TELAAH CELAH PEMENUHAN PIDANA DENDA DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM BAGI PENGEDAR NARKOTIKA

Wiwik Diah Muliasih, Itok Dwi Kurniawan

Abstract

The severity of the crimes imposed in narcotics crimes is in fact unable to eradicate its circulation and illicit trafficking. The purpose ofthe study was to examine the loopholes in the fulfillment of criminal fines for narcotics dealers in Decision Number: 19/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Krg. Themethod usedis normative legal research. The results of the research study show that the sentence imposedinaquocaseis in accordance with the provisions of the criminal procedure law in the Criminal Procedure Code. Nevertheless, the sentencing ruling that was handed down still seems to leave a loophole in sentencing, namely when the concept of imposing a finewith a substitute prison sentence causes a bad formulation because the purpose of the conviction is notappleto apple. In this case, the purpose of the fine is to deprive him of wealth while the penalty of imprisonment is aimed at depriving him of liberty. Such criticisms in particular can be observed

in the lens of theoretical legal development and practical legal development.

Keywords: Dealers; Fine; Narcotics Crimes

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aditya Dio Pradana dan Bambang Santoso. Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Oleh Jaksa Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Jurnal Verstek 6, no. 1 (2018): 18-26, https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v6i1.39092.

Anthony Bottoms. Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Edited by Andrew Ashworth and Martin Wasik. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Azis, A., Syahrial, I., Basri, H., Handriani, A., Khairiyati, F. “Proses Hukum Pidana Penyalahgunaan Kejahatan Narkotika”. Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 1, no. 1 (2022): 8–22, http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/JBH/article/view/17822.

Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana: Masalah Pemidanaan Sehubungan dengan Perkembangan Delik-delik Khusus dalam Masyarakat Modern. Bandung: Alumni, 1992.

Crome, Ilana., & Nutt, D. Drugs, Drug Harms and Drug Laws in the UK: Lessons from History. In G. Ikkos & N. Bouras (Eds.), Mind, State and Society: Social History of Psychiatry and Mental Health in Britain 1960–2010 (pp. 239-250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.

Dwi Yudi Setiawan. “Handling Of Minor Crime Cases (Tipiring) Through Restorative Justice As An Effort To Overcome Overcapacity Of Prisoners”. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences 3, no.4 (2022): 1440-1444, https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i4.453.

Dewi Yuliati. “KARTINI: SANG PENYIBAK FAJAR NASIONALISME INDONESIA”. Jurnal Sabda 12, no. 1 (2017): 17-27, https://doi.org/10.14710/sabda.v12i1.15250.

Elly Sudarti dan Sahuri Lasmadi. “Harmonisasi Sistem Pemidanaan dan Tujuan Pemidanaan Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suap”. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum: Pandecta 16, no. 1 (2021): 173-185, https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v16i1.27516.

Faisal dan Muhammad Rustamaji. Hukum Pidana Umum. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Thafa Media, 2020.

Ilham Panunggal Jati Darwin. “IMPLIKASI OVERCAPACITY TERHADAP LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN DI INDONESIA”. Jurnal Cepalo 3, no. 2 (2019): 77-84, https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v3no2.1847.

Mas Hushendar. Efektivitas Pidana Denda dalam Perkara Narkotika. Badan Peradilan Umum, Mahkamah Agung 6 (2020): 1-5, https://badilum.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel-hukum/2981-efektivitas-pidana-denda-dalam-perkara-narkotika.html

Masyhuri Imron, MA dkk. Survei Nasional Penyalahgunaan Narkoba Tahun 2021. Jakarta Timur: Pusat Penelitian, Data, dan Informasi Badan Narkotika Nasional Republik Indonesia, 2022.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenanda Media Group, 2014.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Karanganyar Nomor: 19/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Krg

Raden Rara Rahayu Nur Raharsi, Supanto dan Muhammad Rustamaji. “Eksistensi Sanksi Pidana Denda dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Narkotika di Indonesia”. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 3, no. 2 (2019): 115-134, https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i2.253.

Rastra Prasetyo Aditiyono. “KEBIJAKAN REFORMULASI PIDANA PENGGANTI DENDA DALAM MENANGGULANGI TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 DI PENGADILAN NEGERI PONTIANAK”. Jurnal Mahasiswa S2 Hukum UNTAN 1, no. 1 (2017): 1-17, https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v1i1.126.

Renny Gladis Karina. “PEMINADAAN TERHADAP PENGEDAR SEKALIGUS PECANDU NARKOTIKA DALAM PERSPEKTIF TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN”. Badamai Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2019): 354-368, https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v4i2.9247.

Rico Aldiyanto Batuwael, Olga A. Pangkerogo dan Anna S. Wahongan. 2020. Fungsi Pidana Denda dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, Vol. IX, No 3, hlm. 93-103. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/29841.

Rusli Muhammad. Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.

Suisno. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERANTARA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009”. Jurnal Independent 5. no. 2 (2017): 69-80, https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v5i2.75.

Undang Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika

Yati Nurhayati, Ifrani dan M.Yasir Said. “METODOLOGI NORMATIF DAN EMPIRIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF ILMU HUKUM”. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) 2, no. 1 (2021): 1-20, https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i2.71603

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.