Assessing Lecturers’ Acceptance towards Online Learning System: The Institutional Theory Perspective

Anggraini Candra Kusuma, Basori Basori, Cucuk Wawan Budiyanto

Abstract

This research aims to assess the lecturers’ acceptance level in using the Online Learning System (SPADA). The institutional theory is an extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which is it analyzed variables of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, coercive pressure, normative pressure, mimetic pressure and behavior intention. This research used quantitative research design with survey method. Meanwhile, the sampling technique used cluster random sampling. The respondents of this research were lecturers who had applied SPADA at a state university in Central Java. In this research, the assessment of the questionnaire used the Likert scale. Besides, the tests used instrument test, classic assumption test, multiple regression analysis, and hypothesis testing by using SPSS. The result shows that from the six hypotheses that had been tested, the hypotheses of H1, H2, H3, H4 have no significant influence and the hypotheses of H5 and H6 have significant influence. It means the lecturers who have high social status are influencing others lecturers who have low social status in adopting SPADA although all variables have contribution in influencing the lecturers on behavior intention to adopt SPADA. It indicates the social factor is being attention in analyzing behavior intention in adopting technology.

Keywords

Accepting Level; Institutional Theory; SPADA.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Shami, S. A., Sedik, S., Rashid, N., & Hussin, H. (2018). An empirical analysis of MOOC adoption from the perspective of institutional theory. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 10(6 Special Issue), 332–343.

Anggraeni, R. (2015). Pengaruh Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan Dan Persepsi Kegunaan Terhadap Niat Untuk Menggunakan Dan Penggunaan Aktual Layanan Jejaring Sosial Berbasis Lokasi (Studi Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya Malang). Ekonomi Bisnis, 20(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.17977/um042v20i1p44-52

Anis Chaeruman, U., Wibawa, B., & Syahrial, Z. (2018). Determining the Appropriate Blend of Blended Learning: A Formative Research in the Context of Spada-Indonesia. American Journal of Educational

Research, 6(3), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-3-5

Gao, S., & Yang, Y. (2016). An empirical study on users’ adoption of MOOCs from the perspective of the institutional theory. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 16(4), 377–388.

https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2016.081654

Hossain, L., & de Silva, A. (2009). Exploring user acceptance of technology using social networks. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2009.02.005

Hovav, A. (2017). How Espoused Culture Influences Misuse Intention: A Micro-Institutional Theory Perspective. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017), 6031–6040. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2017.721

Jan, P. T., Lu, H. P., & Chou, T. C. (2012). The adoption of e-learning: An institutional theory perspective.

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 326–343.

Kasmadi, & Sunariah, N. S. (2014). Panduan Modern Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Lase, D. (2019). Pendidikan di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Sundermann, 1(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.36588/sundermann.v1i1.18

Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 40(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4

Lestari, R. I. (2018). Determinan Penerapan Akuntansi Manajemen Lingkungan ( Environmental Management Accounting ) Pada Entitas Bisnis Umkm Di Jawa Timur.

Marta, R. (2018). EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN KETERAMPILAN KOMPUTER DAN

PENGOLAHAN INFORMASI (KKPI) KPI BERBASIS E-LEARNING. 4(1).

Masyhuri, & M.Zainuddin. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian. Malang: PT Refika Aditama.

Nordin, N., Norman, H., & Embi, M. A. (2016). Technology Acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses in

Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 1–16.

https://doi.org/10.21315/mjde2015.17.2.1

Rahayu, S. K., Widilestariningtyas, O., & Rachmanto, A. (2010). PERSEPSI KEGUNAAN ( PERCEIVED

USEFULNESS ) DAN PERSEPSI KEMUDAHAN ( PERCEIVED EASE OF USE ) ( Survey pada

Pemerintah Daerah Kotawaringin Barat Kalimantan Tengah ). Majalah Ilmiah UNIKOM, 13(1), 3–12.

Riyanda, A. R., Herlina, K., & Wicaksono, B. A. (2020). Evaluasi Implementasi Sistem Pembelajaran Daring

Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Lampung. Jurnal IKRA-ITH Humaniora, 4(1), 66– 71. Retrieved from https://journals.upi-yai.ac.id/index.php/ikraith-humaniora/article/view/669

Sadhasivam, J. (2014). Educational paradigm shift: Are we ready to adopt MOOC? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(4), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i4.3756

Sadikin, A., & Hakim, N. (2019). Pengembangan Media E-Learning Interaktif Dalam Menyongsong Revolusi Industri 4 .0. 5(2), 131–138.

Shi, W., Shambare, N., & Wang, J. (2008). The adoption of internet banking: An institutional theory perspective. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 12(4), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4760081

Tileng, K. G. (2015). Penerapan Technology Acceptance Model pada Aplikasi Edmodo di Universitas Ciputra Surabaya menggunakan Analisis Jalur. 01(01), 28–37.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Wibawanto, H. (2019). E-Learning Quality Evaluation Instrument for SPADA Indonesia. 379(Veic), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.015

Yuliarti, M. S. (2019). Societal impact of e-learning: Channel complementarity among students in the use of SPADA in universitas sebelas maret. Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Systems, ICTS 2019, 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTS.2019.8850967

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v4i2.47271