The Impact of Village Public Service Transformation Policy Implementation on SDGs Achievement: A Study of Village Governments in Banyumas Regency
Abstract
The acceleration of globalization and modernization requires traditional villages to transform to face structural and ecological challenges. This study aims to analyze the impact of the implementation of village public service transformation policies on the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Banyumas Regency. Through a descriptive quantitative approach, primary data were collected from 76 respondents consisting of village officials and related stakeholders using a Likert-scale questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted using logistic regression techniques using the Python programming language. The results indicate that descriptively, the implementation of public service transformation is in the fairly good category, but hypothesis testing revealed no statistically significant effect on SDG achievement. This is evidenced by a p-value of 0.5478 (> 0.05) and a very low Pseudo R2 (McFadden) value of 0.0040. These findings indicate a "broken link" between administrative modernization and real welfare indicators. The main obstacles identified include discrepancies in human resource competencies, limited digital infrastructure, and institutional inertia. This study concludes that service transformation at the village level remains procedural and has not significantly driven sustainable development targets. Substantial capacity building and more inclusive public participation are needed for village autonomy to have a real impact on achieving the SDGs.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abidin, M. Z. (2015). Tinjauan atas pelaksanaan keuangan desa dalam mendukung kebijakan dana desa. Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Publik, 6(1), 61–76.
Adisasmita, R. (2006). Pembangunan Pedesaan dan Perkotaan. Yogyakarta: Graha ilmu.
Basri, Y.M. Findayani, T.I. Zarefar, A. (2021). Implementation of good governance to im- prove the performance of village governments, J. Akunt. 11 (2) (2021) 123–136, doi: 10.33369/j.akuntansi.11.2.123-136.
BPKP. (2015). Persiapan implementasi UU No 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa . 2015. http://www.bpkp.go.id/puslitbangwas/konten/2473/14.127 -Persiapan- Implementasi-UU-No-6-Tahun-2014-Tentang-Desa#: ∼:text = Pembangunan desa adalah upaya peningkatan.manusiaserta penanggulangan kemiskinan melalui.
Breuer, A, Malerba, D., Srigiri, S., & Balasubramanian, P. (Eds.). (2023). Governing the interlinkages between th.e SDGs: approaches, opportunities. and challenges. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003254683.
Breuer, A., Janetschek, H., & Malerba, D. (2019). Translating Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interdependencies into policy advice. Sustainability, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072092.
Candel, J. J. L. (2017). Holy Grail or inflated expectations? The success and failure of integrated policy strategies. Policy Studies, 38, 519–552. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01442872.2017.1337090.
Candel, J. J. L., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49, 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-0169248-y.
Coste, A.I. Tudor, A.T. (2013). Service performance - between measurement and information in the public sector, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 92 (2013) 215–219 Lumen, doi: 10. 1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.662.
Eisenmenger, N. Pichler, M. Krenmayr, N. Noll, D. Plank, B. Schalmann, E. Gin- grich S. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals prioritize economic growth over sustain- able resource use: a critical reflection on the SDGs from a socio-ecological perspec- tive, Sustain. Sci. 15 (4) (2020) 1101–1110 .
Elder, M. Olsen, S.H. (2019). The Design of Environmental Priorities in the SDGs, Glob. Policy 10 (2019) 70–82.
Fukuyama, F. (2016). Governance: What Do We Know, and How Do We Know It? Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpolisci-042214-044240.
Hernowo, B. (2004). Kajian Pembangunan Ekonomi Desa Untuk Mengatasi Kemiskinan. Artikel Jurnal, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Jiao, W. Fuller, A.M. Xu, S. Min, Q. Wu, M. (2016). Socio-ecological adaptation of agricultural heritage systems in modern China: three cases in Qingtian County, Zhejiang Province, Sustainability. 8 (12) (2016) 1260.
Junaedi, J. Dikrurohman, D. Abdullah, A. (2023). Analysis of social change in rural communities due to the influence of urbanization and globalization in Indonesia, Edunity: Soc. Educ. Stud. 2 (3) (2023) 431–441.
Junaedi. (2022). Implementation of village governance based on the principles of good gov- ernance of public service in Indonesia, J. Human. Soc. Sci. Stud. 4 (1) (2022) 51–59, doi: 10.32996/jhsss.2022.4.1.5.
Kabar Desa. (2021). Ini Rincian Dana Desa Tahun 2021 . https://katadesa.id/index. php/dari- desa- ke- desa- 1/359- ini- rincian- dana- desa- tahun- 2021.
Leininger, J., Dombrowsky, I., Messner, D., Breuer, A., Ruhe, C., H., J., & LotzeCampen, H. (2018). Governing the transformations towards sustainability. In E. Kriegler, D. Messner, N. Nakicenovic, K. Riahi, J. Rockström, J. Sachs, S. van der Leeuw, & D. van Vuuren (Eds.), Transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals (pp. 107-126). International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).
Liu, Y. Dai, L. Long, H. Woods, M. Fois, F. (2022). Rural vitalization promoted by industrial transformation under globalization: the case of Tengtou village in China, J. Rural. Stud. 95 (2022) 241–255.
Matondang, A., (2015). Pembinaan Aparatur Pemerintah dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas di Bagian Umum Sekretariatan Kantor Bupati, Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial PolitikUMA,, 3 (2): 160-174.
Munck af Rosenschöld, J., Rozema, J. G., & Frye-Levine, L. A (2014). Institutional inertia and climate change: A review of the new institutionalist literature. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5, 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/ wcc.292.
Pangemanan, S. (2017). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pembangunan desa, J. Eksek. 1 (1) (2017).
Sachs, J.D. Lafortune, G. Fuller, G. Drumm, E. (2023). Implementing the SDG Stimulus. Sustainable Development Report, Dublin University Press, Dublin, 2023, https:// doi.org/10.25546/102924. Paris: SDSN.
Saragih, R. (2019). Kegagalan Dana Desa karena Ketidaksiapan Aparat . https:// www.beritasatu.com/archive/544465/kegagalan- dana- desa- karena- ketidaksiapan- apparat.
Sugiyono (2019), Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Edisi ke-2 Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017/11/02).). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239. 38(6), 553–570.
Trein, P., Meyer, I., & Maggetti, M. (2018). The Integration and Coordination of Public Policies: A Systematic Comparative Review. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21, 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13876988.2018.1496667.
Ugland, T., & Veggeland, F. (2006). Experiments in Food Safety Policy Integration in the European Union*. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00637.x.
Wijaya, A.F. Andryanto, D. Wike, W. (2020). Managing women’s village activists participa- tion in village development planning, J. Governance 5 (2) (2020), doi: 10.31506/ jog.v5i2.8915.
Yevmieshkina, O.L. (2019). Public participation in the produce of territorial development strategies in Ukraine, Dev. Mech. Good Governance Ukraine (2019) 203–223, doi: 10. 36059/978- 966- 397- 114- 8/203- 223.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.










