Effect of Guided Discovery learning model in mastering of Force and Motion subject

Parno P

Abstract

This research aims to describe students’ mastering of the basic concept about Force and Motion through the Guided Discovery learning model. This research uses pre-experimental one-group pretest-post test design. The research subjects are 25 students in sixth semester in the physics education department who are taking the Capita Selecta of School Physics course. This research uses the Basic Concept Mastering about Forceand Motion Test, and the Students Response Questionnaire for Learning Process instruments. The test data is analyzed using an average normalized gain secure, andthe question naire data are analyzed descriptively. The results show that student (1) has an average of mastering of the basic concept 75.38, an average normalized gain score of individual 0.556 that is smaller than an average normalized gain score of class 0.568 (medium category), and (2) gives a positive response for the learning process, namely 58.33% agree and 38.22% strongly agree, on the Force and Motion topic.

Full Text:

PDF

References

AAPT. 2009. The Role, Education, and Qualifcations and Professionals Development of Secondary School Physics Teacher, College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers.

Arends, R.I. 2009. Learning to Teach. Ninth Edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Parno. 2006. Pendekatan Kontekstual Model Pembelajaran Kelompok Pola Tutorial Sebaya dalam Matakuliah Kapita Selekta Fisika Sekolah untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Fisika Sekolah. Jurnal MIPA Universitas Negeri Malang, Vol. 35, No. 1, Hal. 29-42.

Singh, C., dan Schunn, C. D. 2009. Connecting three pivotal concepts in K-12 science state standards and maps of conceptual growth to research in physics education. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, Vol. 5, No. 2, Hal.16-42.

Rapp, D. N. 2005. “Mental Models: Theoretical Issues for Visualizations in Science Education.” John K. Gilbert (ed). Visualization in Science Education, Netherlands: Springer. Hal.43-60.

Allbaugh, A. R. 2003. The Problem-Context Dependence of Students’ Application of Newtons’ Second Law. Disertasi, Kansas State University.

Bao, L., Edward F., dan Redish, E. F. 2006. “Model analysis: Representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning.” PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS - PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH 2.

Formica, S.P., Easley, J.L., dan Spraker, M.C. 2010. Transforming common-sense beliefs into Newtonian thinking through Just-In-Time Teaching. PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS - PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH 6.

Corpuz, E. D. G. 2006. Students’ Modelling of Frictionat The Microscopic Level. Disertasi, Kansas State University.

Meyer, R. E. 2003. Learning and Instruction. New Jersey: Merril Prentice Hall.

Eggen, P., dan Cauchak, D. 2010. Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms Eighth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Wenning, C. J. 2005. Levels of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, Vol. 2, No. 3, Hal.3-11.

Slavin, R. E. 2006. Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Eight Edition. Boston: Pearson.

Lindstrøm, C., dan Sharma, M. D. 2009. Link maps and map meetings: Scaffolding student learning. PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS - PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH 5.

Moore, K. D. 2005. Effective Instructional Strategies from Theory to Practice. London: Sage Publications.

Effendi, L. A. 2012. Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Metode Penemuan Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Vol. 13, No. 2, Hal. 1-9.

Karim, A. 2011. Penerapan Metode Penemuan Terbimbing dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Vol. 1, Hal. 21-32.

Sinambela, R. S. 2012. Pengaruh Metode Penemuan Terbimbing terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa pada Materi Pokok Gerak Lurus di Kelas VII SMP N 18 Medan. Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Medan.

Parno. 2013. Pengajaran Berdasarkan Materi Instruksional melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Diagram Benda Terisolasi untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman dan Keterampilan Berpikir Mahasiswa. Disertasi, Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Schreiber, J. B., Asner-Self, K. 2011. Educational Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Bao, L. 2006. Theoretical comparisons of average normalized gain calculations. Am. J. Phys., Vol. 74, No. 10, Hal. 917-922.

Ubaya. 2006. Panduan Pelaksanaan kegiatan dan Sistem Evaluasi HPKP SMA 2006.

Halliday, D., Resnick, R., dan Walker, J. 2014. Fundamentals of Physics 10th edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Demirci, N. 2008. Misconception Patterns from Students to Teachers: An Example for Force and Motion Concepts. Journal of Science Education, Vol. 9, No. 1, Hal. 55-59.

Jackson, J., Dukerich, L., dan Hestenes, D. 2008. Modeling Instruction: An Effective Model for Science Education. Science Educator, Vol. 17. No. 1, Hal. 10-17.

Parno. 2012. Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Matakuliah Pilihan Fisika Zat Padat Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika Melalui Model STAD dan Strategi Self-Explanation. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, Vol. 8, No. 2, Hal. 115-126.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/ijap.v5i02.276

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.