Perbedaan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Antara yang Menggunakan Model Inquiry Based Learning dengan Model Problem Based Learning Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif Dan Impulsif

Nur Farida, Imas Cintamulya

Abstract

One of the higher-order thinking skills that is competence in curriculum 2013 is critical thinking skills. However, in the actual learning process the teacher has not yet empowered the students' critical thinking skills. In addition, other aspects such as cognitive styles have also not been considered. This study aims to examine students' critical thinking differences in terms of reflective and impulsive cognitive styles between those using Inquiry Based Learning model with Problem Based Learning model. The research method used is Quasi experiment that is in experiment class I using Inquiry Based Learning model and experiment class II using Problem Based Learning model. The study sample were 64 students of VII B class and VII C class of SMP Negeri 7 Tuban consist of 22 reflective students and 19 impulsive students. To obtain reflective and impulse cognitive style data is used Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT). The students' critical thinking data in the two experimental classes as a whole was analyzed using the Independent Samples Test or t-test. While the critical thinking data reflective and impulsive students were analyzed using Mann-Whitney test. The results showed that there is no difference ofcritical thinking between students using Inquiry Based Learning model with Problem Based Learning model. Both are equally able to empower students' critical thinking. However, if examined further by cognitive style, there is a difference between the two experimental classes. Model Inquiry Based Learning is better, because critical thinking reflective students with impulsive students.

Keywords

critical thinking,cognitive style, Inquiry Based Learning model, and Problem Based Learning model

Full Text:

PDF

References

Apriana, E., & Anwar. (2014). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dan Inkuiri Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Dampak Pencemaran Lingkungan Terhadap Kesehatan. Jurnal Biotik, 2 (2), 77-137.

Arikunto, S. (2014). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Arnyana, I.B.P. (2006). Pengaruh Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Pada Pelajaran Biologi Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran IKIP Negeri Singaraja, (3), 496-515.

Ennis, R.H. (1985). A Logical Basic For Measuring Critical Thinking Skills. EducationalLeadership, 43 (2), 44-48.

Gunantara, G. (2014).Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas V.Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universits Pendidikan Ganesha,2(1).

Gunawan, A. (2012). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sma Negeri 2 Metro. Skripsi Pendidikan Biologi Fkip Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro.

Malyani, I.P., & Cintamulya, I. (2017). Analisis Berpikir Kritis Siswa yang Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif pada Pembelajaran Biologi melalui Model Think Talk Write (TTW) dengan Media Limbah Pengolahan Hasil Laut.Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 14 (1), 546-550.

Nikmah, I.N., & Cintamulya, I. (2017). Analisis Berpikir Kritis Siswa yang Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif pada pembelajaran Biologi melalui Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) dengan Media Puzzle. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 14 (1), 551-555.

Nur, A., Kundera, I.N., & Tangge, L.N. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri dan Gaya Kognitif Terhadap hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi di Kelas XI IPA MAN 2 Model Palu. E-Jurnal Mitra Sains, 4 (4), 57-66.

Nuraeni, N., & Cintamulya, I. (2017).Memberdayakan Berfikir Kritis Siswa Melalui Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dengan Media Power Point Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 14 (1), 471-475.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia No, 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Kompetensi pada Kurikulum 2013. (2016). Jakarta: Kemdikbud.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia No, 65 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Proses. (2013). Jakarta: Kemdikbud.

Riyana, E. (2012). Gaya Kognitif Dalam Pembelajaran, (Online), http://Endri riyatul.Blogspot.Co.Id/2012/03/Gaya-KognitifDalamPembelajaran.Html? M=1., diakses 14 Februari 2018.

Sanjaya, W. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Septiana, Q.I., & Cintamulya, I. (2017). Analisis Berpikir Kritis Siswa yang Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif pada Pembelajaran Biologi melalui Model Think, Talk, Write (TTW) dengan Media Gambar. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 14 (1), 556-561.

Setyawati, L.R. (2016). Analisis Persamaan dan Perbedaan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry, Discovery, Problem Based Learning, dan Project Based Learning. tugas mata kuliah Telaah kurikulum. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Sufairoh. (2016). Pendekatan Saintifik & Model Pembelajaran K-13. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesional, 5 (3), 122-124.

Suprayitno, A. (2017). Gaya Kognitif, (Online),https://Blog.Igi.Or.Id/Gayakognitif.Html., diakses 14 Februari 2018.

Warli.(2013).Kreativitas Siswa Smp Yang Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif Atau Impulsif Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 20 (2), 190-201.

Warli. (2010). Profil Krativitas Siswa Yang Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif Dan Siswa Yang Bergaya Kognitif Impulsif Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Disertasi. Pps Unesa Surabaya.

Warli. (2010). Instrument Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT). Dok Istru/Warli/2010.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.