COMPUTATIONAL THINKING ABILITY THROUGH ROBOTICS AND CONSTRUCTIVISM APPROACH SANALYSIS

Istikomah Istikomah, Cucuk Wawan Budiyanto

Abstract

Computational Thinking (CT) is the ability needed to help solve problems. The ability to think computationally is needed to manage activities in various disciplines. Computational thinking skills requires the right learning approach. One possible approach to improving CT is the constructivism approach. Constructivist learning provides opportunities for students to explore the ability to create, understand and solve problems through direct experiments. Constructivism learning can be facilitated using media or learning tools. One of the media or tools that can be used in building computational thinking skills is robots. Some researchers have examined the relevance of using robots in learning at various levels of education including the level of basic education. Through the results of research by several experts, the use of robotics in learning has a positive impact on improving students' computational thinking skills through activities using robotics. However, there has been no exploration of learning approaches that are compatible with the use of robotics. Therefore we need a literature study that will be discussed in this article about the relationship between computational thinking skills and constructivism approaches, a study of the relationship between computational thinking skills and the use of robotics and about how to build critical thinking skills through constructivism and robotics approaches. This article uses the literature review method with the aim of reviewing how to build computational thinking skills through constructivism approaches and the use of robotics in learning at the level of elementary education. The review of this article indicates the existence of linkages and opportunities for constructivism approaches to improve computational thinking skills by facilitating the use of robotics

Keywords

Computational Thinking Ability, Constructivism, Robotics

Full Text:

PDF

References

G. Chen, J. Shen, L. Barth-cohen, S. Jiang, X. Huang, and M. Eltoukhy, “Computers & Education Assessing elementary students ’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming,” Comput. Educ., vol. 109, pp. 162–175, 2017.

K. Jona et al., “Embedding Computational Thinking in Science , Technology , Engineering , and Math ( CT-STEM ),” no. 2002, pp. 1–5, 2011.

S. Atmatzidou and S. Demetriadis, “Advancing students ’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics : A study on age and gender relevant differences,” Rob. Auton. Syst., vol. 75, pp. 661–670, 2016.

A. Eguchi, “RoboCupJunior for promoting STEM education , 21st century skills , and technological advancement through robotics competition,” Rob. Auton. Syst., vol. 75, pp. 692–699, 2016.

D. X. Sarah, D. X. Gerald, and D. X. X, “Robotic Curriculum Enhances Minimally Invasive General Surgery Residents ’ Education,” J. Surg. Educ., pp. 0–5, 2018.

C. Galindo, “Computers & Education A LEGO Mindstorms NXT approach for teaching at Data Acquisition , Control Systems Engineering and Real-Time Systems undergraduate courses,” Comput. Educ., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 974–988, 2012.

M. U. Bers, L. Flannery, E. R. Kazakoff, and A. Sullivan, “Computers & Education Computational thinking and tinkering : Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum,” Comput. Educ., vol. 72, pp. 145–157, 2014.

S. Adak, “Effectiveness of constructivist approach on academic achievement in science at secondary level,” vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 1074–1079, 2017.

S. Cristea, “The fundaments of constructivist pedagogy,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 180, no. November 2014, pp. 759–764, 2015.

E. Akpınar, B. Aydo, and D. Erol, “Developing a scale aiming at determining the applications of constructivist approach in science course,” vol. 1, pp. 2795–2798, 2009.

C. Okoli and K. Schabram, “A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research,” Sprouts Work. Pap. Informations Syst., vol. 10, no. 26, p. 49, 2010.

J. Webster and R. Watson, “Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing A Literature Review,” MIS Q., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. xii–xxvii, 2002.

J. F. Rath, D. M. Langenbahn, D. Simon, R. L. Sherr, J. Fletcher, and L. Diller, “The construct of problem solving in higher level neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation ଝ,” J. Elsevier Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 613–635, 2004.

I. García, E. Guzmán-ramírez, and C. Gonzalez-rojas, “A constructivist approach for implementing and evaluating algorithms in a machine vision course at the undergraduate level,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 93, pp. 1461–1466, 2013.

J. El Asmar and C. Mady, “A Constructivist Approach to Design Teaching at the Postgraduate Level : The Case of an Interdisciplinary Design Programme at,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 93, pp. 531–538, 2013.

B. Pribadi, “Pendekatan Konstruktivist dalam Kegiatan Pembelajaran.”

D. Jin, J. Chen, C. Richard, and J. Chen, “Model-driven online parameter adjustment for zero-attracting LMS R,” Signal Processing, vol. 152, pp. 373–383, 2018.

A. M. Pinto-llorente, S. C. Martín, M. C. González, and F. J. García-peñalvo, “Developing Computational Thinking via the Visual Programming Tool : Lego Education WeDo,” 2016.

D. Göktürk, “The role of constructivist approach on creativity in primary school music curriculum in the Republic of Turkey,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 3075–3079, 2010.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.