KEDUDUKAN HUKUM OBJEK JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN YANG DILETAKKAN SITA JAMINAN OLEH PENGADILAN DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 43/Pdt.Bth/2023/PN Skh

Khoirunnisa Mustika Dewi, Arsyad Aldyan

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal position of a Mortgage Right guarantee object that is subsequently placed under a security seizure by the court in Decision Number 43/Pdt.Bth/2023/PN Skh. The purpose of this article is to further examine the legal position of the Mortgage Right Guarantee object as a guarantee whose holder is prioritized by law based on Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights. The findings prove that the Mortgage Right holder, as a separate creditor, has precedence in carrying out the execution of its object compared to other creditors. However, if a security seizure is placed by the court on the Mortgage Right object, the law does not explicitly regulate the legal position of the guarantee object. The jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, in this case, provides legal certainty regarding this issue, thereby reaffirming the legal position of the Mortgage Right guarantee object that is placed under a security seizure.

Keywords

Mortgage Right; Security Seizure; Separate Creditor; Legal Standing; and Jurisprudence

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abhishek Negi. Arsyad. 2022. The Model of Law Enforcement Based on Pancasila Justice. The Model of Law Enforcement Based on Pancasila Justice. Vol. 2. No. 3.

Fitki Ayu. Ananda. 2015. Dilematis Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Melalui Parate Executie dan Eksekusi Melalui Grosse Akta. Jurnal Repertorium. Vol. 2. No. 2.

Made Dermawan. I. 2018. Upaya Hukum Terhadap Kreditor atas Objek Hak Tanggungan dari Upaya Sita Jaminan oleh Pihak Ketiga Dalam Kepailitan. Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu. Vol. 10. No. 2.

Maxeiner, James R. (Fall 2008). "Some realism about legal certainty in globalization of the rule of law”. Houston Journal of International Law, diambil dari Wikipedia Bahasa Indonesia, ensiklopedia bebas.

Monica Michelle, dkk. 2024. Tinjauan Yuridis Titel Eksekutorial Dalam Parate Eksekusi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996. Jurnal Lex Privatum. Vol. 14. No. 3. Manado: Universitas Sam Ratulangi.

Rambe Ropaun. 2002. Hukum Acara Perdata Lengkap. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Ratnapala, Sudi. 2009, Jurisprudence, Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.

Subekti, R. 1989. Hukum Acara Perdata. Bandung: Bina Cipta.

Sudarsono. 2007. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sunandar Nandang. 2018. Kepastian Hukum Bank Eksekusi Objek Hak Tanggungan yang Menjadi Sengketa Ketenagakerjaan. Jurnal Aktualia. Vol. 1. No. 2. Bandung: Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Bandung.

Tengku, Vivi Lia Falini. Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi Objek Hak Tanggungan yang Diletakkan Sita Jaminan (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 211/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim). Medan: Program Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah.

Winni, dkk. 2022. Kedudukan Objek Jaminan dengan Dibebani Hak Tanggungan yang Dipersengketakan oleh Pihak Ketiga (studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 85

8 K/Pdt/2021). Jurnal Normatif. Vol. 2 No. 2. Medan: Fakultas Hukum Al Azhar. Wiwin, Sandyana Abdurochman. 2019. Tinjauan Yuridis Implementasi Conservatoir Beslag (Sita Jaminan) Dalam Putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.G/2018/PN Mjl. Jurnal Presumption of Law. Vol. 1. No. 1. Majalengka: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Majalengka.

Yahya Harahap. M. 2009. Hukum Acara Perdata: Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Yurisprudensi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Putusan No.394K/Pdt/1984 tanggal 31 Mei 1985

Yurisprudensi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.3216 K/Pdt/1984 tanggal 28 Juli 1986

Yurisprudensi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.1326 K/Sip/1981 tanggal 19 Agustus 1982

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v13i4.100213

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.