Evaluasi Sikap Bahasa Calon Presiden pada Wacana Debat Capres 2019: Analisis Appraisal

Dian Marisha Putri

Abstract

Abstract: The general election of 2019 was the biggest democratic party as a source of data obtained from the 3rd and 4th debate segments on March 30, 2019. Debate data is then transcribed and analyzed with Appraisal pattern studies based on three study analyzes, namely: Engagement, attitude, and graduation in the pattern appraisal attitude. The results of DC discourse research consist of: engagement, attitude, and graduation. The pattern of presidential attitudes comes from the self and orders of political parties. Negative attitude as a form of expression of dissatisfaction, injustice, greed, ambition, moral messages and noble values, virtues, the function of the presidential debate as a series of democratic and democratic party. The positive attitude patterns identified in the DC discourse were spoken by Candidates 01 and Candidates 02 which were analyzed based on the presidential debate data that was expressed implicitly or explicitly such as: a) firm attitude, b) doubtful attitude, c) patient attitude, d) attitude optimistic, and d) attitudes towards gender.

Abstrak: Pemilihan umum Tahun 2019 sebagai pesta demokrasi terbesar sebagai sumber data yang diperoleh dari segmen ke-3 dan 4 pada tanggal 30 Maret 2019. Data debat kemudian ditranskripsikan dan dianalisis dengan kajian pola Appraisal berdasarkan tiga analisis kajian yaitu: Engagement, attitude, dan graduasi pada pola sikap appraisal. Hasil penelitian wacana DC terdiri atas: keterlibatan (engagement), sikap (attitude), dan graduasi (graduation). Pola sikap Capres berasal dari diri dan pesanan partai politik. Sikap negatif sebagai bentuk ungkapan ketidakpuasan, ketidakadilan, keserakahan, ambisi, pesan-pesan moral dan nilai-nilai luhur, kebajikan-kebajikan, Fungsi debat capres sebagai rangkaian demokrasi pesta demokrasi. Pola sikap positif yang teridentifikasi pada wacana DC dituturkan oleh Capres 01 dan capres 02 yang dianalisis berdasarkan data debat capres yang diungkapkan secara implisit maupun secara eksplisit seperti: a) sikap tegas, b) sikap ragu-ragu, c) sikap sabar, d) sikap optimis, dan d) sikap terhadap gender.

Keywords

Appraisal, Debat Capres 2019, Sikap.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Berg, Bruce L. 1989, Qualitative Research Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Bungin, B. 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana.

Eriyanto. 2001. Analisis Wacana. Malang: LkiS.

Egginz, Suzanne. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London:Pinter Publisher

Fairlough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: the critical study of language. London:Longman

Fairlough, Norman. 2003. Language and Power: Relasi Bahasa, Kekuasaan dan Ideologi. THE MESSENGER, Volume III, Nomor 1, Edisi Juli 2011 35

Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

Martin, J.R.. (1992). ENGLISH TEXT System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Martin, J.R and Rose, David. 2003. Working With Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.

Miles, M. B dan Huberman, A. M. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI PRESS

Moleong, Lexy J. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Ratna ,Nyoman Kutha. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kajian Budaya dan Ilmu Sosial Humaniora Pada Umumnya .Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar

Sinar, Tengku Silvana, 2010. ”Upaya penelitian dalam merawat Kearifan Lokal.” Harian Analisa Medan. 7 Februari 2010.

Sunarto, Debat Capres Purwa Gaya Yogyakarta, Sebuah Tinjauan tentang Bentuk, Ukiran, Sunggingan, (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1991).

Spradley, James P. 1980. Doing Participants Observation. Participants Observation. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.