Are the Keyboards Weightier than the Biros? The Effect of Computer-Based Testing on Students’ Achievement and Anxiety in Mathematics

ADENEYE OLAREWAJU AWOFALA

Abstract

Are the keyboards weightier than the biros? This question is the focus of the present study in which the investigation of the modes of testing in mathematics (computer-based testing-CBT and paper-based testing-PBT) was carried out using mathematics achievement and mathematics anxiety as dependent measures. Through a pre-test post-test experimental research, the study tested two null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance using an independent samples t-test. The study lasted for four weeks in two Nigerian senior secondary schools. Results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the mean mathematics achievement scores of students tested by the computer-based test and the paper-based test. Also, there was no significant difference between the mean mathematics anxiety scores of students tested by the computer-based test and the paper-based test. The implication of these results is that assessing students using the two modes showed no variations in their achievement and anxiety in mathematics. Thus, the mode of testing showed no differential effect on students’ learning outcomes in mathematics. Based on the findings of this study, government at levels in Nigeria need to put in place the enabling environment and infrastructural facilities needed for schools to benefit fully from the advantages inherent in the CBT mode of assessment.

Keywords

Keyboard, Biro, Computer-based testing, Paper-based testing, Achievement, Anxiety, Mathematics

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akinsola, M. K. & Awofala, A. O. A. (2009). Effect of personalisation of instruction on students’ achievement and self-efficacy in mathematics word problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(3), 389-404. doi: 10.1080/00207390802643169.

Awofala, A. O. A & Sopekan, O. S. (2013). Recent curriculum reforms in primary and secondary schools in Nigeria in the new millennium, Journal of Education and Practice, 4(5), 98-107.

Awofala, A. O. A. & Akinoso, S. O. (2017). Assessment of psychometric properties of mathematics anxiety questionnaire by preservice teachers in south-west, Nigeria. ABACUS: The Journal of the Mathematical Association of Nigeria, 42(1), 355-369.

Awofala, A. O. A. & Awolola, S. A. (2011). The effect of self-efficacy, anxiety, attitude, and previous mathematics achievement on senior secondary students’ performance mathematics. African Journal of Historical Sciences in Education, 7(2), 198 – 209.

Awofala, A. O. A. & Odogwu, H. N. (2017). Assessing preservice teachers’ mathematics cognitive failures as related to mathematics anxiety and performance in undergraduate calculus. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(2), 81 – 97.

Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B. (1989). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.) (pp. 367–407). NY: American Council on Education – Macmillan.

Choi, I. C., Kim, K. S., & Boo, J. (2003). Comparability of a paper-based language test and a computer-based language test. Language Testing, 20(3), 295–320.

Chua, Y. P. & Don, Z. M. (2013). Effects of computer-based educational achievement test on test performance and test takers’ motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1889–1895.

Chua, Y. P. (2012). Effects of computer-based testing on test performance and testing motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1580–1586.

Coniam, D. (1999) Subjects’ reactions to computer-based tests. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 23(3), 195–206.

Coniam, D. (2006). Evaluating computer-based and paper-based versions of an English-language listening test. ReCALL, 18(2), 193-211. DOI: 10.1017/S0958344006002.

Cresswell, J., Schwantner, U. & Waters, C. (2015). A review of international large-scale assessments in education: Assessing component skills and collecting contextual data. PISA, The World Bank, Washington, D.C./OECD Publishing, Paris.

DeAngelis, S. (2000). Equivalency of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing. Journal of Allied Health, 29(3), 161–164.

Friedrich, S., & Bjornsson, J. (2008). The transition to computer-based testing – New approaches to skills assessment and implications for large-scale testing . Retrieved 16.5.12.

Fulcher, G. (2009). Test use and political philosophy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 29, 3–20.

Hosseini, M., Abidin, M. J. Z. & Baghdarnia, M. (2014). Comparability of test results of computer based tests (CBT) and paper and pencil tests (PPT) among English language learners in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 659 – 667.

Jansen, B. R. J., Louwerse, J., Straatemeier, M., Van der Ven, S. H. G., Klinkenberg, S., & Van der Maas, H. L. J. (2013). The Influence of experiencing success in math on math anxiety, perceived math competence, and math performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 190-197.

Jones, N., Kuijper, H. & Verschoor, A. (2001) Relationships between pencil-and-paper tests and computer based testing. Paper presented at the 2001 A LTE Conference ‘European language testing in a global context’. Barcelona, 5–7 July, 2001.

Khoshsima, H, Hosseini, M & Hasheni Toroujeni, S. M. (2017). Cross-mode comparabilityof computer-based testing (CBT) versus paper and pencil-based testing (PBT): An investigation of testing administration mode among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 12(2),

Kolagari, S., Modanloo, M., Rahmati, R., Sabzi, Z. & Ataee, A. J. (2018). The effect of computer-based tests on nursing students’ test anxiety: A quasi-experimental study. Acta Inform Med. 26(2), 115-118. doi: 10.5455/aim.2018.26.115-118.

Mazzeo, J., Druesne, B., Raffeld, P. C., Checketts, K. T., & Muhlstein, A. (1991). Comparability of computer and paper-and-pencil scores for two CLEP general examinations. College Board Report, No. 91–5 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 344 902).

Nikou, S. A. & Economides, A. A. (2016). The impact of paper-based, computer-based and mobile-based self-assessment on students’ science motivation and achievement. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1241–1248

Noyes, J. M. & Garland, K. J (2008). Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? Ergonomics, 51(9), 1352–1375.

OECD (2010). PISA computer-based assessment of student skills in science. OECD Publishing.

Ogunmakin, A. O. & Osakuade, J. O. (2014). Computer anxiety and computer knowledge as determinants of candidates’ performance in computer-based test in Nigeria. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 4(4), 495-507.

Öz, H., & Özturan, T. (2018). Computer-based and paper-based testing: Does the test administration mode influence the reliability and validity of achievement tests? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 67-85.

Scheuermann, F., & Pereira, A. G. (2008). Towards a research agenda on computer-based assessment: Challenges and needs for European Educational Measurement. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Tatar, E., Zengin, Y., & Kagizmanli, T. B. (2015). What is the relationship between technology and mathematics teaching anxiety? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 67-76.

Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 210–216.

Yu, C. H., & Ohlund, B. (2010). Threats to validity of research design . Retrieved 7.2.2012.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v4i1.40023