Comparison of reproductive performance of Gembrong goats and male Boerka goats

Husnurrizal Husnurrizal, Daffa Gustia Putra Akbar, Tongku Nizwan Siregar, Hafizuddin Hafizuddin, Sri Wahyuni, Anwar Anwar, Arie Febretrisiana

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the reproductive performance of Boerka goats and Gembrong goats.

Methods: The research was conducted at the Sei Putih Slaughter Goat Research Workshop in Deli Serdang, North Sumatra. In this study, male Boerka (n=3) and Gembrong (n=3) goats, aged 3 years and having the same average Body Condition Score (BCS) of 3.83±0.29, were used. Reproductive performance observed included scrotal circumference, libido score, and semen quality macroscopically (volume, color, odor, and consistency) and microscopically (concentration, motility, viability, and abnormalities). The data collected was tabulated and analyzed by t test.

Results: Of all the parameters of reproductive performance examined, it is known that only the parameters of semen volume (ml) and sperm concentration (x106 cells/ml) showed a significant difference (P<0.05) between Gembrong goats vs. Boerka goats with values of 0.50±0.0 vs. 1.0±0.20 and 1.557±712 vs. 4.500±317.65, respectively, while the other parameters did not show a significant difference (P>0.05).

Conclusions: It was concluded that the volume and concentration of Boerka goats were higher than Gembrong goats.

Keywords

Boerka buck; Gembrong buck; Libido; Scrotal circumference; Semen

Full Text:

PDF

References

  1. Pamungkas, F. A. dan A. Batubara. 2012. Kambing Gembrong: Sumber daya genetik kambing di Indonesia dengan status endangereed (terancam punah). Prosiding Seminar dan Kongres Nasional Sumber Daya Genetik. 94.
  2. Budiarto, A., A. Susanto, G. Ciptadi, A. R. I. Putri, and M. A. Sunaryo. 2021. Quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Boer x local goats crossbred. Animal Production. 23(2):77-83. Doi: 10.20884/1. jap.2021.23.2.109
  3. Dewi, R. K. dan W. Wardoyo. 2018. Evaluasi genetik pejantan Boer sebagai pemacek kambing lokal berdasarkan performans hasil persilangannya. Seminar Nasional Unisla 2018. 1(1):49-53.
  4. Nuraini, N., Z. Hidayat, dan A. Asmarhansyah. 2017. Karakteristik sifat kualitatif dan kuantitatif kambing Boerka yang dipelihara di Kp. Petaling Kepulauan Bangka Belitung. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Agroinovasi Spesifik Lokasi Untuk Ketahanan Pangan Pada Era Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN. 1249-1253.
  5. Isnaini, N., S. Wahjuningsih, and E. Adhitama. 2019. Seasonal effects on semen quality of Ongole crossbred and Simmental bulls used for artificial insemination. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 31(2):16.
  6. BSNI. 2014. SNI 4869.3. Semen beku - bagian 3: Kambing dan domba. Badan Standardisasi Nasional Indonesia, Jakarta. p. 1-9.
  7. Syamyono, O., D. Samsudewa, dan E. T. Setiatin. 2014. Korelasi lingkar skrotum dengan bobot badan, volume semen, kualitas semen, dan kadar testosteron pada kambing kejobong muda dan dewasa. Buletin Peternakan. 38(3):132-140. Doi: 10.21059/buletinpeternak.v38i3.5248
  8. Syarifuddin, N. A., M. Rizal, dan M. Riyadhi. 2020. Meningkatkan libido dan kualitas semen pejantan kambing Peranakan Etawah (PE) yang diberi pakan tambahan Urea Moringa Molasses Multinutrient Block (UMMMB). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lingkungan Lahan Basah. 5(2):80-87.
  9. Zamuna, K. K., T. Susilawati, G. Ciptadi, dan M. Marjuki. 2015. Perbedaan kualitas semen dan produksi semen beku pada berbagai bangsa sapi potong. Ternak Tropika Journal of Tropical Animal Production. 16(2):1-6. Doi: 10.21776/ub. jtapro.2015.016.02.1
  10. Isnaini, N., S. Wahjuningsih, A. Ma’ruf, and D. Witayanto. 2019. Effects of age and breed on semen quality of beef bull sires in an Indonesian artificial insemination center. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 31(5).
  11. Musaffak, T. R., S. Sumartono, dan N. Humaidah. 2021. Perbedaan kualitas semen segar, cair dan beku kambing Peranakan Etawah dan kambing Saanen. Int. J. Anim. Sci. 4(03):75-84. Doi: 10.30736/asj.v4i03.71.
  12. Solihati, N., S. D. Rasad, R. Setiawan, and S. Nurjanah. 2018. Pengaruh kadar gliserol terhadap kualitas semen domba lokal. Jurnal Biodjati. 3(1):63-71. Doi: 10.15575/ biodjati.v3i1.2357.
  13. WHO. 2010. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. WHO Press, Switzerland.
  14. Hafizuddin, H., N. W. K. Karja, L. Praharani, and M. A. Setiadi. 2021. Breed and age effects on concentration of adiponectin and reproductive performance in Anglo Nubian, Etawah grade and its crossbred bucks. Biodiversitas. 22(3). Doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d220305
  15. Saputra, A. K., M. D. I. Hamdani, S. Suharyati, dan M. Hartono. 2019. Korelasi antara bobot badan, lingkar skrotum, dan volume semen kambing saburai di wilayah sumber bibit Kabupaten Tanggamus. Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Peternakan. 3(1):7-11.
  16. Hendri, M., G. Riady, and R. Daud. 2017. The relationships of scrotal circumference and sperm concentration in male Ettawa cross breed. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Veteriner. 2(1):41-50. Doi: 10.21157/jim% 20vet..v2i1
  17. Aissanou, S. and A. Ayad. 2020. Influence of age, body weight and season on testicular and epididymis biometrics in donkeys (Equus asinus). International Journal of Morphology. 38(5):1434-1443. Doi: 10.4067/S0717-95022020000501434
  18. Kondracki, S., M. Iwanina, A. Wysokińska, and K. Górski. 2013. The use of sexual activity measurements to assess ejaculatory performance of boars. Arch. Anim. Breed. 56(1):1052-1059. Doi: 10.7482/0003-9438-56-106
  19. Rizal, M., C. Nisa, dan R. Norliani. 2021. Kualitas semen beku kambing Peranakan Boer yang dikriopreservasi dengan pengencer Tris kuning telur dan berbagai konsentrasi ekstrak daun kelor. J. Vet. 22(3):309-316. Doi: 10.19087/jveteriner. 2021.22.3.309
  20. Susilawati, T. 2011. Spermatology. UB press, Malang. p. 96-109.
  21. Riyadhi, M., N. A. Syarifuddin, W. Kurniawan, dan R. I. Juniarti. 2021. Korelasi lingkar skrotum terhadap kualitas semen kambing Peranakan Etawah (PE). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lingkungan Lahan Basah. 6(3):1-6.
  22. Riyadhi, M. S., Agus , H. Herdis, and M. Rizal. 2017. Epididymal spermatozoa quality of Etawa crossbreed goat in tris extender supplemented with various lactose concentrations. Jurnak Kedokteran Hewan. 11(1):15-18. Doi: 10.21157/j.ked. hewan.v11i1.5136
  23. Garner, D. and E. Hafez. 2000. Spermatozoa and seminal plasma in reproduction in farm animals. Blackwell Publishing. p. 95-109.
  24. Rahmawati, M. A., T. Susilawati, dan M. N. Ihsan. 2015. Kualitas semen dan produksi semen beku pada bangsa sapi dan bulan penampungan yang berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan. 25(3):25-36. Doi: 10.21776/ub.jiip.2015.025.03.04.
  25. Aerens, C. D., M. N. Ihsan, dan N. Isnaini. 2012. Perbedaan kuantitatif dan kualitatif semen segar pada berbagai bangsa sapi potong. Malang.
  26. Lestari, T. P., M. N. Ihsan, dan N. Isnaini. 2014. Pengaruh waktu simpan semen segar dengan pengencer andromed pada suhu ruang terhadap kualitas semen kambing Boer. Jurnal Ternak Tropika. 15(1):43-50.
  27. Cahyadi, T. R. T., M. S. Christiyanto, dan E. T. 2016. Persentase hidup dan abnormalitas sel spermatozoa kambing Peranakan Ettawah (PE) dengan pakan yang disuplementasi daun binahong (Anredera Cordifolia (Ten.) Steenis). Animal Agriculture Journal. 5(3):23-32.
  28. Putranti, O. D. and K. S. Bandiati. 2020. Effect of quality difference concentration of tris yolk on duck eggs spermatozoa Padjadjaran sheep. 5th International Conference on Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources (FANRes 2019). 194:397-399.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/lar.v21i1.63859

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.