Risdiyanto Risdiyanto, Adelia Berliani Harnanto Putri, Nindyo Cahyo Kresnanto


Traffic congestion is a serious problem in many cities in the world. Congestion will be reduced if most private vehicle users want to switch to using Urban Public Transport (AUP) when traveling. In order for AUP to be in demand, AUP services must be better. One of the most important services in attracting AUP passengers is the short travel time. The intended travel time is a combination of time to the stop, waiting time at the stop, time in the vehicle, transfer time, and travel time from the stop to the final destination. In order for travel time to be calculated, the weight of each component of travel time must be known. The purpose of this study was to determine the weight of each type of travel time component by taking the case of the Trans Jogja Bus (BTJ). The analysis was carried out using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Data were obtained by conducting interviews / distributing questionnaires both in person and online, to 103 young respondents in urban Yogyakarta. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the components of travel time with weights from the largest in succession were waiting time at the bus stop, followed by time to the bus stop, transfer time, time from the bus stop to the final destination, and time in the vehicle. These results indicate that reducing waiting time at bus stops is a priority program that needs to be done to shorten the total travel time so that AUP becomes attractive.


travel time weight, public transportation

Full Text:



Azmi, Salsabila Annisa. 2018. “Jogja Makin Macet, Penumpang Trans Jogja Merosot.” Harian

Boujelbene, Younes, and Ahmed Derbel. 2015. “The Performance Analysis of Public Transport Operators in Tunisia Using AHP Method.” Procedia Computer Science 73(Awict): 498–508.

Carrel, Andre, and Joan L. Walker. 2017. “Understanding Future Mode Choice Intentions of Transit Riders as a Function of Past Experiences with Travel Quality.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 17(3): 360–83.

Choi, Jong-San. 2015. “Improvements of Efficiency of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Project Priority in International Rural Development.” Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture 27(1): 7–14.

Güner, Samet. 2018. “Measuring the Quality of Public Transportation Systems and Ranking the Bus Transit Routes Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques.” Case Studies on Transport Policy 6(2): 214–24.

Hildebrand, Cisilia, and Stina Hörtin. 2014. “A Comparative Study between Emme and Visum with Respect to Public Transport Assignment.” : 125.

Inro. 2021. “Emme Multimodal Transport Planning Software.”

Ismiyanto, Agung. 2019. “Penumpang Trans Jogja Berkurang Hingga 10 Persen Dari Tahun 2016.”

Kementerian Perhubungan. 2019. Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia No. 12 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perlindungan Keselamatan Pengguna Sepeda Motor Yang Digunakan Untuk Kepentingan Masyarakat. 2020. “Subsidi Besar, Layanan Trans Jogja Harus Baik.”

Liu, Ying-xin, and Min Yang. 2018. “Analysis of Passenger Satisfaction for Bus Line Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process.” DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science (amse): 140–44.

Majeed, S, and Z Batool. 2016. “Evaluation of Factors That Encourage Public Transit Usage : A Case Study of Lahore.” 68(2): 184–94.

Masoumi, Houshmand E. 2019. “A Discrete Choice Analysis of Transport Mode Choice Causality and Perceived Barriers of Sustainable Mobility in The MENA Region.” Transport Policy 79: 37–53.

Mayo, Francis L., and Evelyn B. Taboada. 2020. “Ranking Factors Affecting Public Transport Mode Choice of Commuters in an Urban City of a Developing Country Using Analytic Hierarchy Process: The Case of Metro Cebu, Philippines.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 4.

McKnight, A. 1982. “The Value of Travel Savings in Public Sector Evaluation.” BTE Publication Summary. (August 2, 2021).

Moslem, Sarbast, and Szabolcs Duleba. 2018. “ICTTE 2018 International Conference on Traffic and Transport Engineering.” (September 2019).

Müller, P., Schleicher-Jester, F., Schmidt, M.-P. & Topp, H.H. 1992. “Konzepte Flächenhafter Verkehrsberuhigung in 16 Städten”.” Grüne Reihe des Fachgebiets Verkehrswesen der Universität Kaiserslautern No. 24.

Paulley, Neil et al. 2006. “The Demand for Public Transport: The Effects of Fares, Quality of Service, Income and Car Ownership.” Transport Policy 13(4): 295–306.

Pedroso, Guilherme, Célio Bermann, and Alessandro Sanches-Pereira. 2018. “Combining the Functional Unit Concept and the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method for Performance Assessment of Public Transport Options.” Case Studies on Transport Policy 6(4): 722–36.

Prabowo, Andreas Agung. 2019. “Kinerja Pelayanan Dan Operasional Angkutan Perkotaan Trans Jogja.” Universitas Janabadra. Redman, Lauren, Margareta Friman, Tommy Gärling, and Terry Hartig. 2013. “Quality Attributes of Public Transport That Attract Car Users: A Research Review.” Transport Policy 25: 119–27.

Saaty, R. W. 1987. “The Analytic Hierarchy Process-What It Is and How It Is Used.” Mathematical Modelling 9(3–5): 161–76.

Sanjaya, Afri Hari. 2018. “Kinerja Pelayanan Angkutan Umum Perkotaan Berdasarkan Kepuasan Dan Kesetiaan Konsumen.” Universitas Janabadra Yogyakarta.

Susanto, Slamet. 2008. “Yogyakarta Hails New Trans Jogja Busway.” The Jakarta Post.

Tamin, O.Z. 2000. Perencanaan & Pemodelan Transportasi. Kedua. Bandung: Penerbit ITB.

Thorpe, Neil, Peter Hills, and Sittha Jaensirisak. 2000. “Public Attitudes to TDM Measures: A Comparative Study.” Transport Policy 7(4): 243–57.

Wildan, Indah. 2020. “Sudah Efektifkah Trans Jogja.” Biro Pernerbit Teknik Sipil UGM.


  • There are currently no refbacks.