EXPLORING FINTECH LENDING USAGE IN INDONESIA THROUGH A SOCIO-CULTURAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
Abstract
The rapid expansion of fintech lending in Indonesia has coincided with rising concerns over digital debt dependency, particularly among low-income and young populations. While regulatory and financial risks have dominated public discourse, less attention has been paid to the psychosocial and socio-cultural conditions underlying fintech lending behavior. This study examines the deviant aspects of fintech use through an integrated psychosocial-cultural lens, highlighting how such behaviors arise not solely from individual irresponsibility but from the intersection of emotional vulnerability, social marginalization, and the cultural normalisation of debt. A mixed-methods approach was employed. The first phase involved a scoping literature review to identify conceptual and theoretical gaps. The second phase applied supervised machine learning (SVM, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Neural Network) to national survey data (BPS and OJK) to detect behavioral patterns. The third phase conducted a thematic analysis of in-depth interviews with five fintech users from high-risk urban areas. The findings indicate consistent patterns of emotional fragility, fintech use dependency, institutional distrust, and symbolic adaptation to debt culture. These behaviors reflect structural and psychological deviance, where fintech use serves as both a coping strategy and a socio-cultural adaptation amid economic precarity and institutional exclusion. This study contributes to interdisciplinary scholarship by extending strain and labeling theories in tandem with psychological theories of vulnerability and coping, reframing fintech use as a socially and emotionally constructed adaptation rather than moral failure. Policy-wise, it calls for culturally grounded financial literacy, stronger digital consumer protection, and inclusive reforms that address systemic inequality and distrust in formal institutions
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abrianti, S., Anggraini, A. M. T., & Probondaru, I. P. (2024). Dampak Pinjaman Online bagi Masyarakat: Mensejahterakan atau Menyengsarakan?(Studi Tentang Pandangan Masyarakat di Wilayah Bintaro, Tanggerang Selatan). UNES Law Review, 6(4), 10420–10431. Alfatih, F., Muqowim, & Anggara, B. (2023). Persepsi Masyarakat tentang Pinjaman Online : Studi Kasus Masyarakat Plaju Kota Palembang Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Keislaman Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(April 2023), 657–668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36088/islamika.v5i2.3115. Amos, V., Papalangi, N., Atma, U., & Makassar, J. (2024). Pinjaman Online : Perilaku Masyarakat dalam Menghadapi Fear Of Missing Out ( FOMO ). 6(1),83–94.https://journal.stiejayakarta.ac.id/index.php/JMBJayakarta/article/view/254 Anandari, D. R., & Sulaiman. (2024). Studi Literatur: Risiko Psikologis Penggunaan Fintech Lending pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal MediaTIK, 7(2), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.59562/mediatik.v7i2.2894 Bagaskara, R. R. (2024). Legal Protection of Consumer Personal Data In Online Loan Transactions. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 2, 1579–1586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v2i7.295 Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 Chen, F., & Yin, C. (2024). Risk Analysis and Supervision of P2P Online Lending. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 14(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54097/xh4ntg56 Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018 Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage. Eid, N. (2019). Essays in Peer-to-Peer Lending Nourhan Eid (Issue February). https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/24550/1/N Eid Thesis.pdf Faisal, A. A., Wiradimadja, A., Ajra, D. A., Adhitama, M. D., Ramadhan, R., S, M. A., Studi, P., Indonesia, U. P., & Bandung, K. (2022). Attack On Pinjol : Siapa Yang Salah Antara Pinjol dan Debitur Attack On Pinjol : Who ’ s Wrong Between Pinjol and Debtor. 2(1), 88–95. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/Cinematology/article/view/42629/18231 Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. International Publishers Habiba, S., Sissah, & Siregar, E. S. (2024). Analisis Penggunaan Fitur Shopee Perspektif Mahasiswa Perbankan Syariah FEBI UIN STS Jambi. Jurnal Akademik Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 1(3), 170–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61722/jaem.v1i3.2582 Halim Dwi Putra, M. Sabri, A. M. (2024). Seminar Nasional Industri dan Teknologi (SNIT), Politeknik Negeri Bengkalis. November, 502–511. https://snit-polbeng.org/eprosiding/index.php/snit Hidayat, K. (2024). Pinjaman Daring Capai Rp 77,02 Triliun Per Desember 2024, Didominasi Gen Z dan Gen Y. KONTAN. https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/pinjaman-daring-capai-rp-7702-triliun-per-desember-2024-didominasi-gen-z-dan-gen-y Hidayat, R., & Pertiwi, F. A. (2025). Pengaruh Konsumtif Dan Resiko Masyarakat Melakukan Pinjol Terhadap perspektif Ekonomi Syariah. 7(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47435/asy-syarikah.v7i1.3539 syarikah Kanda, A. S., & , Mawarni, I. (2024). Analisis Generasi Muda Terjebak Pusaran Hutang Pinjaman Online Akibat Lifestyle Di Kota Cimahi. Jurnal Ilmiah Research Student, 1(3), 634–640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61722/jirs.v1i3.726 Keuangan, O. J. (2024). Financial Technology-P2P Lending-Pinjaman Online Berizin di OJK. In Ojk. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://www.ojk.go.id/waspada-investasi/id/berita/Pages/Financial-Technology-P2P-Lending-Pinjaman-Online-Berizin-di-OJK.aspx LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539 Manitra, R. R. (2024). Illegal Online Loan (Pinjol) in Indonesia: Ethical and Human Rights Perspective. Recht Studiosum Law Review, 3(1), 58-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.32734/rslr.v3i1.16206 Muttaqin, I., & Nuryanti, L. (2023). Online loan phenomenon among students: micro and macro psychological analysis. Psikologia: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Psikologi, 18(3). https://talenta.usu.ac.id/jppp/article/view/13873 Putri, Namira Maulida Eka, & Sonja Andarini (2022). Pengaruh Self Control dan Financial Attitude terhadap Financial Management Behaviour Pengguna Layanan Buy Now Pay Later. JEAM : Jurnal Ekonomi Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 21(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19184/jeam.v21i1.30594 Nuraini, G. F., & Zaky, M. (2023). Analisis Lifestyle Exposure Theory terhadap Korban dari Pinjaman Online Ilegal melalui Aplikasi “Pinjaman Now.” Anomie: Jurnal Kriminologi, 5(1), 38–51. https://jom.fisip.budiluhur.ac.id/index.php/anomie/article/view/356 Nurapipah, W. A., & Abdullah, M. N. A. (2024). Tabungan Cinta yang Pecah: Dampak dan Risiko Perceraian akibat Pinjaman Online Tanpa Sepengetahuan Pasangan. Jurnal Sosiologi, Antropologi, Dan Budaya Nusantara, 3(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.55123/sabana.v3i1.3345 Oktavianus, J., Wijaya, L. I., & Sutedjo, B. S. (2025). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Financial Wellbeing Generasi Z Berpenghasilan di Surabaya, INDONESIA. JIMEA : Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, Dan Akuntansi), 9(1), 333–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v9i1.4899 Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 Pattinama, G. L. L. (2024). Pengaruh Kemudahan Akses Terhadap Niat Melakukan Pinjaman Pada Peer to Peerlending. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 6(1), 139–160. http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/JJ/article/view/22988/pdf Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1(1), 81-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116251 Ratnaningrum, T., Dewi, R., & Ilham, I. (2024). Sisi Gelap Dampak Digital Teknologi Di Indonesia ( Pinjaman Online Ilegal Di Indonesia ). INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(1), 11715–11726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i1.8984 Restike, K. P., Presasti, D., Fitriani, D. I., & Ciptani, M. K. (2024). Pengaruh Literasi Keuangan, Perilaku Pembelian Impulsif, Dan Gaya Hidup Terhadap Penggunaan Shopee Paylater Gen Z. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 22(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v22i1.11609 Rosadi, D. S., & Andriani, I. (2023). Hubungan Impulsive Buying dengan Perilaku Berhutang pada Pengguna Pinjaman Online. JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24815/jimps Safitri, Dewi, Aprilia Roosyidah, and Suhandy Wijaya. 2024. “Perilaku Fear of Missing Out ( FoMO ) Pada Gaya Hidup Generasi Z Di Media Sosial.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Ilmu Sosial (SNIIS) 3:1051–61. Sari, A. A., Hidayati, A. N., Nasution, S. W. P., Martanto, Limba, F. B., & Sa’diah, K. (2023). Negative Impact of Financial Technology : A Case Study of Illegal Peer to Peer ( P2P ) Lending " Pinjol ". 1–7. https://conference.loupiasconference.org/index.php/icoissee3/article/view/450 Septiani, L. (2024). Utang Pinjol Masyarakat Naik 25% Jadi Rp 64,56 T per Mei 2024 - Fintech Katadata. KATADATA. https://katadata.co.id/digital/fintech/668bc30fbceab/utang-pinjol-masyarakat-naik-25-jadi-rp-64-56-t-per-mei-2024 Setiawan, F. H., Radjamin, I. P., & Ariani Mintarti. (2024). Online Loans: Consumptive Behavior of Surabaya Students In Order to Support Social Status. Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(1), 413–425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37385/msej.v5i1.4067 Suciati, & Mulawarman, K. (2024). Social Penetration Analysis in Self-Disclosure of Online Loan Application Users to Their Partners. International Journal of Latest Technology In Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS), XIII(X). https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS Sucidha, I., & Yuliani. (2025). Analisa Keputusan Mahasiswa Di Kota Banjarbaru Dalam Menggunakan Pinjaman Online. 5, 3590–3599. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative Suhayati, M. (2023). Fenomena kredit macet pinjaman. Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI. Usman, P. M., Suganda, N. P., Somad, M. A., & Turginbayeva, A. N. (2023). The Impact of Paylater Online Loans on Society From an Islamic Perspective. 7(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51192/almubin.v6i01.436 Widjaja, G. (2022). Pemahaman Konsumen Tentang Pinjaman Online (Pinjol) Di Jakarta. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(2), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.37567/pkm.v2i2.1025 Wijayanti, S., & Hartiningrum. (2022). Dampak Aplikasi Pinjaman Online Terhadap Kebutuhan Dan Gaya Hidup Konsumtif Buruh Pabrik. MIZANIA: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi, 2(2), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.47776/mizania.v2i2.592 Wirawan, L. G. (2024). Strain sebagai pendorong mahasiswa menggunakan pinjol ilegal : Analisis viktimisasi mahasiswa korban pinjol ilegal. 1(2), 0–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61511/jegeo.v1i2.2024.1164 Yosiana, M. (2023). Hegemoni media sosial terhadap maraknya pinjaman online (pinjol). 2(6), 161–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v2i6. 1144 Yulianto, D. (2024). Analisis Kejahatan Ekonomi dalam Praktik Pinjaman Online : Dampak terhadap Masyarakat dan Strategi Penanggulangan. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 5(12), 5641–5657. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i12.1888 Zhao, H., Peng, H., & Li, W. (2022). Analysis of Factors Affecting Individuals ’ Online Consumer Credit Behavior : Evidence From China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(July). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922571
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.