Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal of Electrical, Electronic,  Information and Communication Technology (JEEICT) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal in English published twice a year by the Department of Electrical Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia. The JEEICT aims to provide a leading-edge medium for researchers, industry professionals, engineers, educators, students to disseminate research work and studies in the fields of electrical, electronics, information and communication technology. 

The journal publishes work from power systems, electronics, instrumentation, and biomedical engineering, renewable energy and its application, control systems, information technology, and communication and vehicular technology disciplinary, in theoretical and experimental perspectives.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The practice of peer review is to ensure that only good paper is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. Our reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of the Journal of Electrical, Electronic, Information and Communication Technology and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.

Initial manuscript evaluation The Editors first evaluate all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is possible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal.  Those that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least 2 experts for review.

Type of Peer Review The Journal of Electrical, Electronic, Information, and Communication Technology employs double-blind reviewing, where the reviewer remains anonymous throughout the process.

How the reviewer is selected Whenever possible, reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise and our database is constantly being updated.

Reviewer reports Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:  - Is original – Is methodologically sound - Follows appropriate ethical guidelines  - Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions  - Correctly references previous relevant work Language correction is not part of the peer review process, but reviewers may, if so wish, suggest corrections to the manuscript.

How long does the review process take? The time required for the review process is dependent on the response of the reviewers. Should the reviewer’s reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. In rare cases for which it is extremely difficult to find a second reviewer to review the manuscript, or when the one reviewer’s report has thoroughly convinced the Editors, decisions at this stage to accept, reject or ask the author for a revision are made on the basis of only one reviewer’s report. The Editors’ decision will be sent to the author with recommendations made by the reviewers, which usually includes verbatim comments by the reviewers. Revised manuscripts might be returned to the initial reviewers who may then request another revision of a manuscript.

Final report A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers, and may include verbatim comments by the reviewers.

Editors Decision is final Reviewers advise the editors, who are responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Frequency

Journal of Electrical, Electronic,  Information and Communication Technology (JEEICT) published twice in a year :

  • April
  • October

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Screening for Plagiarism

  1. Full plagiarism, partial plagiarism, and self-plagiarism are not allowed.
  2. Authors must not use the words, figures, or ideas of others without attribution. All sources must be cited at the point they are used, and reuse of wording must be limited and be attributed or quoted in the text.
  3. AuthorS should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
  4. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
  5. The editor will run a plagiarism check using TURNITIN for the submitted articles before sending it to the reviewers. We do not process any plagiarised content. If an article has over 30% of total plagiarism and over 2% for each source based on the result of the check,  the article will be rejected. You can resubmit/revise the article after the similarity index less than 30% for total similarity and less than 2% for each source.

 

Retraction

The papers published in Journal of Electrical, Electronic,  Information and Communication Technology (JEEICT) will be considered to retract in the publication if:

  1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of major error (eg, miscalculation or experimental error), or as a result of fabrication (eg, of data) or falsification (eg, image manipulation)
  2. It constitutes plagiarism
  3. The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper attribution to previous sources or disclosure to the editor, permission to republish, or justification (ie, cases of redundant publication)
  4. It contains material or data without authorisation for use
  5. Copyright has been infringed or there is some other serious legal issue (eg, libel, privacy)
  6. It reports unethical research
  7. It has been published solely on the basis of a compromised or manipulated peer review process
  8. The author(s) failed to disclose a major competing interest (a.k.a. conflict of interest) that, in the view of the editor, would have unduly affected interpretations of the work or recommendations by editors and peer reviewers.

 

Withdrawal of Manuscripts

 

  1. The author is not allowed to withdraw published manuscripts. 

  2. If the author still requests withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, the author will be punished with paying IDR300 per manuscript, as withdrawal penalty to the publisher. However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal. 

  3. The withdrawal of manuscript after the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author will be punished by paying IDR 500 per manuscript. Withdrawal of manuscript is only allowed after the withdrawal penalty has been fully paid to the Publisher. If the author doesn't agree to pay the penalty, the author and his/her affiliation will be blacklisted for publication in this journal. Even, his/her previously published articles will be removed from our online system.