PEMENUHAN HAK RESTITUSI TERHADAP ANAK KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA EKSPLOITASI EKONOMI DAN SEKSUAL

Wahyu Rida Setyani, Kristiyadi Kristiyadi

Abstract

This article analyzes the fulfillment of the right of restitution for child victims who are victims of criminal acts of economic and sexual exploitation. The purpose of this article is to find out the fulfillment of the right of restitution for victims of the crime of economic and sexual exploitation of children based on the study of decision number: 331/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Yyk. This article is a normative legal research with a prescriptive nature and uses primary and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials is to use a literature study with a case approach. The analysis technique used is the syllogistic method using a deductive mindset. The results of the research show that the victim's child gets the fulfillment of the right of restitution in the amount of IDR 81,650,000.-. The Yogykarta District Court judge's decision has an element of legal certainty, because the charges that have been put forward before the trial are proven legally and convincingly for the judge in making his decision. The judge's decision also reflects a sense of justice, it is said that because of the impact it has on the victim, namely the victim has to pay for medical treatment and the psychological impact has been balanced by a criminal decision that has stipulated the granting of restitution to the victim's child.

Keyword: Exploitation; Restitution; Victim

Full Text:

PDF

References

Budi Suhariyanto. “Quo Vadis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Melalui Restitusi (Perspektif Filsafat, Teori, Norma dan Praktek Penerapannya)”. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 2, no. 1 (2013).

Didiek M, Arief Mansur dan Elisatris Gultom. Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan: Antara Norma Dan Realita. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.

Dien Kalpika Kasih. “Efektivitas Pemberian Restitusi Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban”. Jurnal Idea Hukum 4, no. 1 (2018).

Fauzy Marasabessy. “Restitusi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana: Sebuah Tawaran Mekanisme Baru”. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, no. 1 (2015).

Gatot Gunarso dan Wiwik Afifah. “Konsep Layanan Pendidikan Anak Terlantar Sebagai Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara”. DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 12, no. 23 (2016).

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)

Ismail, Ahmad, dan Melanie Pita. Memahami Tindak Pidana Eksploitasi Seksual Anak Sebagai upaya perlindungan terhadap anak. Malang: Madza Media, 2021.

Lies Sulistani. Urgensi Peningkatan Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Jakarta: Bidang Hukum, Diseminasi, dan Humas Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, 2011.

Lili Rasidi dan B. Arief Sidharta. Filsafat Hukum Madzab dan Refleksi. Bandung: Remaja Rosida Karya, 1994.

Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Premada Media Group, 2019. Zulkifli

Mahrus Ali dan Ari Wibowo. “Kompensasi dan Restitusi yang Berorientasi pada Korban Tindak Pidana”. Jurnal Yuridika 33, no. 2 (2018): 267.

Muladi. HAM Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2020. Peter

Noer Indriati. “Pengembangan Model Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Korban Perdagangan Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 14, no. 3 (2014).

Rena Yulia dan Aliyth Prakars. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan Praktik Kedokteran Ilegal”. Jurnal Yudisial 13, no. 1 (2020): 57

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.