Educative Penalty System as a Protection Implementation for Children who Commit Crime

Sulistya Eviningrum

Abstract


Penalizing children who commit crime is actually intended for their-own sake. This kind of penalty has been created in such a way to suit the children. Therefore, the investigation carried out by the authorities before imposing the penalty should not eliminate the aspect of guidance and protection. The punishment formulations that give deterrent effect to those juvenile criminals should be the best effort through non-formal processes that have an optimal role to develop, such as families, schools, or social monitoring institutions. Namely: a). Informal warning; which involves the police to warn the children that they have done the wrong thing and make them not to do it again. There will not be any criminal minutes for this kind of punishment. b). Redeem mistakes with good deeds/ restitution: the children are asked to redeem their mistakes with good deeds, for example by paying compensation to the victim according to the children's capability. c). Community service: those children are ordered to do serve the community or fulfill certain tasks for several hours.

Keywords


Educative penalty; Child protection

Full Text:

PDF
rticle

References


Adillah, S. U., Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Sulitiyono, A. (2019). Juridical Study of Factors Causing Low Informal Worker Participation to Participate in Social Security Employment (Case Study in Central Java Province). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Volume 358, 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019). Atlantik Press.

Akhmaddhian, S., Hartiwiningsih, & Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2017). The government policy of water resources conservation to embodying sustainable development goals: Study in Kuningan, Indonesia. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(12), 419–428.

Arief, B. N. (2005). Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Arief, B. N. (2008). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Penyususnan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Assiddiqie, J. (1996). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Studi Bentuk-Bentuk Pidana dalam Tradisi Hukum Fiqih dan Relevansiya bagi Usaha Pembaharuan KUHP Nasional. Bandung: Angkasa.

Erina, P., & Yanis, A. M. (2020). Reconstruction of Mining Policies on Justice in Lampung Province. Bestuur, 8(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i2.42830

Eviningrum, S., Hartiwiningsih, H., & Jamin, M. (2020). Human rights based law protection model for the mental, spiritual and the healing victims of child trafficking in Indonesia. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 14(3), 1098–1102.

Eviningrum, S., Hartiwiningsih, & Jamin, M. (2019). Strengthening human rights-based legal protection on victims of child trafficking in Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(20), 296–300.

Hakim, A. (2016). Dalapan anak pelaku kejahatan seksual ditangkap di Surabaya.

Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2012). Lingkungan Dan Pedoman Legal Drafting Peraturan Daerah Dalam Rangka Praktik-Praktik Tata Kelola. Yustisia, 1(1), 130–144.

Hanum, W. N. (2020). Setting of Earth Oil Management in Old Wells Based on the Principle Social Justice. Bestuur, 8(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i2.42789

Hutomo, A. S., & Karjoko, L. (2018). Issuance Legality of the Ownership Certificate for the Riparian Area and Its Legal Consequences in Sukoharjo Regency. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(2), 239. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i2.328

Ikhsan, E. (1998). Orientasi Non Humanitis dan Penanganan Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum, Beberapa Contoh Lapangan. Semiloka Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum.

Intaniasari, K. (2020). Gross Split Contract Framework Regulation on the Caring for People. Bestuur, 8(2), 96. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i2.43141

Ishak, N., Hasibuan, R. R., & Arbani, T. S. (2020). Bureaucratic and Political Collaboration Towards a Good Governance System. Bestuur, 8(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i1.42922

Iswantoro, I., Saputra, R., Doyoharjo, A., & Luthviati, R. D. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Supervision of the Prosecutor’s Commission in Indonesia. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 19(2), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v19i2.1180

Jaelani, A. K., Ayu, I. G., Rachmi, K., & Lego, H. (2020). The Political Law of the Constitutional Court In Canceling the Concept of the Four Pillars as an Pancasila as the State Foundation. 12(2), 1314–1321.

Jatmiko, D. R., Hartiwiningsih, & Handayani, G. A. K. R. (2019). A political communication regulation model in local leaders election and legislative election for realizing a just political education. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(20), 349–352.

Karjoko, L. (2017). Setting of Plantation Land Area Limitation Based on Social Function Principles of Land Cultivation Rights To Realize Social Welfare-Promoting Plantation. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 17(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.1.606

Karjoko, L., Jaelani, A. K., Hukum, F., Maret, U. S., Hukum, F., & Riyadi, U. S. (2019). Jurnal Bestuur. 7(1).

Karjoko, L., Maret, U. S., & Riyadi, U. S. (2019). EXECUTABILITY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION REGARDING GRACE PERIOD IN THE FORMULATION OF LEGISLATION. 28(15), 816–823.

Karjoko, L., Santosa, J., & Rachmi Handayani, I. G. A. K. (2019). Disfungsi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(2), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss2.art5

Karjoko, L., Winarno, D. W., Rosidah, Z. N., & Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2020). Spatial planning dysfunction in East Kalimantan to support green economy. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(8), 259–269.

Luthviati, R. D., Registration, C., & Maret, U. S. (2020). Jurnal Bestuur. 8(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.43138

Muladi. (1985). Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Bandung: Alumni.

Muladi. (1990). Proyeksi Hukum Pidana Material Indonesia di Masa Mendatang. Semarang.

Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (1984). Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Semarang: BP UNDIP.

Nurhayati, I., & Karjoko, L. (2019). Civil Relations Regulation After the Expiration of Building. 4(1), 28–34.

Nuryanto, A. D. (2019). Problem Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang yang Berasal dari Predicate Crime Perbankan. Bestuur, 7(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v7i1.43437

Panggabean, M. L. (2006). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Penintensier di Indonesia. Jakarta: UKI Press.

Poernomo, B. (1988). Kapita Selekta Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Prasetyo, B., Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., Sulistyono, A., & Karjoko, L. (2019). Legal framework for social security state civil apparatus. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(20), 310–313.

Rosidah, Z. N. (2020). Coherence of the Rules of Sharia Against Pancasila. Bestuur, 8(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i1.42723

Sakidjo, A., & Poernomo, B. (1990). Hukum Pidana, Dasar Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Kodifikasi. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Santoso, M. A. (2002). Paradigma Baru Hukum Pidana. Malang: Averroes Press.

Suriani, R., Hartiwiningsih, Jamin, M., & Waluyo. (2020). Legal protection of indigenous legal communities and traditional rights holders after the constitutional court decision number 35 / puu-x / 2012. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(3 Special Issue), 1298–1306.

Suyanto, B. (2003). Masalah Sosial Anak. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Tanya, B. L., Simanjuntak, Y. N., & Y.Hage, M. (2010). Teori Hukum Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Taufiq, M. (2014). Keadilan Substansial Memangkas Rantai Birokrasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Triwanto, T., & Aryani, E. (2020). The Urgency of Granting Authority to Assess Corruption Justice Collaborators. Bestuur, 8(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i1.42720

Utomo, R. N., & Karjoko, L. (2018). Role of the Shareholders within the Composition of Authentic Deed by the Notary. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5(3), 307. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i3.428




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jmail.v1i1.44767

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Sulistya Eviningrum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.