PENJATUHAN PIDANA DENDA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN I BAGI DIRI SENDIRI BERDASARKAN PASAL 127 AYAT (1) HURUF A UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 34/PID.B/2014/PN.DPU)

Moh. Aridh Rizky, Budi Setyanto, Sabar Slamet

Abstract

Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji aspek-aspek yang mendasari pertimbangan hakim terhadap  penjatuhan pidana denda sebesar Rp. 800.000.000 (delapan ratus juta rupiah) berdasarkan Pasal 127 Ayat (1) huruf a Undang-undang Narkotika pada putusan Pengadilan Negeri Dompu Nomor 34/ Pid.B/ 2014/ Pn.Dpu tanggal 4 Juni 2014. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskiptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan yaitu pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Jenis data sumber-sumber penelitian yang berupa bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunkan studi kepustakaan atau studi dokumen (library research). Teknik analisa bahan hukum yang digunakan penulis adalah metode analisa kualitatif. Analisa kualitatif yang digunakan bersifat deskriptif dan preskriptif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dihasilkan kesimpulan bahwa, hakim telah membuat pertimbangan yuridis yakni dakwaan Penuntut Umum, keterangan saksi, keterangan terdakwa, barang bukti, pasal-pasal dalam Undang-Undang Narkotika, maupun pertimbangan non yuridis yakni akibat yang ditimbulkan, kondisi terdakwa, serta hal-hal yang memberatkan dan hal-hal yang meringankan Terdakwa. Namun penjatuhan pidana denda sebesar Rp. 800.000.000,- (delapan ratus juta rupiah) yang diputus terhadap Terdakwa M. Qhadafi dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Dompu Nomor 34/Pid. B/ 2014/ PN. Dpu tidak sesuai dengan Pasal 127 ayat (1) huruf a Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika dengan pidana hanya berupa pidana penjara paling lama 4 (empat) tahun bagi yang menggunakan Narkotika golongan 1 bagi diri sendiri.
Kata kunci : Penjatuhan Pidana Denda, Pidana Denda, Narkotika, Narkotika bagi Diri Sendiri.

Abstract
This research aims to know about underlying aspects of judges consideration to convict the imposition of  fine penalty for amount Rp. 800.000.000,- (eight hundred million rupiah) based on Article 127 paragraph (1) subparagraph a Law Number 35 of 2009 about Narcotics in the verdict of District Court of Dompu with registration Number 34/Pid. B/2014/Pn.DPU in date June 4 th, 2014. This research is prescriptive normative legal research. The approach that used are statute approach and case approach. Types of data are research resources in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting data using literature study of library research. Law material analysis technique that used by author is qualitative analysis method. The qualitative analysis that used are descriptive and perspective, which will try to prove existing law material and vote it then analyzes the problems that exist related to convict of under imposition of criminal under the minimum limit that commited by the judge. Based on the result of the research and the discussion, it can be concluded that, the aspects becoming the judge’s consideration basis in convicting under the imposition of criminal under the minimum limit from judge’s rules and the jugde had made consideration, either juridical which was public prosecutor’s prejudgement, the witness’s explanation, the criminal explanation, proofs, sections in drugs law, or non-judicial which was the triggered effect, the criminal condition as well as things which prosecute and defend the criminal. However, the imposition of Rp. 800.000.000,- (eight hundred million rupiah) fine penalty had made by the judge to M. Qhadafi defendant in regulated in drugs law on the District  Court of Dompu verdict No.34/Pid.B/2014/PN Dpu did not suit based on article 127 paragraaph (1) sub paragaraph a, Law Number 35 of 2009 about Narcotics only used Imprisonment for maximum 4 (four)years for who used Group I of Narcotics for himself.
Keywords : Imposition of Criminal Fine, Fine Penalty, Narcotics, Narcotics for theirself.

Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.