Peningkatan Kuantitas dan Kualitas Pertanyaan Siswa melalui Penerapan Model PBL disertai Dialog Socrates di Kelas X Mia 4 SMA Negeri Gondangrejo

Jumiati Jumiati, Muzzazinah Muzzazinah, Suciati Suciati

Abstract

The objective of research was to improve the question’s quantity and quality student’s through the application of PBL using dialogue Socratic model at grade X MIA 4 of State Senior High School Gondangrejo. The result of the pre-cycleobservation shows that the quality of the question are 6 question. The quality of the question is in the C2 thinking level while according to the knowledge dimension is un the conceptual knowledge dimension. Mostly, the students thinking skill were low. So that, it needed to be improved. This study was a Classroom Action Research (CAR) conducted in two cycle. Subject were 36 students of X MIA 4 State Senior High School Gondangrejo. The steps of the research were planning, acting, and reflecting in each cycle. Data collected through observation, interview, and documentation. The data validation used triangulation method, and then were analized using qualitative-descriptive analysis technique. The improvement of the quantity and the quality of students question indicated by 6 question of pre-cycle activities with conceptual C2 as the best question quality, became 54 questions with procedural C3 as the highest questions quality within first cycle and 70 questions with metacognition C2 as the highest questions quality within the final cycle. The conclusion of research was the application of PBL using dialogue Socratic model improve the quantity and quality of question student at grade X MIA 4 State High School Gondangrejo.

Keywords

a quantity and quality of question, dialogue Socratic, PBL

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afcariono, M. (2008). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi, 3(maret), 65–68.

Al Qhomairi, A., Sutiarso, S., & Yunarti, T. (2013). Metode Socrates Kontekstual Ditinjau Dari Proses Belajar Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis. UPI Bandung.

Aryulina, D. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Pada Mata Kuliah Pendidikan Biologi Untuk Mengembangkan Kompetensi Pembelajaran Inkuiri, 1, 47–57.

Astuti, S. (2015). Peningkatan Keterampilan Bertanya Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas 2 SDN Slungkep 03 Menggunakan Model Discovery Learning. Pendidikan, 5(1), 10–23.

Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Studies in Science Education Students ’ questions : a potential resource for teaching and learning science, 44(March), 1–39. http://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101

Cnaan, R. A., Smith, K. A., Holmes, K., & Haski-leventhal, D. (2010). Motivations and Benefits of Student Volunteering : Comparing Regular , Occasional , and Non- Volunteers in Five Countries Motivations and Benefits of Student Volunteering : Comparing Regular , 1, 65–81.

Dewi, E. R., & Ariyanto, J. (2012). Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Active Knowledge Sharing Untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan Bertanya Biologi Siswa kelas XI IPA 1 SMA Negeri 1 Ngemplak Tahun Pelajaran 2011 / 2012, 3(September 2011), 79–90.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Resesarch Planner (ISBN 978-9). Singapore: Springer.

Khairuntika. (2016). Metode Socrates Dalam Mengembangkan. Prosiding Pasca Sarjana Universitas Lampung, (KNPMP I), 89–98.

Koellner-clark, K., Stallings, L. L., Hoover, S. A., Forest, A., High, P., Park, F., … Nelson, L. (2000). Socratic Seminars for Mathematics, 682–687.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). A Revision of Bloom ’ s Taxonomy :, (November 2012), 37–41.

Lam, F. (2011). The Socratic Method as an Approach to Learning and Its Benefits Honors Thesis The Socratic Method as..

Munns, C.A. (2001, October). The Socratic Dialogue: Step-By-Step. The Teaching Professor, (15)8, p. 3.

Paul, R. and Elder, L. (2006). The Art of Socratic Questioning. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Redhana, I. W. (2014). Pengaruh model pembelajaran seminar socrates terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXIII(1), 27-38

Rusman. (2012). Model-model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sideeg, A. (2016). Bloom ’ s Taxonomy , Backward Design , and Vygotsky ’ s Zone of Proximal Development in Crafting Learning Outcomes, 8(2),158–186. http://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9252

Tan, O. (2010). Problem-Based Learning : The Future Frontiers. Education, 17–30.

Tan, O.-S. (2003). Problem Based Learnin Innovation: Using Problems to Power Learning. Singapore: Cengage Learning.

Widodo, A. (2006). Profil Pertanyaan Guru dan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sains Profil Pertanyaan Guru dan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 139–148.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.