CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL MEDIA CONTENT "BEKAL BUAT SUAMI" IN A GENDER PERSPECTIVE

Norma Atika Sari, Eka Yusriansya

Abstract

Abstract: In a patriarchal culture, domestic housework such as cooking, washing, cleaning the house, and taking care of kids are the responsibilities of women. While men are tasked to provide and responsible for the economic needs of the family. This dichotomous sharing duties has been rooted at the level of collective unconsciousness in the community for a long time. The dichotomy of the head of the family - housewife, public - domestic, and rational - emotional stereotype becomes the basis of gender division in Indonesian society.

The different perspective in responding to this sharing housework system triggered a polemic, one of which was the upload of the "Lunch box for Hubby" that became a trending topic on the Twitter platform on June 29, 2020. The polemic began when an account with the user name @rainydecember uploaded a thread showing a photo and recipes with the topic "Bekal buat Suami". The content was described by a narrative text that showed the position of women in the domestic world, specifically as the subject who supply the lunch meal, and men as the recipient of food supplies as well as emphasizing their role as provider in the family construction.

"Lunch box for Hubby" content was examined using Teun A. Van Dijk's critical discourse analysis with a gender approach. The research method chosen was descriptive qualitative. This study aims to describe the analysis of macro (thematic), super structure (schematic), and microstructure structures of the research object. The results of this research found a patriarchal form of discourse reproduced by the choice of language used in the content. The "Lunch box for Hubby" upload legitimizes the division of housework duties based on gender. After all, the misinterpretation in responding and the limited pattern of communication via online/virtual raised new problems including misconceptions, denials, justifications, and even has the potential to create misogynistic groups on the Twitter platform.

Keywords

CriticalDiscourse Analysis; Bekal buat Suami; Social Media Content; Gender; Patriarchy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Engels, Frederick. (1884). Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. Hottingen-Zurich: Marx/Engels Selected Works, Volume Three.

Eriyanto. (2012). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LkiS.

Haryatmoko. (2016). Critical Discourse Analysis (Analisis Wacana Kritis) Landasan Teori, Metodologi dan Penerapan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Humm, Maggie. (2002). Ensiklopedia Feminisme. Yogyakarta : Fajar Pustaka Baru.

Jayani, Dwi Hadya. (2020, February 26). 10 Media Sosial yang Paling Sering Digunakan di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2020/02/26/10-media-sosial-yang-paling-sering-digunakan-di-indonesia

Mahsun, M.S. (2006). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Nadya, Karima Melati. (2019). Membicarakan Feminisme. Yogyakarta: Penerbit EA Books.

Nurlaily, Alfaratna Septi. (2019). Unsur Seksualitas yang Direpresentasikan Tokoh Novel Pasung Jiwa Karya Okky Madasari : Analisis Wacana Kritis Teun

A. Van Dijk. METASASTRA: Jurnal Penelitian Sastra. https://www.scilit.net/article/fbb315a84e734f69b92a48a93da2c9f8

Payuyasa, I. N. (2017). Analisis Wacana Kritis Model Van Dijk Dalam Program Acara Mata Najwa Di Metro Tv. Segara Widya : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Institut Seni Indonesia Denpasar, 5. https://doi.org/10.31091/sw.v5i0.188

Titscher, Stefan. (2009). Metode Analisis Teks dan Wacana. Yogyakatra: Pustaka Pelajar.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.