Pengembangan Subject Specific Pedagogy Berbasis PBL Untuk Penguatan Sikap Peduli Lingkungan Siswa Kelas X IPA SMA Negeri Y Karanganyar
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to develop Subject Spesific Pedagogy (SSP) based on Problem Based Learning (PBL) to reinforce student’s environmental attitude in Grade X IPA SMA Negeri Y Karanganyar. This research is a Research and Development. The research design is 4D (four-D) by Thiagarajan. This research model consist of define, design, develop and disseminate. The disseminate phase isn’t use in this research because the purpose of this research only develop product SSP based on PBL. The product’s characteristic is integration of PBL syntax and environmental subject. The validation results from expert judgments showed that 87,1% in RPP (valid), 82,02% in module (valid), 87,6% in LKS (valid) and 91% in problem set (valid). The development testing result from students and teacher showed that 82,6% and 82,5% in module and LKS (valid). New Ecological Paradigm instrument (NEP) data showed that the mean value of all aspect had been improved from 47,92 up to 55,98. Wilcoxon test showed that sig=0,000 < α=0,05 it’s mean there was differences student’s environmental attitude between pre and post treatment. The conclusion of this research showed that SSP based on PBL is valid and proper for Grade X IPA SMA Negeri Y Karanganyar. SSP based on PBL is effective to improve environmental attitude.
Keywords: Environmental attitude, Subject Spesific Pedagogy, Problem Based Learning, NEP
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aini, M. H., Rachmadiarti, F., & Prastiwi, M. S. (2014, Agustus). Penguasaan Konsep Lingkungan dan Sikap Peduli Lingkungan Siswa SMA Adiwiyata Mandiri di Kabupaten Mojokerto. ejournal.unesa.ac.id, 3(3), 479-484.
Ajzen, I. (2001). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Organizational Behaviourand Human Decision Processes, 179-211.
Azwar, S. (2012). Penyususnan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Dunlap, R. E., Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm :A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.
Gage, N. L., & Berliner, D. (1983). Educational Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin,USA.
Holil, A., Handoyo, P., Mustika K S, M., Jatiningsih, O., Wasis, & Soeryanto. (2011). Bunga Rampai Pendidikan Karakter:Strategi Mendidik Generasi Masa Depan. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Kopnina, H. (2011). Applying The New Ecological Paradigm Scale in the Case of Environmental Education:Qualitative Analysis of The Ecological Worldview of Dutch Children. Journal of Peace Education and Social Justice, 5(3), 374-388.
Rahmawati, I., & Suwanda, I. M. (2015). Upaya Pembentukan Perilaku Peduli Lingkungan Siswa Melalui Sekolah Adiwiyata di SMP N 28 Surabaya. Kajian Moral dan Kewarganegaraan, 1, pp. 71-88. Surabaya.
Scott, W. (2015, February ). Public Understanding of Sustainable Development:Some Implications for Education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(2), 235-246.
Soemarwoto, O. (2001). Atur Diri Sendiri Paradigma Baru Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sujarwo. (2011). Model-model Pembelajaran Suatu Strategi Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Venus Gold Press.
Tan, O.-S. (2003). Problem-Based Learning Innovation:Using Problems to Power Learning in the 21st Century . Singapore: Cengage Learning.
Trianto. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Wahana Komputer. (2010). Panduan Alikatif & Solusi (PAS) Mengolah Data Statistik Hasil Penelitian dengan SPSS 17. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Waikato, R. C. (2013). Analysis of The NEP Result. -: www.waikatoregion.govt.nz.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.