PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENYATAKAN GUGUR PERMOHONAN PRAPERADILAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NO. 1/PID.PRA/2019/PN.PNM)

Diah Ayu Sulistyaningrum, Moch Pring Musibatawi

Abstract

This article analyzes the considerations judge's for dismissing the pre-trial in Court Decision Number 1/pid.pra/2019/Pn.Pnm. The purpose of this article is to determine whether the judge's considerations in declaring the pre-trial application for Court Decision Number 1/pid.pra/2019/Pn.Pnm in accordance with Article 82 paragraph (1) letter d of Criminal Law Procedure Code jo Decision of Constitutional Court Number 102/PUU-XIII/ 2015. This reseaarch is a normative reseacrh that is both prescriptive and applied. A case study approach was used in the research. Techniques for gathering data through library research. The legal sources used are primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study showed that The judge's consideration for declaring the nullity of pre-trial application in Court Decision Number 1/pid.pra/2019/Pn.Pnm is accordane with Article 82 paragraph (1) letter d Criminal Procedure Code and Decision of Constitutional Court Number 102/PUU-XIII/2015, because the first trial was held regarding the subject matter.

Keywords: Pretrial; Judge's Consideration; The Nullity of Pre-trial

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.

Arhjayanti Rahim, “Praperadilan Sebagai Control Profesionalisme Kinerja Penyidik”. Jurnal Pelangi Ilmu 5 no. 1 (2012), https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/JPI/article/view/901

Harjono Tjitrosoebono, Komentar DPP Peradin Terhadap KUHAP.Jakarta, 1987.

Made Wire Darme, “Kajian Peran Lembaga Praperdilan Dalam Pengawasan Horizontal Aparat Penegak Hukum.” Jurnal Vestek 1 no. 3 (2013): 81-90

Mellanie R. Y. Parengkuan, Roy R. Lembong, and Vonny A. Wongkar, “Pengimplementasian Hukum Pidana Terhadap Lembaga Praperadilan Dikaitkan Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM)” Lex Administratum 10 no.1 (2022): 219-228, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/38316

M. Karjadi dan R. Soesilo, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) dengan Penjelasan Resmi dan Komentar. Bogor: Politeia, 2016.

M.Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaansidang pengadilan, banding, kasasi, dan peninjauan kembali. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016

Nur Basuki Minarno, “Authorities of Preparation and Hospitality of Applications for Post-Conditions Post-Decision of Constitutional Court”.Yuridika35 No 1(2020): 75-92

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 102/PUU-XIII/2015

Riadi Asra Rahmad, Hukum Acara Pidana. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2019

Rusman Sumadi, “Praperadilan Sebagai Sarana Kontrol Dalam Melindungi Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Tersangka. ”,Jurnal Hukum Sasana 7 No.1 (2021): 149-162, https://ejurnal.ubharajaya.ac.id/index.php/SASANA/article/view/597/491

Sahri sebayang, “Praperadilan Sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Perlindungan Hak-Hak Tersangka Dalam Pemeriksaan Di Tingkat Penyidikan (Studi Pengadilan Negeri Medan).” Jurnal Hukum Kaidah 19 no. 2 (2020): 329-383, https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/jhk/article/view/2445

Tumian Lian Daya Purba, "Praperadilan Sebagai Upaya Hukum Bagi Tersangka." Papua Law Jurnal 1 no. 2 (2017): 253-270, https://www.neliti.com/publications/279196/praperadilan-sebagai-upaya-hukum-bagi-tersangka.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasan Kehakiman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i2.72058

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.