDG

Dimas Bagus Anggoro Bangun, Itok Dwi Kurniawan

Abstract

This study aims to determine how the Magistrate Judges' legal considerations are based on Visum et Repertum and how Visum et Repertum is a determining factor in proving theft charges with violence resulting in death in death Decision Number 208/Pid.B/2022/PN.Bdg. This is normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied to case studies. The technique of collecting primary and secondary legal materials used for this research is a documental study and literature materials. Regarding the results of the research and discussion, it can be seen that the considerations of the Magistrate Judges in Decision Number 208/Pid.B/2022/PN.Bdg have included juridical and non-juridical aspects. Magistrate Judges require the opinion of a doctor as outlined in the Visum et Repertum, bearing in mind that the judge as a case breaker is not equipped with knowledge related to forensic medicine, so he must pay attention to Visum et Repertum as one piece of evidence that is adapted to other evidence. In addition, Visum et Repertum is a determining factor in proving the indictment of Decision 208/Pid.B/2022/PN.Bdg because it has strength in evidence, namely through matching Visum et Repertum with witness statements, which results are used as conclusions for judges who can be used as a consideration in determining whether a crime has occurred or not and determining the guilt of the defendant at trial.

Keywords

Judge’s Legal Consideration, Visum et Repertum, Evidence

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdul Mun’im Idriest dan Agung Legowon Tjiptomartono. Penerapan Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik dalam Proses Penyidikan Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Sagung Seto, 2015

Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012. Effendi Erdiyanto, Hukum Pidana Indonesia,Bandung: Refika aditama, 2011.

E.Y. Kanter & S.R Sianturi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Storia Grafika. 2012

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014.

R. Soeparmono. Keterangan Ahli & Visum Et Repertum dalam Aspek Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Madar Maju. 2016.

Subekti, Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramitha, 2001.

Sudikno Mertokusumo. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2006.

Aufa Usrina & Nurhafifah. "Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Kekerasan yang Mengakibatkan Hilangnya Nyawa Seseorang (Suatu Penelitian di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Bireuen)". JIM Bidang Hukum Pidana. Volume 5 No. 1. (2021).

Bastianto Nugroho. “Peranan Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Pidana dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut KUHAP”. Jurnal Yuridika. Volume 32 No. 1. (2017).

Nurhafifah dan Rahmiati. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terkait Hal yang Memberatkan dan Meringankan Putusan”. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. No.66. Th. XVII. (2015). Deysky Neidi Gagundali. “Visum et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana”. Lex Administratum. Volume 5 No. 9. (2017).

I Made Aditya Dwi Arista & I Wayan Parsa. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Visum et Repertum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekerasan di Dalam Rumah Tangga”. Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum. Volume 5 No. 5 (2018).

Leni Sasmita Sari dan Arsyad Aldyan. “Pembuktian Dakwaan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Dengan Visum Et Repertum (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Salatiga Nomor 34/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Slt)”. Jurnal Verstek. Volume 11 No. 1 (2023).

Mas Dhanis Taufiqurrahman Suhardianto dan Muhammad Rusli Arafat. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Visum et Repertum Dalam Proses Persidangan Perkara Pidana Ditinjau Dari Hukum Acara Pidana”. Jurnal Hukum POSITUM. Volume 7 No.1. (2022).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i4.78474

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.