STUDI ARUS INVESTASI LANGSUNG DAN TIDAK LANGSUNG DI ASEAN 4 DALAM PERSPEKTIF MARGIN INTENSIF DAN EKSTENSIF
Abstract
Globalization in economic has an impact on the massive movement of foreign direct (FDI) and indirect (Foriegn Private Investment / FPI) investments in developing countries in the world. By intensive margin government and authority in each country utilizes these conditions as development capital and technology transfer, while for extensive margin foreign investment are used to maintain a conducive relationship between investors and investment destination countries. Foreign investment is an important part of development especially for developing countries. For ASEAN 4 countries investment is very useful as a driver of the national economy, so the consideration of a stable investment climate and macroeconomic environment is important in policy formulation. The method used to analyze the relationship to the intensive and extensive margins of FDI and FPI in ASEAN 4 is the Panel Least Square (PLS) with annual panel data from Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand from 2003 to 2015. The estimation results show that on extensive margins GDP show a positive and significant effect on FDI. While on the FPI model estimation, the three proxy variables (Index Perception Corruption (IPK), Inflation Rate (TI), and lending rate) used indicate a positive direction towards FPI on intensive and extensive margins, but only IPK variable that have positive and significant influence. This is indicated by probalitity value less than 5% (0.05) that is equal to (0.005).
Keywords : Extensive Margin, Foreign Direct Investment, Foreign Private Investment, Intensive Margin, Panel Least Square.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alfaro, Laura., Kalemli-Ozcan, Sebnem., Volosovych, V. (2004). Capital Controls and Capital Flows in Emerging Economies: Policies, Practies and Cinsequences. National Bureau of Economics Research.
Araujo, Juliana., Lastauskas, Povilas., & Papageorgiou, C. (2016). Evolution of Bilateral Capital Flows to Developing Countries at Intensive and Extensive Margins.
Asean Investment Report. (2016). Foreign Direct Investment and MSME Linkage. Jakarta.
Bhagwati, J. (1998). The Capital Myth. Foreign Affairs, 77(3), 7–12.
Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., dan Lee, J.-W. (1998). How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics, 45, 115–135.
Coeurdacier, N., dan P. M. (2009). The geography of asset trade and the euro: Insiders and outsiders. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 23(2), 90–113.
Edwards, S. (1991). Capital flows, foreign direct investment, and debt-equity swaps in developing countries. In In Capital flows in the world economy, ed. Horst Siebert. Tubingen. Germany: J. C. B. Mohr.
Kleinert, J., dan F. T. (2010). Gravity for FDI. Review of International Economics, 18(1).
Krugman, P. R. (1988). Market-Based Debt-Reduction Schemes. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
OECD. (2011). International Capital Flows: Structural Reforms And Experience With The OECD Code Of Liberalisation Of Capital Movements. Report from the OECD to the G20 Sub-Group on Capital Flow Management.
Okada, K. (2013). The Interaction Effects of Financial Opennes and Institution on International Capital Flows. Journal of Macroeconomics, 35(c), 131–143.
Okawa, Y., & Wincoop, E. van. (2012). Gravity in International Finance. Journal of International Economics, 87(2), 205–215.
Rodrik, D. (1998). Who Needs Capital-Account Convertibility? Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University.
Seabra, Fernando., Flach, Lisandra., dan Santos, T. (n.d.). Foreign Portfolio Investment, The European Monetary Union and Exchange Rate Uncertainty.
Waqas, Y., & Nazir, M. I. (2015). Macroeconomics factors and foreign fortfolio investment volatility: A case of South Asian countries. Future Business
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.