Pelaksanaan Restitusi Bagi Anak Korban Tindak Pidana Pencabulan

Sinda Rahmawati

Abstract

Children are individuals who are vulnerable to becoming victims of criminal acts that require protection. One form of protection for child victims as an effort to fulfill the rights of victims is the granting of restitution rights. The purpose of conducting this legal research is to find out the implementation and obstacles in granting restitution to District Court of Tanjungkarang case number 29/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Tjk. This research is normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied based on statue approach and case approach. This research employed the data collection technique of literature studies and interviews as research support. The result of the research showed that children who were victims in this case has not received protection in the form of fulfilling the right to restitution even though the defendant has been found guilty of committing the crime of obscenity by the judge. This is due to delays in submitting requests for restitution by the victim's child. So that the victim's child can only reapply for restitution after receiving a court decision that has permanent legal force through a civil lawsuit. However, considering that the filing procedure requires a lot of time, this has become an obstacle to fulfilling the right of restitution for child victims. As a result, can influence implementation of restitution for child victims of abuse in this case.

Keywords

Victim’s Child; Restitusion; Criminal Act of Sexual Abuse

References

Achmad Murtadho. 2020. “Pemenuhan Ganti Kerugian Terhadap Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana Pencabulan (Fulfillment of Restitution for Children who are Victims of Criminal Acts Obscenity)”. Jurnal HAM. Vol. 11 No. 3, Desember 2020. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.

Andi Najemi dan Erwin. 2021. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindakan Pidana Berupa Konpensasi Restitusi dalam Persepektif Perundang-Undang di Indonesia”. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora. Vol. 5 No. 2, Desember 2021. Jambi: LPPM Universitas Jambi.

Bruce R. Jacob. 1970. “Reparation or Restitution by the Criminal Offender to His Victim: Applicability of an Ancient Concept in the Modern Correctional Process”. The Journal Law, Criminology and Police Science. Vol. 61 Issue 2, 1970. Northwestern: Northwestern University School of Law.

Marasabessy Fauzy. 2015. “Restitusi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana: Sebuah Tawaran Mekanisme Baru”. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Tahun ke-45. No. 1.

Miszuarty. 2019. “Pelaksanaan Restitusi Bagi Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana Sebagai Bentuk Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2017”. Soumatera Law Review. Vol 2 No.1, 2019. Padang: Lembaga Layanan Pendidikan Tinggi (LLDIKTI) Wilayah X.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2017 tentang Pelaksanaan Restitusi Bagi Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2021. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Rena Yulia. 2010. Viktimologi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan. Cetakan Pertama. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 dan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2016 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v12i3.72828

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.