“THE PRONUNCIATION IS TOO MUCH”: INDONESIANS IDEOLOGIES TOWARD ENGLISH-INDONESIAN CODE-SWITCHING
Abstract
This study is a pilot study focuses on the observation of the language attitude of Indonesian people toward English-Indonesian code-switching in Indonesia to see the ideology exists behind their attitude. Written questionnaire and interview method is used as a way to observe the language attitude of Indonesian people toward English-Indonesia code-switching. The participants are 15 Indonesians which are randomly selected from several different cities in Indonesia. The data are interpreted based on the institutional language ideology of Indonesia context. Based on the observation, there are two significant findings are found; English is seen as a prestigious language in Indonesia and standard language ideology is revealed through the notion of correctness and authority and the idea of legitimacy.
Keywords: language attitude, language ideology, code-switching
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agheyisi, R.&Fishman, J. (1970): “Language Attitudes: Abrief survey of methodological approaches”. Anthropological Linguistics 12.12(5): 137- 157.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information 16: 645-68.
Chand, Vineeta. (2009). [v]at is going on? Local and global ideologies about Indian English.Language in Society 38: 393-419.
Coupland , N. & Bishop , H. (2007). “Ideologised values for British accents”.Journal of Sociolinguistics11: 74 –93.
Coupland ,N. (2007). Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jaffe, A. (2009). The production and reproduction of language ideologies in practice. In Coupland, Nikolas and Adam Jaworski (eds.), The New Sociolinguistics Reader. Basingstroke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lippi-Green, Rosina (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. London : Routledge.
Milroy, J. (2007). “The Ideology of Standard Language”. In Carmen Llamas, Louise Mullany and Peter Stockwell, (eds). The Routledge Companion to Sociolinguistics. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Sheddon, J. (2003). The Indonesian Language: Its history and role in modern society. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd
Shuck, G. (2004). “Conversational performance and the poetic construction of an ideology”.Language in Society 33: 195-222.
Silverstein, Michael ( 1996 ). Monoglot “standard” in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony . In Donald Brenneis & Ronald K.S. Macaulay (eds.), The matrix of language, 284 –306. Boulder : Westview.
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Warrillow-Williams, David (2001) English influence on the development of Indonesian in the print media, 1966–96. PhD thesis, Griffith University.
Wassink , Beckford A.,& Anne, C. ( 2004 ). “Addressing ideologies around African American English”.Journal of English Linguistics 32: 171 –85.
Woolard, K. A. and B.B. Schieffelin. 1994. Language ideology. Annual Reviews in Anthropology 23:55-82.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.