THE USE OF PERSONAL PRONOUN AS A RHETORICAL STRATEGY IN SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO’S PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH TEXT AT THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY

Rosyida Ekawati

Abstract

This paper concerns with the Indonesian presidential speech in international forum. It examines the use of personal pronoun in political discourse of president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s  in United Nations forum, especially at the General Debate of the 69th Session of the United Nations General Assembly. It was his last chance as the president to deliver his presidential speech at the UN forum. It is descriptive qualitative to deal with the complexities of meanings in social contexts.  In collecting data, the writer uses document method, by reading and re-reading the text, selecting and collecting the data, classifying the personal pronoun, and coding the data. In analyzing data, procedures are finding the types of the personal pronoun used in the speech, describing and explaining the personal pronoun used, and drawing the conclusion based on the data analysis. From the perspective of personal pronoun, the speech text is analyzed to establish how the president associates with and dissociates from actions taken by himself or his officers and Indonesian people at different times and spaces. It can be understood that by locating personal pronoun for certain intended references, the president tries to distinguish and emphazise his action from others. The president also tries to seek his domination on an extraordinary effort to solve the problem in order to convince the audience.

Key words: Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, personal pronoun, president, speech, United Nations

 

Full Text:

PDF

References

Azar, Betty Schrampfer. (1999). Understanding and Using English Grammar. Third Edition. USA:Longman

Adetunji, Akinbiyi. (2006). Inclusion and Exclusion in Political Discourse: Deixis in Olusegun Obasanjo's Speeches. Journal of Language and Linguistics. Volume 5 Number 2, 2006 page 177-191.

Beard, A. (2000). The Language of Politics. London: Routledge.

Beer, Francis A. and Christ’l De Landtsheer, eds., (2004) Metaphorical World Politics. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.

Bramley, Nicolette Ruth. (2001). Pronouns of Politics: The Use of Pronouns in the Construction of ‘self’ and ‘other’ in Political Interviews. Doctoral Thesis. Australian National University.

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.125.4780&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E. & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational Research. 8th edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Gocheco, Paulina M. (2012). Pronominal Choice: A Reflection of Culture and Persuasion in Philippine Political Campaign Discourse. Philippine ESL Journal.

Håkansson, Jessica. (2012). The Use of Personal Pronouns in Political Speeches. A comparative study of the pronominal choices of two American presidents. School of Language and Literature. Linneaus University

Keenan, E. L. (2001). Creating Anaphors: An Historical Study of the English Reflexive Pronouns. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Maalej, Zouhir A. (2013). Framing Manipulation of Person Deixis in Hosni Mubarak’s Last Three Speeches: A Cognitive-Prgamatic Approach. Pragmatics, 23:4. 633 – 659. International Pragmatics Association

Matić, Daniela (2012). Ideological Discourse Structures in Political Speeches. Komunikacija i kultura online. Godina III, broj 3, pp. 54-78

Mayr, Andrea. (2008). Language and Power. An Introduction to Institutional Discourse. London: Continuum

Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversations (Vol. 1 and 2). Oxford: Blackwell.

Scheibmen, Joanne. (2004). Inclusive and Exclusive Patterning of the English First Person Plural: Evidence from Conversation. Language, Culture, and Mind. CSLI Publications

Thomas, J. (1995) Meaning in Interaction: an Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman

Van Dijk, Teun A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/WhatisPoliticalDiscourseAnalysis.pdf, accessed on January 15, 2015

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.