Pengaruh Penerapan Blended Learningterhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Prodi. Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UMS pada Mata Kuliah Komputer Analisis Data

Guntur Nurcahyanto

Abstract

The purposes of the research were to know the influence of learning between studentstaught using a blended learning model compared to students taught by face to face learning modelof Student’s Achievement in computer of data analysis courses of academic year 2016/2017. This research is a quantitative research of quasi experimental implemented in computer laboratory of FKIP UMS. The study population was all students of the even semester ofbiology education departement of FKIP UMS who take courses computer of data analysis of academic year 2016/2017. The sample of this study was taken 2 classes from 5 classes by choosing cluster random sampling and  obtained class G and J with the number of 40 students. Data collection techniques using cognitive tests. The analysis technique used is Kruskal-Wallis H test with softwareSPSS version 20.Research resultswere students who received treatment with the learning model Blended Learning has average cognitive learning outcomes of 91.33 greater than the average of cognitive learning achievement with learning models face to face of 79,73. It can be concluded that the influence of using blended learning and face to face learning modelof student’s achievement in computer of data analysis courses.

Keywords

Blended learning, face to face, student’s achievement

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arbaugh, J.B., A. Desai, B. Rau and B.S. Sridhar. 2010. A Review of Research on Online and Blended Learning in the Management Discipline: 1994-2009. Organization Management Journal, 7.Retrieved from goo.gl/90hbu, accessed on Wednesday, March 24, 2017.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bates, A. W. 1995.Technology, Open Learning and Distance Education. London: Routledge.

Dimiyati dan Mudjiono. 2006. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Garrison, D.R., and N. Vaughan. 2008. Blended learning in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Graham, C.R. 2006. “Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions” in Bonk, C.J. and C.R. Graham (ed.). Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. 3-21. San Fransisco: Pleiffer Publishing.

Hamzah, B. Uno.2008. Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Luik, P. 2010. Web Based-Learning or Face-toFace Teaching – Preferences of Estonian Students. Melalui www.aare.edu.au/06pap/lui06159.pdf.diakses 6 Agustus 2017.

Masjid, Abdul. 2013. Startegi Pembelajaran, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

McSporran, M. & King, C. 2005. Blended Is Better: Choosing EducationalDelivery Methods. Retrieved July 22, 2017 from http://hyperdisc.unitec.ac.nz/research/KingMcsporranEdmedia2005.pdf.

Prawiradilaga, Dewi Salma., dkk. 2013. Mozaik Teknologi Pendidikan: E-Learning. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Rusman, Kurniawan D., & Riyana C. 2012. Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi: Mengembangkan Profesionalitas Guru. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Sardiman A.M. 2010. Interaksi dan motivasi belajar dan mengajar, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudjana, Nana. 2009. Meningkatkan Efektifitas Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sudjana, Nana. 2010. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. (Cet. XV). Bandung: PT. Ramaja Rosdakarya, hal 22.

Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, hal 2.

Stein, Jared.,& Graham, C.R. 2014. Essentials for Blended Learning: A Standar Based Guide. USA: Routledge.

Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif , Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Thorne, K. 2003. Blended learning: How to integrate online and traditional learning. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

Wiersma, Wiliam & Jurs, Stephen. G. 2009. Research Methods in Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.