Sustainable development of Depok Beach, Yogyakarta: System dynamics approach to waste management and maritime economy enhancement

Didi Nuryadin, Jamzani Sodik, Wahyu Dwi Artaningtyas, Indra Wahyu Pratama

Abstract

Depok Beach is a tourist destination in Yogyakarta which has experienced significant development as part of the South Coast National Tourism Strategic Area of Yogyakarta. However, waste management is still the main challenge faced. The objectives of this study is to build a sustainable model for Depok Beach, to estimate the behaviour of the management system, and develop a strategy to promote the maritime economy in the. System dynamics was used for modelling the management strategy. Data were collected through observation and in-depth interviews with related stakeholders. The results showed that Depok Beach will continue to attract more tourists until 2030, but a decrease in visitor numbers is expected to occur after that. It is due to a decrease in the attractiveness value of the beach. Meanwhile, a comprehensive and integrated approach of policy implementation scenarios is needed to yield significant results. The development of Depok Beach required a comprehensive, integrated policy approach.

Keywords

Marine tourism; Sustainable tourism management; System dynamics

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1]Setyaningrum A, Setyorini HB, Masduqi E. Strategi Pengembangan Pariwisata Berbasis Sumber Daya Alam Pesisir dan Laut di Pantai Depok Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Kebijakan Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan Dan Perikanan 2018;7:179. https://doi.org/10.15578/jksekp.v7i2.3953.

[2]Yogyakarta DPDI. Rencana Induk dan Rencana Detail Kawasan Strategis Pariwisata Nasional (KSPN) Pantai Selatan (Pansela) DIY dan sekitarnya 2016.

[3]Nawawi A. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Wisata Pantai Depok di Desa Kretek Parangtritis. Jurnal Nasional Pariwisata 2013;5:103–9.

[4]Brouder P. Creative Outposts: Tourism’s Place in Rural Innovation. Tourism Planning & Development 2012;9:383–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2012.726254.

[5]Pafi M, Flannery W, Murtagh B. Coastal Tourism, Market Segmentation and Contested Landscapes. Mar Policy 2020;121:104189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104189.

[6]Wei W, Alvarez I, Martin S. Sustainability Analysis: Viability Concepts to Consider Transient and Asymptotical Dynamics in Socio-Ecological Tourism-Based Systems. Ecol Modell 2013;251:103–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.10.009.

[7]Ronoatmojo AR, Ciptono WS. Valuasi Pantai Depok Kabupaten Bantul pada Tahun 2017. Tesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2018.

[8]Priatmoko S. Analysis of Marketability, Sustainability, Participatory and Disaster Mitigation (MSP+DM) for The Development of Rural Community-Based Tourism (CBT) Destinations Case study: Depok beach, Bantul, Yogyakarta. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2018;202:012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/202/1/012032.

[9]Zanker M, Štekerová K. A Decade of System Dynamics Modelling for Tourism: Systematic Review. In: Maresova P, Jedlicka P, Firlej K, Soukal I, editors., 2020, p. 881–93. https://doi.org/10.36689/uhk/hed/2020-01-099.

[10]Burger JR, Allen CD, Brown JH, Burnside WR, Davidson AD, Fristoe TS, et al. The Macroecology of Sustainability. PLoS Biol 2012;10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001345.

[11]Sterman J. Business Dynamics, System Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World 2002.

[12]Guan D, Gao W, Su W, Li H, Hokao K. Modeling and Dynamic Assessment of Urban Economy–Resource–Environment System with A Coupled System Dynamics – Geographic Information System Model. Ecol Indic 2011;11:1333–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.007.

[13]Yao H, Shen L, Tan Y, Hao J. Simulating the Impacts of Policy Scenarios on The Sustainability Performance of Infrastructure Projects. Autom Constr 2011;20:1060–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.007.

[14]Sedarati P, Santos S, Pintassilgo P. System Dynamics in Tourism Planning and Development. Tourism Planning & Development 2019;16:256–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2018.1436586.

[15]Firmansyah I, Pramudya B, Budiharsono S. Sustainability Status of Rice Fields in The Rice Production Center of Citarum Watershed. Advances in Agriculture & Botanics 2016;8:13–25.

[16]Tan Y, Jiao L, Shuai C, Shen L. A System Dynamics Model for Simulating Urban Sustainability Performance: A China Case Study. J Clean Prod 2018;199:1107–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.154.

[17]Rusiawan W, Tjiptoherijanto P, Suganda E, Darmajanti L. System Dynamics Modeling for Urban Economic Growth and CO2 Emission: A Case Study of Jakarta, Indonesia. Procedia Environ Sci 2015;28:330–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.042.

[18]Xing L, Xue M, Hu M. Dynamic Simulation and Assessment of The Coupling Coordination Degree of The Economy–Resource–Environment System: Case of Wuhan City in China. J Environ Manage 2019;230:474–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.065.

[19]Kotir JH, Smith C, Brown G, Marshall N, Johnstone R. A System Dynamics Simulation Model for Sustainable Water Resources Management and Agricultural Development in the Volta River Basin, Ghana. Science of The Total Environment 2016;573:444–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.081.

[20]Güneralp B, Seto KC. Environmental Impacts of Urban Growth from an Integrated Dynamic Perspective: A Case Study of Shenzhen, South China. Global Environmental Change 2008;18:720–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.004.

[21]Mavrommati G, Bithas K, Panayiotidis P. Operationalizing Sustainability in Urban Coastal Systems: A System Dynamics Analysis. Water Res 2013;47:7235–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.041.

[22]Sterman JD. Does Formal System Dynamics Training Improve People’s Understanding of Accumulation? Syst Dyn Rev 2010;26:316–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.447.

[23]Kennedy M. Cybernetics and System Dynamics: Impacts on Public Policy. Kybernetes 2011;40:124–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921111117960.

[24]Schwarz N, Haase D, Seppelt R. Omnipresent Sprawl? A Review of Urban Simulation Models with Respect to Urban Shrinkage. Environ Plann B Plann Des 2010;37:265–83. https://doi.org/10.1068/b35087.

[25]Firmansyah I, Widiatmaka, Pramudya B, Budiharsono S. The Dynamic Model of Paddy Field Conversion Control in Citarum Watershed. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2019;399:012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/399/1/012009.

[26]Koliotasi A-S, Abeliotis K, Tsartas P-G. Understanding the Impact of Waste Management on a Destination′s Image: A Stakeholders′ Perspective. Tourism and Hospitality 2023;4:38–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp4010004.

[27]Ramkissoon H. Perceived Social Impacts of Tourism and Quality-Of-Life: A New Conceptual Model. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2023;31:442–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1858091.

[28]Liu Y, Mahmoud M, Hartmann H, Stewart S, Wagener T, Semmens D, et al. Chapter Nine Formal Scenario Development for Environmental Impact Assessment Studies, 2008, p. 145–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-101X(08)00609-1.

[29]Nuryadin D, Sodik J, Artaningtyas WD. A Qualitative System Dynamic Modelling on Sustainable Tourism Development (Case Study: Depok Beach at Bantul Regency). RSF Conference Series: Business, Management and Social Sciences 2021;1:40–6. https://doi.org/10.31098/bmss.v1i3.286.

[30]Klarin T. The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary Issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business 2018;21:67–94. https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2018-0005.

[31]P. de Alencar NM, Le Tissier M, Paterson SK, Newton A. Circles of Coastal Sustainability: A Framework for Coastal Management. Sustainability 2020;12:4886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124886.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v19i2.72068

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.