ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MENGABULKAN KASASI TERDAKWA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2959/K/PID.SUS/2022)

Yaying Prabaswara, Bambang Santoso

Abstract

This study analyzesthe criminal procedural law related to the consideration of the Supreme Court which granted Cassation guilty in the Narcotics case in accordance with Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the consideration of the Supreme Court whichannulled theJudex Factie decision and tried himself according to Article 256 jo 255 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Supreme Court set an acquittal in this case because there were legal clues and facts that showed the Defendant was innocent. The research method used is normative legal research which is both perscriptive and applied with case studies. The way to collect legal materials is by studying the literature and legal  materials used, namely primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of research and discussion to answer the problem, it can be concluded that the reasons for cassation submitted by the Defendant were in accordance

with Article 253 paragraph (1) letter a of the Criminal Procedure Code because in the reasons for cassation, theJudex Factiedecision had misapplied the law, ignoring facts and instructions indicating that the Defendant not guilty. The Supreme Court's considerations in granting the Defendant's cassation were in accordance with Article 256 jo 255 of the Criminal Procedure Code granted the cassation and annulled the Judex Factiedecision and the trial itself declared the convict not legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a crime of Narcotics. The Supreme Court has restored the Defendant's rights in terms of ability, position and dignity.

Keywords: defendant's cassation; Narcotics; Consideration of the Supreme Court;

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anggara Suryanagara, Alvi Syahrin, M. Hamdan, Jelly Leviza. 2016. “Dakwaan Batal Demi Hukum Setelah Pemeriksaan Pokok Perkara Dalam Sidang Pengadilan (Studi Putusan Nomor 19/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Sim)”. USU Law Journal. Vol.4, No.2 (Maret 2016) 204-220. Medan: Universitas Sumatra Utara.Hlm 124.

Fransiska Novita. 2011. “Bahaya Penyalahgunaan Narkoba Serta Usaha Pencegahan Dan Penanggulangannya”. Jurnal Hukum. Vol. 25. No. 1. Jakarta: FH Univ. MPU Tantular.36 Verstek Jurnal Hukum Acara. 11(2): 028-037 E-ISSN: 2355-0406

Hamzah Andi. 2008, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Harun. M. Husein. 1992. Kasasi Sebagai Upaya Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Kartika Irwanti, Nur Rochaeti,Pujiyono. 2016. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 3/Pid.Sus/A/2015/PN CN)”. UNDIP Law Jurnal. Vol. 5 No. 3 (2016). Semarang:Universitas Diponegoro.Hlm 14.

Kela, Doni Albert. 2015. "Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang No.35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika." Lex Crimen 104. Vol. IV/No. 6/Ags/2015

M. Karjadi dan R.Soesilo. 1988. Kitab Undang-Undang Acara Pidana Disertai Dengan Penjelasan Resmi dan Komentar. Bogor : Politea.

Nurhafifah dan Rahmiati. 2015. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terkait Hal Yang Memberatkan Dan Meringankan Putusan”. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. No. 66 Th. XVII (Agustus, 2015), pp. 341-362. Banda Aceh: Universitas Syiah Kuala.

Simamora, Janpatar, 2014, “Kepastian Hukum Pengajuan Kasasi Oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum Terhadap Vonis Bebas (Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 114/PUU-X/2012).” Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 7 No. 1 (April 2014: 1-17).

Syahid Prakoso. “Kesesuaian Penggunaan Dakwaan Subsidair Oleh Penuntut Umum Dalam Perkara Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Dengan Ketentuan Kuhap (Studi Putusan Nomor 44/Pid.Sustpk/2018/Pn Mdn)”. Jurnal Verstek 10 no. 1 (2022) : 56-57

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.