Evaluasi Kinerja Lulusan Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Mesin Universitas Sebelas Maret Di Dunia Kerja

Agus Hardika, Yuyun Estriyanto, Indah Widiastuti

Abstract

Evaluation of the performance of study program graduates in the world of work is one indicator of higher education quality. The high performance of graduates and their relevance to the needs of the world of work indicate a good quality higher education. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of graduates of Sebelas Maret University Mechanical Engineering Education (PTM UNS) in the world of work. So that the results obtained as a priority reference for learning development in study programs and students. This research is quantitative descriptive. It is carried out through a tracer study of graduate data and a survey of graduate users. The subjects of this research include UNS PTM graduates who graduated in 2016, 2017 and 2018 as a source of tracking data for graduates and 80 graduate users as a source of satisfaction survey data and the level of importance of the formulated Graduate Learning Outcomes (CPL). Data collection techniques were carried out through the method of filling out the questionnaire instrument questionnaire. The analysis was carried out using quantitative descriptive statistical analysis techniques using the SPSS V.21 data processing application. The results of this study show profile data for PTM UNS graduates, namely the average graduate with a very satisfactory predicate (GPA 3.46) with an average study period of 4 years and 2 months. Most (56%) work as educators, with a high level of suitability of work with the field of science 47.5%; 38.9% moderate and the remaining 13.6% low. The average waiting time for the first job after graduation is less than 6 months (76.5%). Furthermore, for the results of the graduate user satisfaction survey, the average total satisfaction is 4.28 (very satisfactory). With an importance level of 12 Graduate Learning Outcomes (CPL), 11 of them are in the very important category and one is in the important category (T8). Objectively, users are satisfied with the performance of graduates, but subjectively researchers need to propose development priorities for study programs based on the value of the level of satisfaction which is below the total average value. The conclusion in this study shows that the performance of graduates of the PTM UNS study program has been good or satisfactory. However, there is a need for a program to improve the quality of graduate performance in the communication and professional aspects. It is hoped that the study program will be able to improve the quality of these two aspects through improving the quality of learning, infrastructure and learning facilities as well as improving the quality of educators/lecturers.

Keywords

Evaluation, Tracking Study, Graduate Performance, CPL

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ananda, R. dan Rafida, T. (2013). Introduction to Evaluation of Educational Programs. In Perdana Publishing (Vol. 53, Issue 9).

Arikunto, S. dan C. S. A. J. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan, Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

BANPT. (2018). Akreditasi Program Studi Pendidikan Jarak Jauh (PSPJJ)Program Sarjana (s1).

BANPT. (2020). Data Akreditasi Terkini Perguruan Tinggi di Indonesia. https://www.banpt.or.id/?page_id=1903

Barro, R. J. (2013). Health and Economic Growth. Journal Handbook of Economic Growth, 2, 623–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53540-5.00003-3

Dwi Sulisworo. (2016). The Contribution of the Education System Quality to Improve the Nation’s Competitiveness of Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 10(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v10i2.3468

Estriyanto, Y. (2020). Kurikulum 2021 S1 Pendidikan Teknik Mesin (Issue November 2020). Surakarta: FKIP UNS. https://lppmp.uns.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Kurikulum-S1-Pendidikan-Teknik-Mesin-2021.pdf

Fajaryati, N., Sukardiyono, T., Dwi, A., Utami, W., Pambudi, S., & Destiana, B. (2015). Studi Penelusuran ( Tracer Study ) Terhadap Alumni Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Informatika Jurusan. Jurnal Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education (ELINVO), 1(November), 231–248.

Farida, K. (2017). Penerapan Evaluasi Model CIPP (Conteks, Input,Proces,Product) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Program Pembelajaran Fiqih Materi Zakat dan Hikmahnya di Kelas X Madrasah Aliyah Paradigma Palembang. In Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang.

Ferdinand, A. (2014). Metode Penelitian Manajemen : Pedoman Penelitian untuk skripsi, Tesis dan Disertai Ilmu Manajemen. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Ira Setyaningsih dan Muchammad Abrori. (2013). Analisis Kualitas Lulusan Berdasarkan Tingkat Kepuasan Pengguna Lulusan. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri (JITI), 12(01), 73–82.

ITB Carier Center. (2021). Tracer Study ITB. https://tracer.itb.ac.id/id/tentang/tentang-tracer-study

K. Bahari dan Adan Widodo Aswin. (2015). Tracer Study dan Evaluasi Kompetensi Lulusan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kesehatan Halaman 53.

Menristekdikti. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Nomor 44 Tahun 2015 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. In Current Science (Vol. 97, Issue 9).

News Update. (2021, March 2). Cara Hitung Rumus Slovin dalam Statistik. https://kumparan.com/berita-update/cara-hitung-rumus-slovin-dalam-statistik-1vHFTCZHZl1

Purwanto, N. (2004). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pusat Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Online. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka

Q S Quacquarelli Symonds. (2021). QS World University Rangking 2021. World University Rangking, 15–41.

Samuels, P. (2016). Advice on Reliability Analysis with Small Samples Statistical Methods – Scale reliability analysis with small samples Research question type : Most. Journal ResaerchGate Technical Report, August 2015, 2–6. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1495.5364

Slamet Riyanto dan Aglis Andhita Hatmawan. (2020). Metode Riset Penelitian Kuantitatif Penelitian Di Bidang Manajemen, Teknik, Pendidikan dan Eksperimen. CV BUDI UTAMA. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=W2vXDwAAQBAJ&printsec=copyright&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false

Slameto. (2001). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Soegiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Soesatyo, B. (2018). Peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam Pembangunan Indonesia. Kumparan.Com. https://kumparan.com/bambang-soesatyo/peran-perguruan-tinggi-dalam-pembangunan-indonesia/1

Sofyan, A. (2006). Evaluasi Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: UIN Jakarta Press.

Stufflebeam dan Shinkfield. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Aplications. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass A Wiley Brand.

Sudjana, Nana. (2006). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tayibnapis, F. Y. (1989). Evaluasi Program. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan. http://kin.perpusnas.go.id/DisplayData.aspx?pId=114813&pRegionCode=UN11MAR&pClientId=112

World Bank Group. (2017). Higher Education for Development. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. https://doi.org/10.1596/26486

Yusoff, Y. M., Omar, M. Z., & Zaharim, A. (2013). Evaluation of Graduates’ Performance Using Fuzzy Approach. Journal Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102(Ifee 2012), 64–73.

Peraturan Menteri PAN-RB Nomor 38 Tahun 2017 Tentang Standar Kompetesi Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN)

Peraturan Menteri Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Nomor 44 tahun 2015 tentang standar nasional pendidikan tinggi

Peraturan Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 tentang Instrumen Akreditasi Program Studi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Nomor 2012 Tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. (n.d.).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan. (n.d.).

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.