KESALAHAN PENERAPAN HUKUM SEBAGAI ALASAN KASASI TINDAK PIDANA TURUT SERTA MEMALSUKAN SURAT SECARA BERLANJUT

Arief Agha Raflyansyah, Ismawati Septiningsih

Abstract

This legal research aims to find out the misapplication of the law by the District Court Judge as the reason for the Public Prosecutor's cassation against the acquittal in the criminal case of participating in forging letters related to the provisions of Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the suitability of the Supreme Court's consideration in examining and deciding the Public Prosecutor's cassation in Supreme Court Decision Number 1086 K/Pid/2022. This legal research is a prescriptive and applied normative legal research with a case study approach. The source of legal material for this research comes from primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used is document study or literature study. The technique of analyzing legal materials in this study uses the syllogism method with deductive thinking patterns. The results of the research and discussion obtained are that the Public Prosecutor can prove the suitability of the reasons for cassation submitted by him with the reasons for cassation contained in Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely in terms of whether it is true that a legal rule is not applied or applied improperly. Therefore, the Supreme Court granted the cassation of the Public Prosecutor and found the defendant guilty of committing the crime charged, then imposed a prison sentence of 6 (six) month.

Keywords: Cassation, Mail Forgery, Acquittal Decision.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adami Chazawi dan Ardi Ferdian. Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan : Tindak Pidana yang Menyerang Kepentingan Hukum Terhadap Kepercayaan Masyarakat Mengenai Kebenaran isi Tulisan dan Berita yang Disampaikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.

Andi Sofyan dan Nur Azisa. Hukum Pidana. Makassar: Pustaka Pena Press, 2016.

Deri Setiawan. “Kasasi Penuntut Umum Terhadap Putusan Bebas Perkara Penadahan Karena Judex Facti Salah Menerapkan Hukum (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 104 K/Pid/2015).” Jurnal Verstek 5, no. 1 (2017).

Eric Guntur Surya Amijaya. “TELAAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH AGUNG MEMUTUS PERMOHONAN KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM KARENA JUDEX FACTI MENILAI TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN SECARA BERLANJUT SEBAGAI PERKARA PERDATA.” Jurnal Verstek 8, no. 3 (2020).

Hanindito Arfebi Setyono. “Tinjauan Kasasi Penuntut Umum Atas Dasar Salah Menjatuhkan Sanksi Pidana Oleh Judex Factie Dalam Perkara Illegal Fishing.” Jurnal Verstek 5, no. 2 (2017).

Hariyanto. “KONSEP PENYERTAAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN MENURUT KUHP.” Jurnal Kertha Semay 9, no. 12 (2021).

HM. Soerya Respationo dan M. Guntur Hamzah. “Putusan Hakim: Menuju Rasionalitas Hukum Refleksif Dalam Penegakan Hukum.” Jurnal Yustisia Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta 2, no. 2, Mei-Agustus 2013 (2013).

I Gede Eka Suantara dkk. “Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Secara Bersama-Sama.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 3, no. 1 (2022).

Leden Marpaung. Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1992.

Maman Budiman. “Electronic Signature in Provening the Criminal Act of Forgiveness.” Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) 5, no. 3 (2022).

M. Yahya Harahap. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010. Moelyatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 1993.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1086 K/Pid/2022.

Rasyid Ariman. Hukum Pidana. Palembang: Unsri Per, 2013.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahunn 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Wayan Santosa. “INTERPRETASI KERUGIAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN SURAT.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana 5, no. 1 (2016).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i3.73134

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.