Analisis Berfikir Kritis Siswa yang Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Implusif pada Pembelajaran Biologi melalui Model Think, Talk, Write (TTW) dengan Media Gambar

Qonita Iffa Septiana

Abstract

As one of science lessons, biology is expected to be a lesson that can develop students' critical thinking skills. This critical thinking ability is very important in connecting the facts that exist in the natural world, linking principles and theories, raising questions, analyzing other people's opinions, analyzing problems, and solving biological problems. In addition, cognitive style is one important aspect that needs to be considered. Based on this study aims to analyze students' critical thinking skills reflective or impulsive cognitive style through cooperative model TTW (Think Talk Write) with image media. The subjects were 19 students of SMP class VIII C SMP Negeri 1 Merakurak with reflective and impulsive cognitive style. Student cognitive style is measured by MFFT (Matching Familiar Figures Test) developed by Warli (2010). While data for critical thinking is obtained through critical thinking tests by referring to the Ennis (1985) indicator. Furthermore the data of students' critical thinking ability reflective and impulsive cognitive style was analyzed statistically nonparametric by using Mean Whitney test. The results of the study are as follows: students' critical thinking skills with reflective cognitive style tend to be high. While the critical thinking skills of impulsive students tend to be low. The conclusion is that reflective cognitive-style students are better than impulsive cognitive-style students.

Keywords

Critical Thinking Skills, Model TTW, Image Media, Reflective Cognitive Style, And Impulsive Cognitive Style

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ardana,I M. (2008). Peningkatan Kualitas Belajar

Siswa melalui Pengembangan Pembelajaran

Matematika yang Berorientasi pada Gaya

Kognitif dan Berwawasan Kontruktivis. Jurnal

Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan No.1

(1) Juli 2008

Depdiknas. (2006). Standar Isi. Jakarta:

Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006

Ennis, R. H. (1985) An elaboration of cardinal goal of

science instruction, Scientific thinking,

Educational Philosophy and Theory 23 (1), 31-

Johnson, Elaine B. (2007). Contextual teaching and

learning : menjadikan kegiatan belajar mengajar

mengasyikkan dan bermakna. Bandung: Mizan

Learning Center.

Mason, Mark. (2007). “Critical Thinking and

Learning”. Phylopsophy of Education Society of

Australasia.341-343.

Muhfahroyin. (2009). Memberdayakan Kemampuan

Berpikir Kritis Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran

Konstruktivistik. Jurnal Pendidikan dan

Pembelajaran vol 16 no 1 [Online] Tersedia :

(http://www.berpikirkritisblogspot.com). [23

Maret 2017]

Mulyasa, E. (2007). Kurikulum tingkat

satuanpendidikan: Suatu panduan praktis.

Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Munandar, Utami. (2004). Pengembangan Kreativitas

Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Rahman, dkk. (2006). Peran Strategis Kepala Sekolah

dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan.

Sumedang: Alqaprint Jatinangor

Rozencwajg, Paulette & Corroyer, Denis. (2005).

Cognitive Processes in the Refl ective-Impulsive

Cognitive Style. The Journal of Genetic

Psychology, 2005, 166(4), 451 – 463.

Tirtarahardja U, & Sulo L. (2005). Pengantar

Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta

Warli. (2010). Kreativitas Pemecahan Masalah Siswa

SMP. Jember. Kadikma. Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. Vol. 2, No. 1, April

ISSN 2085-0662. Hal 110 – 127.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.