KAJIAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM PADA TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN OLEH ANAK DITINJAU DARI SPPA

Tiara Maharani Maharani, Kristiyadi Kristiyadi

Abstract

This Article was created with the aim of finding out whether the judge’s decision handed down against the child perpetrator of continued obscenity is in accordance with the provisions of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Act. This research is a normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. Using primary and secondary legal materials. With Case Approach. The types and sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is a library study. The legal material analysis technique uses the deductive syllogistic method or syllogistic deduction. The results of the study show that the judge in passing judgment on the child perpetrators of obscenity continues in accordance with the law on the juvenile criminal justice system.

Keywords: Perpetrator’s child, judge’s decision, fornication; child criminal justice system

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andi Hamzah. 2015. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika: Jakarta.

Ariyani, Vivi. 2010. Seputar Perkembangan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. Sofmedia: Jakarta.

Bambang Purnomo. 2018. ‘’Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Anak sebagai Pelaku Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Studi Kasus di Polres Tegal)’’. Jurnal Hukum Khairah Ummah, Vol. 13. No. 1, Maret 2018, hlm. 47

Darwin, Prinst. 1997. Hukum Anak Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung Edisi Pertama.

Erlyta Azizka Septiana. 2021. ‘’ Hambatan Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan di Polres Karanganyar’’. Universitas Sebelas Maret, Solo. Recidive, Jurnal Verstek, Vol. 10. No. 3, September- Desember 2022. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/recidive/article/view/58958

Fitri Yani, Ardian Perangin. 2019. ‘’ Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Pelaku Pencabulan (Studi di Kepolisian Resor Tebing Tinggi).’’ Universitas Potensi Utama: Medan, Jurnal Lex Justitita, Vol. 1 No. 1. Hlm. 66 – 67.

Gultom, Maidin. 2006. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak. Raflika Aditama Bandung.

Immaculata A.K. 2014. ‘’ Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencabulan oleh Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Klaten No. 35/Pid.Sus-Anak/2014/PN. Kln).’’ Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jurnal Verstek Bagian Hukum Acara, Vol. 8 No. 1.Hlm.160–166.

John E.B. Myers. 1985.‘’The Legal Response To Child Abuse: InThe Best Interest Of Children’’.
University of Louis ville School of Law.United States. Journal of Family Law. Vol.24

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang- Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak dan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2016 tentang Perlindungan Anak (Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak).

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2005. Penelitian Hukum. Surabaya: Prenada Media Group.hlm. 181-183.

Punianti. 2003. Analisa Situasi Sistem Peradilan Anak (Juvenile Justice System). UNICEF – Indonesia: Jakarta.

Putusan Nomor: 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN. Mjl

Rogers,P.,Davies, M.,and Cottam L.2010. ‘’Prepetrator Corecion, Victim Resistance and Respodent Gander: their impact and blame attributions in ahypothetical child sexual abusecase. ‘’Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Reasearch, Vol.2 No.3.

Satino, Yuliana Yuli W, and Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba etc.2022. ‘’Legal Protection Against<span id="page19R

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i2.71768

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.