PERDAGANGAN KOPI VIETNAM DAN INDONESIA DI EMPAT NEGARA TUJUAN EKSPOR KOPI UTAMA: PENERAPAN MODEL CONSTANT MARKET SHARE

Eko Atmadji, Unggul Priyadi, Siti Achiria

Abstract

Vietnam and Indonesia dominate the world coffee trade, beside Brazil and Columbia.  Coffee exports of these two countries are dominated by robusta coffee. The demand for robusta coffee increases along with the increasing the role of modern coffee makers and baristas in processing robusta coffee. This study employs Constant Market Share as a tool of analysis. The results of Constant Market Share calculations show that Vietnamese coffee and Indonesian coffee are still unable to compete with Arabica coffee. This can be seen from the effect of negative competitiveness for the coffee of the two countries. However, the results of calculating the effects of commodity composition, Vietnamese and Indonesian coffee are favored by coffee importers in the United States, Germany, Italy and Japan. In number of export value, Vietnamese coffee left behindIndonesian coffee in the United States, Germany and Italy. However, in Japan, Vietnamese and Indonesian coffee could not dominate each other. For Indonesia, Japan is the only major importer of coffee in the world that is expected to break the dominance of Vietnamese coffee. Nevertheless, the hope will get a considerable challenges from Japan and domestic itself.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Algieri, B. (2014). Drivers of export demand: A focus on the GIIPS countries. The World Economy, 37(10), 1454–1482.

Aswicahyono, H. (2004). Competitiveness and efficiency of the forest product industry in Indonesia (No. WPE075). Jakarta.

Aswicahyono, H., & Rafitrandi, D. (2017). A Review of Indonesia’s Economic Competitiveness (No. 1/2017). Jakarta.

Atmadji, E., A, E. S. A. S., & Suhardiman, Y. H. (2018). Comparison analysis of imported coffee of Malaysia fromIndonesia and Vietnam. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(1), 93–98.

Aydın, M. F., Çıplak, U., & Yücel, M. E. (2004). Export supply and import demand models for the Turkish economy. The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Research Department Working Paper, 4(09).

Chacholiades, M. (2009). The pure theory of international trade. Aldine Transaction Publishers.

Fitrianto, G., & Widodo, T. (2017). Generalized constant market shares (G-CMS) analysis: Composition and partition approach (No. MPRA Paper 79484). Germany.

Forest, J. J., & Turner, P. (2013). Alternative estimators of cointegrating parameters in models with nonstationary data: An application to US export demand. Applied Economics, 45(5), 629–636.

Hongo, J. (2015). Japanese coffee consumption perks up, Finland world’s top drinkers, The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved September 11, 2018, from https://blogs.wsj.com/japanreal time/2015/06/10/coffee- consumption-hits-record-high- in-japan-survey/

ICO. (2018). Development of coffee trade flows, International Coffee Council, 121st Session, 9-13 April 2018, Mexico City, Mexico. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from http://www.ico.org/documents/ cy2017-18/icc-121-4e-trade- flows.pdf

Nathania, M. (2013). Analisis peran efek pertumbuhan ekspor dunia, efek komposisi komoditas, efek distribusi pasar, dan efek daya saing dalam peningkatan ekspor tujuh komoditas unggulan sektor pertanian Indonesia ke Uni Eropa: Pendekatan constant market share (CMS). Universitas Gajah Mada.

Oh, J., Kim, J., & Siswadi. (2015). The competitiveness of Indonesian wood-based products. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 27(1), 40–67.

Pendergrast, M. (2010). Uncommon grounds: The history of coffee and how it transformed our world. Basic Books.

Permatasari, I. G. A. I., & Rustariyuni, S. D. (2015). Analisis daya saing ekspor biji kakao Indonesia ke Kawasan ASEAN periode 2003-2012. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Universitas Udayana, 4, 855–872.

Purnamasari, M., Hanani, N., & Huang, W. C. (2014). Analisis daya saing ekspor kopi Indonesia di Pasar Dunia. Agricultural Socio- Economics Journal, 14(1).

Richardson, J. D. (1971). Constant market share of export growth. Journal of International Economics, 1, 227–239.

Schuster, M., & Maertens, M. (2013). Do private standards create exclusive supply chains? New evidence from the Peruvian Asparagus export sector. Food Policy, 43, 291–305.

Senhadji, A. S., & Montenegro, C. E. (1999). Time series analysis of export demand equations: A cross-country analysis.IMF staff papers (pp. 259–273). pp. 259–273. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/p ubs/ft/wp/wp98149.pdf

Uriarte, M. C., Baeza, J. A., & de Pablo Valenciano, J. (2017). Analysis of Spain´s competitiveness in the European tomato market: An application of the Constant Market Share method. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 15(3).

Widodo, T. (2008). The method of constant reconsidered: Case studies of ASEAN countries. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 23(3), 223–242.

Wu, J., Wang, J., & Lin, W. (2016). Comparative analysis of primary forest products export in the United States and China using a constant market share model. Forest Products Journal, 66(7), 495–503.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jiep.v19i1.25224

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.