URGENSI PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERSIDANGAN TINDAK PIDANA ELEKTRONIK

Hizkia Andhitya Wijaya, Muhammad Rustamaji

Abstract

This article analyzes the urgency of the evidentiary process in electronic criminal trials. This study aims to determine the importance of the evidentiary process in an electronic crime trial where in an electronic crime the evidence submitted is not only tangible but intangible evidence. This research is a normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. The legal material collection technique used in this study is the document study technique or library study technique. The collection of legal materials is carried out through document studies and literature studies. Based on the results of the research, it shows that proof in electronic crime is the main thing, because in the proof what is sought is material truth, that a crime has occurred and it is the defendant who is guilty of committing it. The court is bound by a rule or methods or provisions of evidence as stipulated in the law. Legitimate evidence must be carried out in court in accordance with the procedures or methods that apply in the law of evidence.

Keywords: Evidence, Electronic Crime, Criminal Procedure law

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bakhri, Syaiful. (2012). Beban Pembuktian Dalam Beberapa Praktik Peradilan. Depok: Gramata Publishing.
Bastianto Nugroho. (2017). Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut Kuhap. Yuridika. 32(1). 17-36

Hamdi, S. and Suhaimi, M., 2013. Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(4). 25-31

Hamzah, Andi. (2011). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar

Hanafi, Pamuji R. (2019). Urgensi Keterangan Ahli Sebagai Alat Bukti Berdasarkan Sistem Grafika.

Hartono. (2010). Penyidikan & Penegakan HukumPidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hiariej, E. O. (2012). Teori & Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga

Rahmanto, T.Y., Kav, J.H.R.S. and Kuningan, J.S., 2019. Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Berbasis Transaksi Elektronik. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 19(1),31-51

Heryogi A, Ruba'i M, dan Sugiri B. (2017). Fungsi Bukti Elektronik Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/Puu-Xiv/2016. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan. 2(1). 7-17

Pratiwi, F.M.N. and Yulianti, S.W., 2022. Penilaian Kekuatan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penyebarluasan Konten Pornografi Melalui Media Sosial. Verstek, 10(1). 59-67.

Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Al’Adi. 10(1). 81-90

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Ronaldo Ipakit. (2015). Urgensi Pembuktian Alat Bukti Dalam Praktek Peradilan Pidana. Lex Crimen. 4(2) 88 - 94.

Soedirjo. (1985). Jaksa Dan Hakim Dalam Proses Pidana. Jakarta: CV AkademikaPressindo.

Syaiful Bakhri. (2009). Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Praktik Peradilan Pidana, Pusat Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum (P3IH). Jakarta: Media Total.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i3.73615

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.