Penerapan Argument Driven Inquiry Berbasis SSI Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Pada Materi Perubahan Lingkungan

Isnaeni Sulton Fathonah, Joko Ariyanto, Umi Fatmawati

Abstract

The independent curriculum emphasizes 21st-century skills, including the 4Cs (critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity). An important aspect of achieving the skills in the independent curriculum is the ability to present arguments. This study aims to (1) determine the implementation of the Argument-Driven Inquiry model based on SSI and (2) assess the improvement in scientific argumentation skills of Grade 10 students at State High School 7 Surakarta through the application of the Argument-Driven Inquiry model based on SSI. This study is a two-cycle Classroom Action Research. The population used was students in Class X-C of SMA Negeri 7 Surakarta in the 2024/2025 academic year. The research data consisted of written scientific argumentation skills measured based on test results. Data collection techniques included tests, observations, interviews, and documentation. Data validity was tested using the triangulation method. Data analysis techniques used qualitative descriptive methods. The achievement indicator was an overall increase in scientific argumentation skills to 75%. The research procedure included planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The results showed that the implementation of Argument Driven Inquiry based on SSI could improve students' scientific argumentation skills. The average scientific argumentation skills of students in the pre-intervention phase were 49%, in Cycle I 64,3%, and in Cycle II 75.9%. It is hoped that this research can be used as a reference for the application of Argument Driven Inquiry based on SSI for similar research and as a consideration for teachers to achieve optimal learning.

Keywords

Argument Driven Inquiry; Environmental Change; Scientific Argumentation Skills; SSI

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amin, A. M., Adiansyah, R., & Hujjatusnaini, N. (2021). Hubungan antara motivasi belajar dengan keterampilan argumentasi pada mahasiswa biologi 9(2), 140-157. Jurnal Biotek, 9(2), 140–157.

Amin, A. M., Adiansyah, R., Hujjatusnaini, N., & History, A. (2021). Hubungan antara motivasi belajar dengan keterampilan argumentasi pada mahasiswa biologi. Jurnal Biotek, 9(2), 140–157.

Apriyanti, N. D., & Alberida, H. (2023). Pengaruh model prolem based learning (PBL) terhadap keterampilan argumentasi peserta didik pada pembelajaran biologi: literature review. BIOCHEPHY:JournalofScienceEducation, 3(1), 40–48.

Arfiany, N., Ramlawati, R., & Yunus, S. R. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Terhadap Peningkatan Keterampilan Argumentasi Dan Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia (JPPSI), 4(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsi.v4i1.31575

Budinarianti, E., & Susiyawati, E. (2024). Pembelajaran Ipa Berbasis Socioscientific Issue Global Warming Untuk Meningkatkan Argumentasi Siswa SMP. BIOCHEPHY: Journal of Science Education, 4(2), 585–591. https://doi.org/10.52562/biochephy.v4i2.1211

Deane, P., & Song, Y. (2014). A case study in principled assessment design: Designing assessments to measure and support the development of argumentative reading and writing skills. Psicología Educativa, 20(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.10.001

Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry in Laboratory Instruction. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(1), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2324

Firdaus, L., Ibrohim, Lestari, S. R., Primawari, S. N., & Masiah. (2023). Investigating Socio-scientific Reasoning of Biology Prospective Teacher: Focus on Genetic Modified Organism (GMO) (pp. 158–166). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-020-6_17

Foutz, T. L. (2019). Using argumentation as a learning strategy to improve student performance in engineering Statics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(3), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1488818

Hanunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M. H., & Sutomo, H. (2015). Argument-Driven Inquiry with Scaffolding as the Development Strategies of Argumentation and Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Lampung, Indonesia. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(9), 1185–1192.

Hardini, S. D., & Alberida, H. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Peserta Didik. Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 17(1), 93–99. https://dx.doi.org/10.30870/biodidaktika.v17i1.16108

Lestari, Raihana. V. A., & Hindun, H. (2023). Penerapan 4C (Communication, Collaboration, Critical Thinking, Creativity) pada kurikulum merdeka di tingkat SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 3(2), 15–26.

McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Synergy between teacher practices and curricular scaffolds to support students in using domain-specific and domain-general knowledge in writing arguments to explain phenomena. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(3), 416–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903013488

McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Supporting grade 5–8 students in constructing Explanations in science: The claim, evidence and reasoning framework for talk and writing. Pearson Allyn & Bacon.

McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1

Nasution, E. S. (2019). Peningkatan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Ilmiah Pada Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Argument- Driven Inquiry (ADI). Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 3(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol3-iss2/375

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035

Pawl, A. (2022). Claims, evidence and reasoning in the introductory mechanics Lab. 2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2022.pr.Pawl

Pelegia Dianti, Ari Sunandar, & Anandita Eka Setiadi. (2023). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep Dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Dengan Model Argument Driven Inquiry Berbasis Socio-Scientific Issue. Qalam: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 12(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33506/jq.v12i2.2706

Pitorini, D. E., Suciati, S., & Ariyanto, J. (2020). Kemampuan argumentasi siswa: Perbandingan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dan inkuiri terbimbing dipadu dialog Socrates. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.27761

Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009). Argument-Driven Inquiry To Promote the Understanding of Important Concepts & Practices in Biology. The American Biology Teacher, 71(8), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1662/005.071.0805

Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421

Setiawan, A., & Jumadi, J. (2023). Analysis of the Implementation of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) in Students’ Argumentation Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.2725

Sulistianingsih, M., & Yanto, F. (2024). Studi Literatur: Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(2), 18944–18954.

Utami, L., Festiyed, F., Yerimadesi, Y., & Arsih, F. (2024). Argument Driven Inquiry in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Conference on Education and Innovation (ICEI)), 1(1), 52–62.

Zahroh, nisatuz, Nurul Hidayati, S., & Vika Aulia, E. (2024). Penerapan Socio Scientific Issues (SSI) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Peserta Didik Kelas VII di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Nusantara:Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(4), 1030–1039. https://doi.org/10.14421/njpi.2024.v4i4-10

Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.