Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kerja Laboratorium Fisika untuk Mengukur Sikap dan Tanggung Jawab Siswa

Sulistiyono Sulistiyono, Mundilarto Mundilarto, Heru Kuswanto

Abstract

This research aims to produces a work assessment instruments for effective physics laboratory and is able to measure the attitude of discipline and responsibility of students. The methods used in this research is the research development (R&D) The subject of research used in this students of class X SMA N Margabaru, SMA N Megang Sakti, SMA YPBI 3 Tugumulyo. Processing of data in this study conducted in a qualitative descriptive. The results showed that (1) a workplace assessment instrument decent physics laboratory used to measure attitudes and responsibilities of students based on the results of the validation of the experts included in the category either (2) attitude of discipline students get average 86.2 included in katogori very well, while for the responsibility of the students getting an average 90.7 belong in the category. So a work assessment instrument physics laboratory to effectively measure student attitudes and responsibilities when implementing the activities of the physics laboratory.

Keywords

Instrument Performance Laboratory; Attitude Discipline; Responsibility

Full Text:

PDF

References

Borg, W. R. & Gall, M.D. (2003). Educational research: an introduction 4th Edition. New York: Longman Inc.

Borrmann, T (2008). Laboratory Education in New Zealand. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, science & Tehcnology Education. 2008, 4(4), 327 – 335.

Chiapetta, E. L. & Koballa. T. R. (2010). Science Instruction In The Middle AndSecondary School. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Girault, I., d’Hama, C., Ney, M, et al. (2012). Characterizing the Experimental Procedure in Science Laboratories: A preliminary step towards students experimental design. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 6, 825–854.

Hamida, R, Baharom,S & Hamzah, R. (2012). Assessment of Psychomotor Domain in Materials Technology Laboratory Work. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 718 – 723

Holmes, NG & Wieman, CE.(2016). Examining and contrasting the cognitive activities engaged in undergraduate research experiences and lab courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 12, 020103

Jhonson, R.L, Penny, J.A., & Balita, G. (2009). Assesing performance: designing, scoring, and validating tasks. New York: The Guilford Press.

Kemendikbud. 2013. Kerangka Dasar Kurikulum 2013. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar. Jakarta.

Millar, R. & Abrahams, I. (2009). Practical work: making it more effective. SSR 91(334).

Sasson, I & Cohen, D. (2013). Aseesment for effective intervetion: Enrichment science academic program. J sci Edu Technol, 718-128.

Supahar, 2015. Pengembangan instrumen penilaian kinerja penyusunan laporan praktikum fisika SMP berbasis inkuiri. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 3 (1). 23-29

Subali, B. & Suyata, P., 2012. Pengembangan item tes konvergen dan divergen. Yogyakarta: Diandara Pustaka Indonesia.

Trowbridge, L.W & Bybee, R.W. (1986). Becoming a secondary school science Teacher. Merrill Publishing Company: Ohio.

Wilcox, B.R & Lewandowski, H.J. (2016b). Developing Skills Versus Reinforcing Concepts In Physics Labs: Insight From a Survey Of Students’ Beliefs About Experimental Physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research 13, 010108,1-9.

Widoyoko. (2010). Evaluasi program pembelajaran (Edisi Ketiga). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jmpf.v9i1.31620

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.