Effective Use of Blended Learning Flipped Classroom Type Reviewed from Student Learning Outcomes in Digital Simulation Subjects at SMK Negeri 3 Surakarta

Alfin Kausar, Dwi Maryono, Yusfia Hafid Aristyagama

Abstract

This study aims to find out (1) differences in student learning outcomes in the application of blended learning model flipped classroom type with enriched virtual learning model (2) more effective learning model between blended learning model flipped classroom type and enriched virtual learning model. The research method used is a quantitative quasi-experimental design by using pretest-posttest control. The population in this study is all students of grade X majoring in Accounting and Finance of SMK Negeri 3 Surakarta Institution. The sample used in this study was 72 students. Sampling techniques in this research are by total sampling method. Data obtained from pre-test and post-test results based on indicators of student learning outcomes. The results obtained from this study are as follows. First, there are differences in learning outcomes in Digital Simulation subjects in experimental classes by applying flipped classroom type blended learning models and control classes by applying enriched virtual learning models. Evidence from the average study results of experimental classes of 82.94 and control classes of 75.39. Second, flipped classroom blended learning models are more effective than enriched virtual learning models. The effectiveness of applying flipped classroom type blended learning models in experimental classes is in a moderate category, while the effectiveness of implementing enriched virtual learning models in control classes is in a low category.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abid Azhar, K., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Google Classroom: Teachers’ Perceptions. Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 52–66.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Ario, M., & Asra, A. (2018). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Flipped Classroom terhadap Hasil Belajar Kalkulus Integral Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika. ANARGYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.24176/anargya.v1i2.2477

Djamarah, S. B., & Zain, A. (2013). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Guritno, A. (2016). Evaluasi Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi dan Produksi pada Bidang Keahlian Teknik Bangunan di SMK Negeri 6 Bandung. 1–6.

Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: what works and how? 3, 12–18.

Nouri, J. (2016). The flipped classroom: for active, effective and increased learning – especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0032-z

Permendikbud RI. (2005). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI No. 19 tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta.

Pribadi, B. A. (2011). Model ASSURE Untuk Mendesain Pembelajaran Sukses. Jakarta: PT. Dian Rakyat.

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K – 12 Blended Learning. INNOSIGHT Institute, (May), 1–17.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.