Analisis Pola Pikir Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Fluida Statis Berdasarkan Tingkat Metakognisi
Abstract
This study aims to analyze students mindset in solving a static fluid problem based on metacognition level. This research includes descriptive research. The subject of this research is 99 students of grade XI SMA Batik 2 Surakarta. Data collection methods used are test methods and questionnaires. Data analysis techniques using qualitative descriptive analysis. The results showed that students at the metacognition level of tacit use had a thinking pattern in identifying problems by experimenting based on what was already known, students at the metacognition level of aware use had a thought pattern of identifying problems and representing problems by explaining concepts, students at the metacognition level of strategic use have a mindset of identifying and formulating problems, representing problems and planning solutions for completion by proposing completion measures and students at the reflective use level having a mindset of identifying and formulating problems, representing problems, completion steps and evaluate results and completion by providing reasons for selection of settlement measures.
Keywords
References
Alrfooh, A. (2012). Prevailing Patterns of Thinking Among Students of Tafila Technical University, Jordan. Developing Country Studies, Vol.2, No.9, pp.124-138.
Biemer, P. P. & Lyberg, L. E. (2003). Introduction To Survey Quality. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Azizah, U., Suyono, & Suyatno. (2015). Desain dan Validasi Instrumen untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Metakognitif Mahasiswa dalam Materi Larutan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia, pp. 59-65.
Desoete, A. (2009). Mathematics and Metacognition in Adolescents and Adults with Learning Disabilities. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. Vol. 2. Ghent University
Eka. (2003). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Fisika untuk Mengubah Miskonsepsi ditinjau dari Penalaran Formal Siswa. Tesis : Program Studi Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, PPs IKIP Negeri Singaraja.
Noviani, Hartono, Rusilowati. (2017). Analisis Pola Pikir Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sains ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif serta Literasi Sains. Journal of Innovative Science Education, Vol.6, No.2 : 147-154
Nur, M . (2000). Strategi-Strategi Belajar. Surabaya : Unesa University Press.
Nuriliyah, A. (2012). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inquiri terhadap Proporsi Penurunan Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Fluida Statis di Kelas XI MAN 1 Bojonegoro. Skripsi , Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Papaleontiou, & Eleonora. (2008). Metacognition and Theory of Mind United Kingdom. Cambridge Schoolar Publishing
Rahman. (2011). Assessment of Science teachers Mateacognitive Awareness and its impact on the Performance of Students. Desertation of Doctor of Departement of secondary teacher Education Faculty of Education Allama Iqbal:Open University Islamabab
Rahayu, P. (2012). Students Metacognition Level Through Implementation of Problem Based Learning with Metacognitive Strategies at SMAN 1 Manyar. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, Vol.1, No.1, pp.164-173.
Reynolds. (1992). Selective attention and prose learning: Theoretical and empirical research. Educational Psychology Review,Vol.4, pp.345–391.
Schneider W., Artelt C., (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, Vol.42, No.2, pp. 147-152.
Schraw G., Crippen K. J., &. Hartley K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation inscience education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, Vol.36, pp.111-139,
Schraw, & Moshman. (1995). Metacognitive Theories. Lincoln : University of Nebraska.
Sophianingtyas, F., & Sugiarto, B. (2013). Identifikasi Level Metakognitif Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Materi Perhitungan Kimia. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, Vol.2, No.1, pp.21-27.
Suharman . (2005). Psikologi Kognitif. Jombang: Srikandi.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.