Penerapan Instruksi Pada Tahap Conceptualization Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menemukan dan Menghubungkan Konsep
Abstract
instruction in the conceptualization stage of guided inquiry learning. This research is a classroom action
research through 2 cycles. The research subject is 32 senior high school students consist of 24 female students
and 8 male students. The research procedure through stages are planning, action and observation and reflection.
Data were collected trough observation, interviews, documentation and tests for measure score of concept map.
Validity of the data with triangulation method. Data analysis using data reduction, data presentation and
drawing conclusions based on qualitative descriptive analysis. The results showed the ability to find and
connect the concept based on the concept map score on pre cycle range from 2.32%-10.6%, an average concept
map score of 4.63% with 15 of students above average score. The cycle 1 identified from score of concept map
is range 5.55%-35.6%, an average concept map score of 11.14% with 7 of students above average score. The
cycle 2 identified from score of concept map is range 7.5%-61.62%, an average concept map score of 19.4%
with 10 of students above average score, thus the ability to find and connect concepts based on the range and
mean score of the concept map students increased from pre cycle up to cycle 2.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adlaon, R. B. (2012). Assessing Effectiveness of
Concept Map As Instructional Tool in High
School.
Belenky, D., & Nokes-malach, T. (2012). Motivation
and Transfer: The Role of Mastery-Approach
Goals in Preparation for Future Learning
Motivation and Transfer: The Role of MasteryApproach
Goals in Preparation for Future
Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21,
–432.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.651232
Bilgin, I. (2009). The effects of guided inquiry
instruction incorporating a cooperative learning
approach on universit y students’ achievement of
acid and bases concepts and attitude toward
guided inquiry instruction. Scientific Research
and Essay, 4(10), 1038–1046. Retrieved from
http://www.academicjournals.org/sre
Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W.,
Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E.
M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of
accountability?: A Quantitative comparison of
the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and
verification laboratory instruction. Science
Education, 94(4), 577–616.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20390
Darmawati. (2016). Penerapan Pendekatan Contextual
Teaching And Learning Dalam Meningkatkan
Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Penjumlahan
Dan Pengurangan Bentuk Aljabar Kelas Vii Smp
Negeri 1 Banawa. Jurnal Pendidikan
Matematika, 5(1), 94–105.
Gijlers, H. (2005). Sharing and Confronting
Propositions in Collaborative Scientific
Discovery Learning.
Hattie, J., & Gan, M. (2011).Instruction based on
feedback. Handbook of research on learning and
instruction.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839089.ch13
Holmes, N. G. (2014). Making the failure more
productive: scaffolding the invention process to
improve inquiry behaviors and outcomes in
invention activities.Instructional Science, 42(4),
–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-0139300-7
Jibrin, A. G. (2012). Effect Of Concept Mapping
Teaching Strategy On The Academic
Achievement Of Senior Secondary School
Students In Genetics. Journal of Science,
Technology & Education, 1(1), 49–53.
Johnson, C. C., Zhang, D., & Kahle, J. B. (2012).
Effective Science Instruction: Impact on HighStakes
Assessment Performance. Research in
Middle Level Education Online, 35(9), 1–12.
Retrieved from http://0search.ebscohost.com.oasis.lib.tamuk.edu/login.
aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=80237658&sit
e=ehost-live
Kadir, A. (2013). Konsep Pembelajaran Kontekstual
di Sekolah. Dinamika Ilmu, 13(1), 17–38.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006).
Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does
Not Work. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 87–
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102
Liu, S.-H., & Lee, G.-G. (2013). Using a concept map
knowledge management system to enhance the learning of biology. Computers & Education,
(5), 105–116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.007
Maikristina, N., Dasna, I. W., & Sulistina, O.
(2013).Pengaruh Penggunaan Model
Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap Hasil
Belajar dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa
Kelas XI IPA SMAN 3 Malang pada Materi
Hidrolisis Garam.Jurnal Kimia FMIPA UNM, 1,
–8.
Marjan, J., Arnyana, I. B. P., & Setiawan, I. G. a N.
(2014).Pengaruh Pembelajaran Pendekatan
Saintifik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi dan
Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa MA
Mu’allimat NW Pancor Selong Kabupaten
Lombok Timur Nusa Tenggara Barat.Jurnal
Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 1–12. Retrieved from
http://pasca.undiksha.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/view/1316/
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2009).
Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and
does it matter? Results from a research synthesis
years 1984 to 2002.Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W., & Jong, T. de.
(2010). Finding out how they find it out: an
empirical analysis of inquiry learners’ need for
support. International Journal of Production
Research, 1(9), 1–36.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.693189
Noonan, P. (2011). Using Concept Maps in
Perioperative Education.AORN, 94(5), 469–478.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2011.02.013
Novak & Gowin. (1985). Learning how to learn.
Cambridge. Cambridge University Press
Opara, J. A., & Oguzor, N. silas.(2011). Inquiry
Instructional Method and the School Science
Currículum.Current Research Journal of Social
Sciences, 3(3), 188–198.
Panasan, M., Nuangchalerm, P., & Muang, A.
(2010).Learning Outcomes of Project-Based and
Inquiry-Based Learning Activities.Journal of
Social Sciences, 6(2), 252–255.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., Jong, T. De,
Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases
of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the
inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review,
(1), 47–61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif
Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suniati, N. M. S. (2013). Pengaruh Implementasi
Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbantuan
Multimedia Interaktif Terhadap Penurunan
Miskonsepsi.E-Journal Program Pascasarjana
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 4(1), 1–13.
Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher’s role in promoting
collaborative dialogue in the classroom.The
British Journal of Educational Psychology,
(1), 1–28.
https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X380772
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
