Quantitative Analysis of Post-Bureaucratic Organizational Culture Dynamics in the Regional Secretariat of Brebes Regency

Muhammad Ilham Amrul Arifin

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of organizational culture from a post-bureaucratic governance perspective at the Brebes Regency Regional Secretariat. This study was motivated by demands for bureaucratic reform that lead to more adaptive, collaborative, and results-oriented governance. The study employed a descriptive quantitative approach, involving 52 State Civil Apparatus (ASN) within the Regional Secretariat as respondents. Data collection was conducted through a structured questionnaire based on the main dimensions of post-bureaucratic culture: flexibility, collaboration, participation, and innovation orientation. The data obtained were then analyzed descriptively using SPSS to generate a mean value, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum scores. The analysis results showed a mean value of 78.25 with a standard deviation of 7.438 and a score range of 63 to 90. Based on the classification using the theoretical interval approach, employee perceptions of the implementation of post-bureaucratic culture tended to be positive. Most respondents demonstrated work behavior patterns aligned with post-bureaucratic principles, particularly in the aspects of collaboration and openness to innovation. In general, the organizational culture at the Brebes Regency Secretariat reflects the adoption of post-bureaucratic values. However, its implementation remains hybrid. On the one hand, the organization retains Weberian characteristics such as formal hierarchy and regulatory compliance. On the other hand, daily work practices are beginning to demonstrate increased collaboration, the use of digitalization, and a drive for innovation. Therefore, strengthening organizational culture through transformational leadership and systematic performance measurement are crucial steps to ensure that cultural transformation truly impacts the quality of public services.

Keywords

Civil Servants; Organizational Culture; Post-Bureaucratic Governance

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adam, A. M. (2020). Sample Size Determination in Survey Research. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 26(5), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2020/v26i530263

Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert Data. Journal of Extension, 50(2). https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=33962a54-7359-351c-9630-4b7526e978a9

Compton, M. E., & Meier, K. J. (2017). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management Bureaucracy to Postbureaucracy : The Consequences of Political Failures. February 2018, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.127

Creswell, J. W. (2023). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=0c1fa629-0611-38de-b831-20dc41c83eb3

Dash, S. S., & Padhi, M. (2020). Relevance of Max Weber’s Rational Bureaucratic Organizations in Modern Society. Management Revue, 31(1), 81–91. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26996602

Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and Sampling Methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149

Faedlulloh, D. (2023). Model for Post-Pandemic Bureaucracy in Indonesia : Is Post-Bureaucracy Relevant ? 19(148), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v19i3.1228

Farazmand, A. (2024). Governance Reforms: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly, and the Sound—Examining the Past and Exploring the Future of Public Organizations. In Comparative Governance Reforms : Assessing the Past and Exploring the Future (Vol. 52, pp. 29–53). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70306-5_3

Gnambs, T., & Kaspar, K. (2017). Socially Desirable Responding in Web-Based Questionnaires: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Candor Hypothesis. Assessment, 24(6), 746–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115624547

Grimm, P. (2010). Social Desirability Bias. In Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057

Hair, J. F. (1944-)., & pbl, P. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis / Joseph F. Hair [et al.]. In Bibliogr. przy rozdz. Indeks. Pearson Education Limited. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=d870e819-5946-3d6a-8457-c638d82185a8

Hamdhita, Djoko Widodo, & Radjikan. (2023). Analisis Budaya Organisasi Dalam Peningkatan Pelayanan Administrasi Kependudukan (Studi Pada Kelurahan Pucang Sewu Kecamatan Gubeng Kotasurabaya Jawa Timur). 3(4), 167–177.

Heckscher, C. C., & Donnellon, A. (1994). The Post-bureaucratic organization: new perspectives on organizational change. In Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 32, pp. 32–2229). American Library Association. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-2229

Hood, C., Dixon, R., & Hawes, D. (2015). A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less?: Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government. HAL CCSD. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=ba9f1edf-475b-30dc-bc0c-d6ddcfa5ace1

Johnson, Phil, Wood, Geoffrey, Brewster, Chris, & Brookes, Michael. (2009). The Rise of Post-Bureaucracy: Theorists’ Fancy or Organizational Praxis? International Sociology, 24(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580908100246

Maqdliyan, R., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Antecedents and consequences of public sector organizational innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100042

Mcdonnell, E. M. (2025). Bureaucracy in Action : The Sociology of Public Administration. 191–211.

Mudhoffar, K., & Frinaldi, A. (2024). Transformasi Budaya Organisasi dalam Mendorong Perilaku Inovatif Pegawai Negeri Sipil : Studi Kasus di Sektor Publik Indonesia. 2(4), 611–619.

Osborne, S. P. (2022). Public service logic : creating value for public service users, citizens, and society through public service delivery. First isseud in paperback. https://research.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=9a851448-d4d1-342d-b7a2-30416ce6aa02

Pollitt, C. (2009). Bureaucracies Remember, Post-Bureaucratic Organizations Forget? 87(2), 198–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01738.x

Prabhaker, M., Chandra, M. P., Uttam, S., Anshul, G., & Sahu, C. (2017). Descriptive Statistics and Normality Tests for Statistical Data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 20(4), 456–458. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA

Rahmat, B., Hartanto, B., & Hilman, A. (2024). Journal of Local Government Issues ( LOGOS ) Bureaucratic Reform in Indonesia : From “ Public Administration “ to “ Public Management “. 7(2), 144–158.

Regina Dinda Ayu, Veithzal Rivai Zainal, & Aziz Hakim. (2023). Development Of Organizational Culture In Public Services : Case Study Of Government Agencies In Indonesia. 4(5), 9987–9993.

Sager, F., & Rosser, C. (2021). Weberian Bureaucracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.166

Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2019). The Concept of Bureaucracy by Max Weber. 7(2), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v7i2.3979

Taherdoost, H. (2018). Determining Sample Size; How to Calculate Survey Sample Size. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2(February 2017), 237–239. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3224205

Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, Their Applications, Types, and Limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538

van de Mortel, T. F. (2008). Faking It: Social Desirability Response Bias in Self-report Research. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(4), 40–48. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.210155003844269

Watkins, M. W. (2021). A Step-by-Step Guide to Exploratory Factor Analysis with SPSS. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003149347

Waza, A. M. (2025). Rethinking Bureaucracy : Agile Governance in the 21 st Century. 3(6), 355–362.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/sp.v21i1.110967

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.