Advancing string theory with 4G model of final unification

U.V. Satya Seshavatharam, S. Lakshminarayana, T. Gunavardhana Naidu

Abstract

In the framework of the recently proposed 4G model of final unification, integrating three large atomic gravitational constants corresponding to the electromagnetic, strong, and electroweak interactions, we explore the physical existence of a fundamental electroweak fermion of rest energy ≈ 585 GeV. This particle is envisioned as the “zygote” of all elementary fermions and as the weak‐field counterpart to photons and gluons. Using three core assumptions and five defining relations, the model quantitatively reproduces key nuclear and particle physics observables, including the strong coupling constant, nuclear binding energies, neutron lifetime, charge radii, and several dimensionless large numbers. Theoretical string tensions and energies are derived for each atomic interaction (weak, strong, electromagnetic) using experimentally relevant scales (GeV–MeV–eV) rather than the inaccessible Planck scale, thus extending string theory’s applicability to testable low‑energy domains. Comparative analysis (Tables 1 and 2) demonstrates close agreement between calculated string energies and known interaction energies, providing a bridge between quantum gravity concepts and measurable nuclear data. The model also predicts possible astrophysical signatures of the 585 GeV fermion through annihilation and acceleration processes capable of generating TeV–multi‑TeV photons. While the approach is qualitative in some mathematical details, its ability to fit fundamental constants and nuclear properties within a unified string–gravitational paradigm offers a promising, experimentally approachable route toward a physically grounded final unification theory.

Keywords

4G model of final unification; electroweak fermion; strong coupling constant; large atomic gravitational constants; nuclear binding energy; string tensions; TeV photon emission; unified physics

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1] Sunil Mukhi. String theory: a perspective over the last 25 years. Class. Quantum Grav. 28 153001, 2011.

[2] Sachdev, Subir. Strange and stringy. Scientific American. 308 (44): 44–51,2013.

[3] Blumenhagen R., Lüst D., Theisen S. Basic Concepts of String Theory. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics Springer Heidelberg, Germany, 2013.

[4] Arnab Priya Saha and Aninda Sinha Phys. Field Theory Expansions of String Theory Amplitudes.Rev. Lett. 132, 221601,2024.

[5] Seshavatharam U.V.S. and Lakshminarayana S. On the compactification and reformation of string theory with three large atomic gravitational constants. International Journal of Physical Research, 9(1), 42-48, 2021.

[6] Clifford Cheung, Aaron Hillman, Grant N. Remmen, “String Theory May Be Inevitable as a Unified Theory of Physics,” Physics World (2025)

[7] Seshavatharam U.V.S and Lakshminarayana S. Radius, surface area and volume dependent electroweak term and isospin dependent asymmetry term of the strong and electroweak mass formula. Int. J. Phys. Appl. 2025;7(1):122-134.

[8] Seshavatharam U.V.S and Lakshminarayana S. Understanding the Origins of Quark Charges, Quantum of Magnetic Flux, Planck’s Radiation Constant and Celestial Magnetic Moments with the 4G Model of Nuclear Charge. Current Physics. 1, e090524229812, 122-147, 2024.

[9] Seshavatharam U.V.S and Lakshminarayana S. Exploring condensed matter physics with refined electroweak term of the strong and electroweak mass formula. World Scientific News.193(2) 105-13, 2024.

[10] Seshavatharam U. V. S, Gunavardhana Naidu T and Lakshminarayana S. Nuclear evidences for confirming the physical existence of 585 ‎GeV weak fermion and galactic observations of TeV radiation. International Journal of Advanced Astronomy. 13(1):1-17, 2025.

[11] Seshavatharam U. V. S., Gunavardhana Naidu T and Lakshminarayana S. 2022. To confirm the existence of heavy weak fermion of rest energy 585 GeV. AIP Conf. Proc. 2451 p 020003

[12] Seshavatharam U V S and Lakshminarayana S. 4G model of final unification – A brief report Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2197 p 012029, 2022.

[13] Seshavatharam U. V. S and Lakshminarayana S., H. K. Cherop and K. M. Khanna, Three Unified Nuclear Binding Energy Formulae. World Scientific News, 163, 30-77, 2022.

[14] Seshavatharam U.V.S and Lakshminarayana, S., On the Combined Role of Strong and Electroweak Interactions in Understanding Nuclear Binding Energy Scheme. Mapana Journal of Sciences, 20(1), 1-18, 2021.

[15] Seshavatharam U.V.S and Lakshminarayana S., Strong and Weak Interactions in Ghahramany’s Integrated Nuclear Binding Energy Formula. World Scientific News, 161, 111-129, 2021.

[16] Seshavatharam U.V.S and Lakshminarayana S. Is reduced Planck’s constant - an outcome of electroweak gravity? Mapana Journal of Sciences. 19(1), 1,-13, 2020.

[17] Seshavatharam U.V.S and Lakshminarayana S. A very brief review on strong and electroweak mass formula pertaining to 4G model of final unification. Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. 67,1173, 2023.

[18] Seshavatharam U.V.S and Lakshminarayana S. Computing unified atomic mass unit and Avogadro number with various nuclear binding energy formulae coded in Python. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2025;13(1):24-30.

[19] Seshavatharam U.V.S and Lakshminarayana S. A Unified 6-Term Formula for Nuclear Binding Energy with a Single Set of Energy Coefficients for Z = 1–140. Preprints 2025, 2025072397.

[20] Seshavatharam U.V.S, Gunavardhana, T. N. and Lakshminarayana, S. Avogadro’s Number: History, Scientific Role, State-of-the-Art, and Frontier Computational Perspectives. Preprints 2025, 2025080338.

[21] Seshavatharam U.V.S, Gunavardhana, T. N. and Lakshminarayana, S. Seesaw Model of Neutrino Mass Estimation with a Dirac Mass of 585 GeV Electroweak Fermion and the Unified Stoney Mass. Preprints 2025, 2025071680.

[22] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Phys. Rev. 47, 777, 1935.

[23] N. Bohr. Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 480, 696, 1935,

[24] J.S. Bell. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195, 1964.

[25] J. Bell, On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics. 38, 3, 447, 1966.

[26] Seshavatharam U.V.S, Lakshminarayana S. EPR argument and mystery of the reduced Planck’s constant. Algebras, Groups, and Geometries. 36(4), 801-822, 2020.

[27] C. Grojean. Higgs Physics. Proceedings of the 2015 CERN–Latin-American School of High-Energy Physics, 143-157, 2016, CERN-2016-005 (CERN, Geneva, 2016)

[28] Ahmed Abokhalil. The Higgs Mechanism and Higgs Boson: Unveiling the Symmetry of the Universe. arXiv:2306.01019v2 [hep-ph]

[29] D d’Enterria et al. The strong coupling constant: state of the art and the decade ahead. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 51 090501, 2024.

[30] S. Navas et al. Quarks. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

[31] Miao Li. Introduction to M Theory.arXiv:hep-th/9811019v2, 1998.

[32] Miemiec, A. and Schnakenburg, I. Basics of M-theory. Fortschr. Phys., 54: 5-72.2006.

[33] Tuan Q. Do, W. F. Kao. Compactification on Calabi-Yau threefolds: Consistent truncation to pure supergravity. arXiv:2412.00186v2,2024.

[34] Do, T.Q., Kao, W.F. A gap between two approaches of dimensional reduction for a six-dimensional Kaluza–Klein theory. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140, 149, 2025.

[35] S C Tiwari. Unified field theories and Einstein. arXiv:physics/0602112v2,2019.

[36] Abhay Ashtekar and Eugenio Bianchi.A short review of loop quantum gravity. Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 042001, 2021.

[37] Apoorva D. Patel. EPR Paradox, Bell Inequalities and Peculiarities of Quantum Correlations.arXiv:2502.06791v1,2025.

[38] Luis A. Anchordoqui, Ignatios Antoniadis. Hiding the extra dimensions: A review on scale separation in string theory.arXiv:2311.12105v3,2024.

[39] Bethe H. A. Thomas-Fermi Theory of Nuclei. Phys. Rev., 167(4), 879-907, 1968.

[40] Myers W. D. and Swiatecki W. J. Nuclear Properties According to the Thomas-Fermi Model.LBL-36557 Rev. UC-413, 1995.

[41] Myers W. D. and Swiatecki W. J. Table of nuclear masses according to the 1994 Thomas-Fermi model. United States: N. p., 1994. Web.

[42] P.R. Chowdhury, C. Samanta, D.N. Basu, Modified Bethe– Weizsacker mass formula with isotonic shift and new driplines. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 20, 1605–1618, 2005.

[43] G. Royer, On the coefficients of the liquid drop model mass formulae and nuclear radii. Nuclear Physics A, 807, 3–4, 105-118, 2008.

[44] Djelloul Benzaid, Salaheddine Bentridi, Abdelkader Kerraci, Naima Amrani. Bethe–Weizsa¨cker semiempirical mass formula coefficients 2019 update based on AME2016.NUCL. SCI. TECH. 31:9, 2020.

[45] Gao, Z.P., Wang, YJ., Lü, HL. et al., Machine learning the nuclear mass. NUCL. SCI. TECH. 32, 109, 2021.

[46] Peng Guo, et. al. (DRHBc Mass Table Collaboration), Nuclear mass table in deformed relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory in continuum, II: Even-Z nuclei. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 158 (2024) 101661

[47] Cht. Mavrodiev S, Deliyergiyev M.A. Modification of the nuclear landscape in the inverse problem framework using the generalized Bethe-Weizsäcker mass formula. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 27: 1850015, 2018.

[48] Seshavatharam U.V.S. and Lakshminarayana S. Simplified & Unified Picture of Nuclear Binding Energy. Prespacetime journal, 6(11), 1261-1273, 2015.

[49] Seshavatharam, U. V. S.; Lakshminarayana, S. Revised Electroweak and Asymmetry Terms of the Strong and Electroweak Mass Formula Associated with 4G Model of Final Unification. Preprints 2025050425, 2025.

[50] Seshavatharam, U. V. S. and S. Lakshminarayana. A Unified 6-Term Formula for Nuclear Binding Energy with a Single Set of Energy Coefficients for Z = 1–140. Preprints 2025072397. 2025.

[51] H. Gao M. Vanderhaeghen, The proton charge radius. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015002, 2022.

[52] Barbara Clerbaux, Carl Gwilliam, Searches for New High-Mass Resonances Decaying to Fermions at the LHC, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 74, 417–446, 2024.

[53] Jonathan DeMont, Mark Goodsell, Marco Guzzi, Experimental Particle Physics Priorities 2025: A String Phenomenology Perspective, arXiv:2505.12965, 2025

[54] CMS Collaboration Reports. CMS at LHCP 2025: Recent Advances in Heavy Fermion and BSM Searches, 2025.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jphystheor-appl.v9i2.108424

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.