TELAAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN BEBAS TERDAKWA TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 799/PID.B/2021/PN JAMBI)

Muhammad Dedy, Bambang Santoso

Abstract

This article aims to examine and find out the suitability of the considerations of the judge who handed down an acquittal in a fraud crime case with article 183 in conjunction with article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This article uses normative or doctrinal legal methods that are prescriptive and applied. The approach used in this article is a case approach. The use of legal materials includes primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials uses library research by collecting legal materials related to the problem to be studied. The law material analysis technique used is the syllogism method which uses a deductive mindset. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it shows that in Decision Number 799/Pid.B/2021/PN Jambi, the considerations of judges who handed down acquittals in cases of fraud were in accordance with Article 183 in conjunction with Article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This is because the Prosecutor's evidence is still very minimal through the evidence of witnesses and letters to find material truth in this case. In addition, based on the results of the examination at trial the Judge was of the opinion that the second and third elements of Article 378 of the Criminal Code in the Public Prosecutor's indictment were not legally fulfilled so that the Judge handed down an acquittal against the Defendant.

Keyword: Judge's Consideration; Evidence; Acquittal Verdict; Fraud

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amrudi. “Kajian Yuridis Atas Beban Pembuktian Unsur Pasal Dakwaan Penuntut Umum Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Penipuan.” Juripol Vol. 1, no. No. 2 (2018).

Andi Hamzah. Hukum Acara Pidana. Cet. Ke-12. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.

Anton Hendrik S, Nian Qisthi K. “Tightening Loose Ends in Eradicating Card Fraud (Reviewing Card Skimming Case Verdict in Denpasar Indonesia).” Social and Humaniora Research Symposium Vol. 307, no. No. 1 (2018).

Avianty Nindita P, Caroline Augustine, Edy Hartanto. “ARGUMENTASI HUKUM HAKIM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN BEBAS PADA PERKARA PENIPUAN.” Jurnal Verstek Hukum Acara Vol. 3, no. No. 2 (2015).

Darwan Prinst. Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Praktik. Jakarta: Djambatan, 1998.

Eddy O.S. Hiariej. Teori Dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.

Fajar Nugrahadi. “KAJIAN YURIDIS PEMBUKTIAN BERDASARKAN ALAT BUKTI PETUNJUK DALAM PERKARA PENIPUAN.” Verstek Vol. 7, no. No. 1 (2019).

Hendrika Beatrix Aprilia Ngape. “Akibat Hukum Putusan Hakim Yang Menjatuhkan Putusan Diluar Surat Dakwaan Penuntut Umum.” Justitia Jurnal Hukum Vol. 2, no. No. 1 (2018).

Muhammad Husni Mubaraq. “ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DAN PENGGELAPAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor : 2019/Pid.B//2018/PN.Mdn).” JURNAL RECTUM Vol. 3, no. No. 2 (2021).

Mohammad Salim Hafidi. “Analisis Yuridis Putusan Bebas Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan Cek Kosong (Putusan Nomor: 561/PID.B/2016/PN.BJM).” Skripsi Universitas Jember, 2017.

M Yahya Harahap. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, Dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005. Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2014. Ramelan. Hukum Acara Pidana: Teori Dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Sumber Ilmu Jaya, 2006. Rusli Muhammad. Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jambi Nomor 799/PID.B/2021/PN.JMB.

Puspitasari Rusdi, Muhadar, Haeranah. “CRIMINAL LIABILITY AGAINST PERPETRATORS OF FRAUDULENT CRIMINAL ACT BY HYNOSIS.” Tadulako Law Review Vol. 5, no. No. 1 (2020).

Rex Richard Sanjaya, Weppy Susetiyo. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PERKARA NOMOR 482/Pid.B/2018/PN Blt.” Jurnal Supremasi Vol. 10, no. No. 1 (2020).

Sahrial. “Terdakwa Kasus Penipuan Pembelian Puluhan Ribu Sak Semen Divonis Bebas.” METROJAMBI.COM, 2022. https://metrojambi.com/read/2022/12/09/68690/terdakwa- kasus-penipuan-pembelian-puluhan-ribu-sak-semen-divonis-bebas.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana/KUHP)

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana/KUHAP)

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Warmiyana Zairi Absi, Martini, Rusniati. “Imposing Restorative Justice Sanctions on Online Loan Users Who Commit Criminal Fraud and Compensating Online Loan Victims Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.” International Journal of Social Science Research and Review Vol. 6, no. No. 2 (2023).

Wirjono Prodjodikoro. Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu Di Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2003.

Yunita Savira Budiarti. “Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Menjatuhkan Putusan Diluar Dakwan Penuntut Umum (Studi Putusan MA 784 K /Pid.Sus/2018).” Jurnal Verstek Hukum Acara Vol. 9, no. No. 3 (2021).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i4.72440

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.