Feasibility Test Analysis on the UPT Humas UNS Information System
Abstract
The development of the UPT Humas UNS information system is carried out using the analysis, design, development, implementation, and evalution (ADDIE) methods. The evaluation technique used is black box testing involving two programming experts to assess the functional readiness of the information system. The feasibility test was carried out using two methods, namely the usability scale (SUS) system to determine the level of usability and the technology acceptance model (TAM) for acceptance analysis of the UNS Public Relations UPT information system. Based on the evaluation that has been carried out, the UNS Public Relations UPT information system that has been successfully developed can run functionally to serve the 12 existing services with a little record of improvement. Judging from the average SUS score obtained, which is 69.75, it is classified as good overall for the level of usability. For the results of the TAM analysis consisting of 6 TAM research hypotheses, the ease of using SI has a significant effect on the expediency and attitude in using SI. The expediency of SI has a significant effect on the attitude to use and the intention to use SI. The attitude to use SI has a significant effect on the intention to use SI and the intention to use SI has a significant effect on the actual use of the system.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Ragowsky, N. Ahituv, and S. Neumann, “Identifying the value and importance of an information system application,” Inf. Manag., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 89–102, 1996, doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(96)01072-5.
L. Suharti and P. R. Sulistyo, “1571697Be4Fe97B1Ddb003D5B309Cfea9F35,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2018.
J. Brooke, “SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale,” Usability Eval. Ind., vol. 189, Nov. 1995.
J. Brooke, “SUS: A Retrospective,” J. Usability Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 29–40, 2013.
Z. Sharfina and H. B. Santoso, “An Indonesian adaptation of the System Usability Scale (SUS),” in 2016 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), 2016, pp. 145–148, doi: 10.1109/ICACSIS.2016.7872776.
D. P. Hasibuan, H. B. Santoso, A. Yunita, and A. Rahmah, “An Indonesian Adaptation of the E-Learning Usability Scale,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1566, no. 1, p. 12051, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1566/1/012051.
E. Ayoub, “Designing and Developing a Personalized Country Recommender System,” no. October, 2019, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32834.94409/1.
W. Arif, “Kajian tentang perilaku pengguna sistem informasi dengan pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model(TAM),” Proceeding B. Konf. Nas. Sist. Inf., no. April 2008, pp. 1–8, 2008, [Online]. Available: http://peneliti.budiluhur.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2008/.../arif+wibowo.pdf.
F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Q., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, Dec. 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
