KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA GUGATAN PERCERAIAN

Yeni Novitasari, Harjono Harjono

Abstract

This article examines the strength of evidence of witness testimony de auditu in the case of a divorce lawsuit in Decision Number 110/Pdt.G/2020/PN Skt and Decision Number 82/Pdt.G/2021/PN Bln. The purpose of this article is to find out the strength of evidence of De Auditu's Testimonium Witness in the divorce lawsuit case in that Decision. Based on this research, the panel of judges based on the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court Decision number 308 K/Pdt/1959 that testimony de auditu couldn’t be used as direct evidence but could be used as evidence of presumption (vermoeden), and as a basis for proving something. In addition, the Supreme Court in decision number 239 K/Sip/1973 justified de auditu testimony except as evidence that meets the material requirements if the witness gives testimony under oath, the statement is accepted as independent evidence reaching the minimum limit of proof without other evidence if the de auditu witness consists of several people. Although it is free proof, in this case the testimony of the witness is important so that the strength of evidence is decisive evidence because de auditu witnesses played a major role in the granting of the Plaintiff's claim.

 

Keywords: Divorce; Evidence; Testimonium de Auditu

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdillah, Yasin Yusuf. “NILAI PEMBUKTIAN TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU DALAM PERKARA PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA “. Diakses pada tanggal 3 Juni 2022 pukul 17.09 WIB. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/nilai- pembuktian-testimonium-de-auditu-dalam-perkara-perceraian-di-pengadilan- agama-oleh-yasin-yusuf-abdillah-s-h-i-m-h-2-1.

Aldilla, Fiqi Amalia, Soehartono, dan Heri Hartanto. “Perbandingan Asas Testimonium De Auditu di Pengadilan Agama dan Pengadilan Negeri Pada Perkara Perceraian dengan Alasan Pertengkaran Terus Menerus.” Jurnal Verstek Vol. 4 No. 3 (2016): 93-105, https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v4i3.38768

Atoilah, Ahmad Nabil dan Bayu Alif Ahmad Yasin. "Kesaksian Non Muslim dalam Perkara Perceraian menurut Pendapat Hakim di Pengadilan Agama Bandung" ISTINBATH Vol 16, No 1, (2021): 87-114

Asmuni. “Testimonium De Auditu Telaah Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata Dan Fiqh”Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 3, No 2 (2014): 191-202

Asnawi, M. Natsir. Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Perdata di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2013.

Faisal, Tgk. “Eksistensi Testimonium De Auditu Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Menurut Pandangan Hukum Acara Perdata Dan Fiqh Al- Syāfi’iyyah.” Jurnal Al-Mizan Vol. 4 No. 1 (2017): 82-106

Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Mantili, Rai, dan Samantha Aulia Lubis. “Pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri terhadap Gugatan Perceraian yang tidak dapat Diterima (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) dalam Praktik.” ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol. 3, No. 1, (2017): 111-134

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2021.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberti Yogyakarta, 2002.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2013.

Rasyid, Roihan A. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2013.

Sari, Novita Dyah Kumala dan Syafrudin Yudowibowo. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Persangkaan Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Pada Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama.” Jurnal Verstek Vol. 4 No. 3 (2016): 146-155

Sururie, Ramdani Wahyu. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Testimonium De Auditu Dalam Perkara Perceraian.” Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 7 No. 2 (2014): 137-155

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i4.72572

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.