PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM ATAS PERUBAHAN STATUS PKWT MENJADI PKWTT DALAM SENGKETA PHK PUTUSAN NOMOR 52/PDT.SUSPHI/2023/PN YYK

Nesha Fadilla, Itok Dwi Kurniawan

Abstract

This research analyzes how the Panel of Judges determined the change in employment status from a Fixed-Term Employment Agreement (PKWT) to an Indefinite-Term Employment Agreement (PKWTT) in a case of unilateral termination of employment (PHK) by the employer, as ruled in Decision Number 52/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2023/PN Yyk. The research method used is normative legal research. Legal materials were collected through literature and document studies, consisting of both primary and secondary legal sources. The findings reveal that the judges appropriately concluded that the employment relationship between the parties did not fulfill the objective and administrative requirements mandated by legislation. Consequently, the employment agreement was legally transformed into a PKWTT, as regulated in Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 concerning Fixed-Term Employment Agreements, Outsourcing, Working Hours and Rest Periods, and Termination of Employment. The permanent nature of the work and the absence of PKWT registration served as the legal grounds for the judges to declare that the employment relationship was converted by operation of law into a PKWTT. This decision reflects a commitment to worker protection and demonstrates a progressive and fair interpretation of labor law. Therefore, the judicial considerations in this case are deemed consistent with the principles of legality and protection embedded in Indonesian labor law

Keywords

Judicial Consideration; PKWT; PKWTT

Full Text:

PDF

References

Annisa, FN. ”PERANAN HAKIM SEBAGAI PENEGAK HUKUM BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 48 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN.” Jurnal Lex et Societatis 5, no. 3 (2017): 157-166.

Any, S. H., & Zaeni Asyhadie, Penyelesaian Hubungan Industrial dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja. Mataram: Sanabil, 2019.

Dewi Lestari. ”Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pekerja Kontrak dalam Perspektif UU Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 54, no. 1 (2023): 93-106.

Fadila, L. F. M. “Analisis Yuridis Putusan Nomor 14/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021/PN.Mtr tentang PHK bagi Pekerja Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu.” Private Law, 3(3) (2023): 754-762.

Kambey, G. S. ”PERJANJIAN KERJA WAKTU TERTENTU (PKWT) BERDASARKAN HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN.” Lex Privatum 9(6) (2021): 130-140.

Octavia, C., & Lie, G. ”TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PEKERJA PKWT YANG DIPEKERJAKAN SECARA TERUS-MENERUS.” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli (JSH), 6(2) (2023): 833–841, https://doi.org/10.47647/jsh.v6i2.2032

Pamungkas, F. A. S., & Irawan, A. D. ”PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEKERJA AKIBAT PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA DIMASA PANDEMI COVID-19.” AJUDIKASI, 5(1) (2021): 99– 108, https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v5i1.3390

Pandu Dewanto. ”REKONSTRUKSI PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP PUTUSAN SENGKETA PERDATA BERBASIS NILAI KEADILAN.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 5, no. 2 (2020): 305-323.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2022.

Rahmawati Kusuma & A. D. Basniwati. ”Hak Pekerja Yang Mengalami Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021.” The Juris 6(2) (2022): 328-334.

Wildan Suyuti Mustofa, Kode Etik Hakim. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2013.

Zaeni Asyhadie & Rahmawati Kusuma, Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Dalam Teori dan Praktik di Indonesia. Jakarta Timur: Prenadamedia Group, 2019.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v13i4.103939

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.