Strategi inovasi smart city Ibu Kota Negara yang berkelanjutan (Studi kasus di lima kota dunia)

Raden Roro Intan Dwi Nuraini

Abstract

Kota dan teknologi tumbuh bersama seiring waktu. Seiring dengan pertumbuhan tersebut, kota menghadapi tantangan seperti penurunan kualitas lingkungan, dinamika sosial, serta ketimpangan ekonomi. Konsep inovasi smart city dinilai potensial untuk diterapkan sebagai wujud pemberdayaan Ibu Kota Negara (IKN) yang berkelanjutan. International Institute for Management Development tahun 2023 menyatakan bahwa Singapura, Canberra, Copenhagen, Helsinki, dan Oslo memiliki peringkat dan strategi inovasi smart city terbaik yang dapat dijadikan sebagai best practice untuk pembangunan IKN. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan analisis isi dengan metode eksploratif untuk memahami secara mendalam dan mendeskripsikan hubungan dan strategi inovasi smart city untuk IKN yang berkelanjutan dengan best practice dari lima kota dunia. Dalam hasil penelitian ini, strategi inovasi smart city dibagi menjadi tiga pilar, meliputi smart environment, smart community, serta smart economy. Pembagian pilar ini berlandaskan kepada kebutuhan dasar dalam pembangunan ibu kota yang holistik dan berkelanjutan serta Rencana Induk Ibu Kota Negara.

Keywords

Ibu Kota Negara; Inovasi; Smart City; Sustainable

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1]Badan Pusat Statistik. Proyeksi Penduduk Indonesia 2020-2050 : Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020 2023.

[2]Höjer M, Wangel J. Smart Sustainable Cities: Definition and Challenges, 2015, p. 333–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_20.

[3]de Azambuja LS, Pereira GV, Krimmer R. Clearing The Existing Fog over The Smart Sustainable City Concept. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2020, p. 628–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428595.

[4]Al Hashemi AAA. Smart Cities and Their Impact on Economic Sustainability: A Contemporary View Within the Framework of Concepts and Experiences. Sociology International Journal 2022;6:364–70.

[5]Schipper R, Silvius A. Characteristics of Smart Sustainable City Development: Implications for Project Management. Smart Cities 2018;1:75–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities1010005.

[6]Hameed AA. Smart City Planning and Sustainable Development. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2019;518:022042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/518/2/022042.

[7]Presidential Regulation. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 63 Tahun 2022 tentang Perincian Rencana Induk Ibu Kota Nusantara 2022.

[8]Presidential Regulation. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 64 Tahun 2022 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Kawasan Strategis Nasional Ibu Kota Nusantara Tahun 2022-2042 2022.

[9]International Institute for Management Development. Smart City Index 2023.

[10]Swedberg R. Exploratory Research 2020.

[11]Mwita K. Strengths and Weaknesses of Qualitative Research in Social Science Studies. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478) 2022;11:618–25. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i6.1920.

[12]Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage publications; 2016.

[13]Snyder H. Literature Review as A Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. J Bus Res 2019;104:333–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

[14]Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage publications; 2018.

[15]Government of Singapore. Department of Statistics Singapore 2023 2023. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/.

[16]Adnan YM, Hamzah H, Dali MM, Daud MN, Alias A. Comparative Overview of Smart Cities Initiatives: Singapore and Seoul. International Real Estate Researchers Symposium (IRERS). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, April, 2016.

[17]Willems T, Graham C. The Imagination of Singapore’s Smart Nation as Digital Infrastructure: Rendering (Digital) Work Invisible. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 2019;13:511–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-8005194.

[18]Google. Map Data 2024 n.d.

[19]Chia ES. Singapore’s Smart Nation Program- Enablers and Challenges. 2016 11th System of Systems Engineering Conference (SoSE), IEEE; 2016, p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSOSE.2016.7542892.

[20]Smart Nation and Digital Government Office. Smart Nation: The Way Forward 2018.

[21]Brinkhoff T. City Population. Available Online: www City-Population De 2017.

[22]Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Bureau of Statistics 2022 2022. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/.

[23]ACT Goverment. A Leading Digital City: Action Plan 2014-2018 2014.

[24]Copenhagen Solution Lab. City Copenhagen 2016.

[25]Peštová V. Sustainable Urban Development: Case Study Copenhagen. EDAMBA 2021 : COVID-19 Recovery: The Need for Speed : Conference Proceedings, University of Economics in Bratislava; 2022, p. 390–9. https://doi.org/10.53465/EDAMBA.2021.9788022549301.390-399.

[26]Cristea CV, Alexandru D, Suleski D, Birsan A. Copenhagen as a Smart City. Proceedings of the International Management Conference, vol. 9, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania; 2015, p. 622–32.

[27]Jablonska AJ. Smart Cities in Practice: A Comparative Case Study between Warsaw, Gdynia, Copenhagen and Malmö. A Public Actor’s Perspective with a Secondary Focus on Collaboration and Digitization 2018.

[28]Jiang H, Geertman S, Witte P. Smart Urban Governance: An Alternative to Technocratic “Smartness.” GeoJournal 2022;87:1639–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10326-w.

[29]Jaakola A, Vass T, Saarto S, Haglund L. Helsinki Facts and Figures. 2023.

[30]Hämäläinen M. A Framework for a Smart City Design: Digital Transformation in the Helsinki Smart City, 2020, p. 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23604-5_5.

[31]Härkönen K, Hannola L, Pyrhönen O. Advancing the Smart City Objectives of Electric Demand Management and New Services to Residents by Home Automation—Learnings from a Case. Energy Effic 2022;15:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-022-10032-1.

[32]Shamsuzzoha A, Nieminen J, Piya S, Rutledge K. Smart City for Sustainable Environment: A Comparison of Participatory Strategies from Helsinki, Singapore and London. Cities 2021;114:103194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103194.

[33]Antonsen HAV. Platform Infrastructure as A Driver of Smart City Development. Master’s Thesis. University of Oslo, 2017.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v19i2.85258

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.