KESESUAIAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 1/Pid.Sus-Anak2022/PN BYL DENGAN UU SPPA

Azzam Zaid Muharam, Bambang Santoso

Abstract

This writing analyzes the suitability of the judge's considerations in imposing a prison sentence of two years and three months of job training for children with Article 71 paragraph (3) and Article 79 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System. In Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Byl it is known that there has been a criminal act of sexual intercourse with a child, which was committed by a child. Child offenders are subject to Article 81 paragraph (2) of Law Number 17 of 2016 concerning Stipulation of Government Regulation in lieu of Law Number 1 of 2016 regarding the second amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection. The Child Protection Act can be applied to anyone, regardless of whether the offender is an adult or a child. So to protect child perpetrators, the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System is enacted. The purpose of this writing is to find out whether the judge's considerations in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Byl are in accordance with the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System. As a result, the judge in his considerations before making a decision had considered Article 71 paragraph (3) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System.

 Keywords: Consideration; Intercourse; Child

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdul Manan. Etika Hakim dalam Menyelenggarakan Peradilan: Suatu Kajian dalam Sistem Peradilan Islam, cet.ke-1. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group. 2007, hlm 124.

Andika Wijaya dan Wida Peace Ananta. Darurat Kejahatan Seksual. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2016, hlm 94-95.

Briliansyach Sovia Chareena. Kesesuaian Pertimbangan Hakim Menjatuhkan Pidana Penjara Kepada Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Dengan Pasal 79 Uu Sppa (Studi Putusan Nomor: 6/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Sgn). Jurnal Verstek. Vol. 20 No. 1. 2022, hlm 151.

Lilik Mulyadi. Hukum Acara Pidana; Normatif, Teoretis, Praktis, dan Permasalahannya. Bandung: PT. AlumniMulyadi, Lilik. Seraut Wajah Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. 2014, hlm 193

Marlina. Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia, Pengembangan Konsep Diversi Dan Restorative Justice, Cetakan kedua. Bandung: Refika Aditama. 2012, hlm 1.

Mashirul Anwar dan Ridho Wijaya. "Fungsionalitas dan Implikasi Asas Kepentingan Terbaik bagi Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tanjung Karang".Jurnal Hukum. Vol.22, No.2. 2019, hlm 266.

Nikmah Rosidah. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Negeri Lampung. 2019, hlm 1.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. 2014, hlm 41.

Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/Pn Byl

R. Soesilo. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta komentarnya Lengkap Pasal demi Pasal. Bogor: Politeia. 1998, hlm 209.

Rini Fitriani. Peranan Penyelenggara Perlindungan Anak Dalam Melindungi dan Memenuhi Hak- Hak Anak. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan. Volume 2, Nomor 2. 2016, hlm 251.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Anak

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak

Undang-undang Nomor 17 tahun 2016 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti

Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang perubahan kedua atas Undang-undang Nomor 23 tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i3.73217

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.