HATE SPEECH ACTION ON THE DISCUSSION FORUM COMMENTARY FORUM IN THE FACEBOOK SOCIAL NETWORK "THIS IS KEBUMEN"

Vinsca Sabrina Claudia, Yanuar Rizka Wijayanto

Abstract

Abstract:  Rapid technological advances have greatly influenced the development of communication in society. At present, many speakers do communication without having to meet or face to face. They communicate through social media they have, one of which is Facebook. In general the use of these media is used to contain hate speech. Therefore, the research aims to explain and describe (1) the types of illocutionary speech acts in the Covid-19 discussion forum comments and (2) the forms of hate speech in the Covid-19 discussion forum comments. The methode use in this research is descriptive qualitative. The results of the research indicates the result of the types of illocutionary speech acts with utterances of hatred of the Kebumen community in commenting. Furthermore, the forms of hate speech in comments include forms of provocation, provocation, insults, spreading false news, and unpleasant acts committed by the Kebumen community. The results of this study also show benefits for learners of linguistic theory, especially forensic and pragmatic linguistics.

Keywords

speech act; hate speech; facebook

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afrianti, Desi. (2017). Fungsi Tindak Tutur Pengajar Bimbel dalam Status Facebook tentang Penyambutan Tahun Baru Masehi. Jurnal Puitika: 89-101.

Iginio, Glagiordone, dkk. (2014). Mapping and Analysing Hate Speech Online Opportunities and Challenges for Ethiopia. Britania Raya: University of Oxford.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1993. Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman Inc.

Miles, M, B., Huberman, A. M., and Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis a Methods Sourcebook. California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Moleong, L.J. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdyakarya.

Mutia, Intan., Irfansyah, Puput., dan Adyani, Luh P.W. (2016). Pengaruh Jejaring Sosial Facebook terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika di Universitas. Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika: 136-141.

Nadar, F, X. (2013). Pragmatik & Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Narbuko, C. dan Achmadi, A.(2016). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Searle, J, R. (1976). Speechact: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Retnaningsih, Hartini. (2015). Ujaran Kebencian di Tengah Masyarakat. Kesejahteraan Sosial: Kajian Singkat terhadap Isu Aktual dan Strategis: 9-12.

Permatasari, Devita, I., Subyantoro. (2020). Ujaran Kebencian Facebook Tahun 2017-2019. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia: 62-70.

Piliang, Wilda, S.H.P., Mulyadi. (2020). Identifikasi Ujaran Kebencian Terkait Insiden Penusukan Wiranto. Jurnal Education and Development: Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan: 345-351.

Rahman, Nadhifa Indana Zulfa. (2019). Penggunaan Kata Tabu di Media Sosial: Kajian Linguistik Forensik. Jurnal Semiotika: 120-128.

Sumarlam, dkk. (2017). Pemahaman dan Kajian Pragmatik. Solo: Bukukatta.

Thamrin, Husni., Bachari, Andika, Butha B., dan Rusmana, Erik. (2019). Tindak Tutur Kebencina di Media Sosial berkaitan Delik Hukum Pidana (Kajian Linguistik Forensik). Seminar Internasional Riksa Bahasa XIII: 423-432.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.