PENGGUNAAN SAKSI VERBALISAN PADA PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PENCURIAN DALAM KEADAAN YANG MEMBERATKAN

Novita Iskawati, Putri Mahadewi

Abstract

This article analyzes the use of verbal witnesses at proving the case of theft in a situation that burdens the Decision Number 45/Pid.B/2021/PN Wng. The purpose of this article was to determine the compatibility between the use of verbal witness thereof theft in a situation that burdens the provisions of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Law of the Criminal Procedure or Book of the Crime Law of the Crime Event (KUHAP). This writing uses normative legal research methods that are prescriptive and applied with a case approach. The type of legal material used is primary and secondary legal material, in terms of document literature studies or literature, and techniques for legal material analysis using the deductive cylogism method. The results showed that the compatibility of the use of verbal witnesses in proving the case of theft in a situation that burdens in Decision Number 45/Pid.B/2021/PN Wng with KUHAP based on the provisions of Article 163 KUHAP where the witness’s information at the trial is different from investigation report, so the chairman of the panel of judges can ask information about the difference, in this case the judge asked to present verbal witness and the position of verbal witness in proving the error more to complementary evidence that doesn’t stand alone and become clue evidence in accordance the Article 184 KUHAP.

Keywords: Clue; Proving; Verbal Witness.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdul Wahid dan Abdullah Junaedi. “Urgensi Saksi Verbalisan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana (Studi Putusan Nomor. 329/Pid.B/2020/PN Dgl)”. Maleo Law Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, (2022): 43. https://doi.org/10.31934/mlj.v6i1.2361

Alfian Alfandi dan Fadli A. Natsif. “Kekuatan Keterangan Saksi Verbalisan Ditinjau dari Segi Pembuktian”. ALDEV Alauddin Law Development Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, (2022): 137. https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v4i1.1694

Andi Hamzah. 2009. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Andi Sofyan. 2014. Hukum Acara Pidana: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Azharia Putty Alamanda. “Kesesuaian Penggunaan Saksi Verbalisan serta Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan”. Jurnal Verstek, Vol. 5, No. 3, (2017): 103. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v5i3.33524

Djoko Prakoso. 1988. Alat Bukti dan Kekuatan Pembuktian di dalam Proses Pidana. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Gremy Meika Yonea, dkk. “Tinjauan Yuridis Kedudukan Saksi Verbalisan dalam Perkara Pidana”. Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 10, No. 2, (2021): 191. https://doi.org/10.32503/mizan.v10i2.1726

Hari Sasangka, dan Lily Rosita. 2003. Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Henny Elvandari, Burham Pranawa, dan Joko Mardiyanto. “Kedudukan Saksi Verbalisan dalam Proses Pemeriksaan di Persidangan”. Jurnal Bedah Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 2, (2020): 18. https://doi.org/10.36596/jbh.v4i2.451

Lia Daniati Nababan, Erdianto, dan Ferawati. “Kedudukan Saksi Verbalisan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana”. JOM Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, Vol. 5, No. 2, (2018): 9.

Lilik Mulyadi. 2014. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia: Perspektif, Teoritis, Praktik, Teknik Membuat, dan Permasalahannya. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

M. Yahya Harahap. 2016. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2021. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Vebi Shinta Monica, Ali Rahman, dan Azriadi. “Peranan Saksi Verbalisan sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Pemeriksaan di Persidangan (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Bukittinggi IB)”. Sumbang 12 Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2022): 109.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.